date:20220930

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-09-30 Thread Miro Hrončok


On 30. 09. 22 9:21, Sandro wrote:

On 29-09-2022 23:34, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:28 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:


rust-just orphan, rust-sig 3 weeks ago


I'll take rust-just.
I already have a package spec that builds/installs in rawhide chroot
and just filed an unretirement ticket.


Just head over to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-just, log in and take 
it. No need to file any ticket.


The package is retired, hence a ticket is unfortunately neccessary.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-09-30 Thread Jaroslav Mracek

python3-dnf is not going to be removed from Fedora 38 or 39. There is even not 
a conflict between dnf5 and python3-dnf. Anyway we strongly recommend to start 
with transition to DNF5.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-09-30 Thread Sandro


On 29-09-2022 23:34, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:28 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:


rust-just orphan, rust-sig 3 weeks ago


I'll take rust-just.
I already have a package spec that builds/installs in rawhide chroot
and just filed an unretirement ticket.


Just head over to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-just, log in 
and take it. No need to file any ticket.


-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Self Introduction: Pavel Šimovec

2022-09-30 Thread Pavel Simovec

Hello everyone,
My name is Pavel Šimovec. I am from Czech Republic and I work in Red Hat
for 3 years. Currently I am pursuing my master's degree at FI MUNI.

I have worked as QE on ManageIQ/Cloudforms and then on *insights-operator
. *Currently I am working
as a Software engineer at aufover .

The goal for now is to take care of some math packages (blis flexiblas
numpy openblas qhull scipy) and to eventually become their maintainer.

Best regards,
Pavel Šimovec.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: OpenSSL and ECC patents (was Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1)

2022-09-30 Thread Simon Farnsworth via devel

> On 29 Sep 2022, at 21:37, drago01  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022, Clemens Lang  > wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Michael J Gruber mailto:m...@fedoraproject.org>> 
> wrote:
> 
> Understanding is helped greatly by communication, though. Legal answers
> such as "We can not" do not further this understanding, and "We can not
> and we can not tell you why" is not much better, but these are the typical
> answer we get, not even with a "sorry, but we can't". Obviously, these
> legal questions are difficult to explain, but it can't be true that each
> such case is under a "gag order”.
> 
> A lawyer at a previous employer told me that explanations of such decisions
> can be used against you in court. Presumably, this also applies here.
> 
> That's sounds overlay paranoid. How can an explanation on why you are *not* 
> doing something be used against you in court? I can get why "we don't think 
> that patent XYZ applies so this is fine to ship" is problematic, but the 
> other way around just doesn't make sense. 

It’s related to additional damages for wilful infringement; if I say “I will 
not ship foo because I cannot get a suitable licence for patent US abc123455”, 
and the owner of that patent then claims I infringe because I ship bar, which 
they claim infringes patent US abc123455, they can also claim that my 
infringement of patent US abc123455 by shipping bar was wilful, because I 
clearly knew of the patent, I had analysed it to determine what it might apply 
to, and I’d decided to ship *bar* anyway, even though I knew or should 
reasonably have known (based on my analysis of why I couldn’t ship foo) that 
bar would put me into infringement.

Unfortunately, this is the flip side of well-meant legislation around wilful 
infringement - it’s simplest for a big US entity like Red Hat to simply say 
“no, and we’re not telling you why” to packages, because then there’s nothing 
to build a claim of wilful infringement around.
— 
Simon Farnsworth___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

CPE Weekly Update for Week 39 of 2022

2022-09-30 Thread Akashdeep Dhar

Hi everyone,

This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
The report could be found at
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update-week-39-2022/.

If you want to receive weekly reports by email in the future, please
subscribe to either https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ or
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/news/commblog/61. We will stop
sending them in the future.

Regards,
CPE Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

aarch64 builders upgrade

2022-09-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi

Greetings. 

I thought I would let everyone know that I have moved all the buildvm-a64
instances from some older hardware (lenovo emags) to newer hardware
(altra Mt. Snow). This should result in a noticable speed increase
along with allowing us to increase density of vm's per host.

If you notice any issues with buildvm-a64 machines, please file an 
infrastructure ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Thanks, 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Karma swaps

2022-09-30 Thread Jerry James

I have two updates for F37 that will not be stable by final freeze
based on time alone, but that I think should be stable to avoid
disruptions to users.  I could wait and ask for freeze exceptions, but
I would first like to ask the community to give karma to these
updates.  I am willing to test and give karma to your updates, too.
Let me know what updates to test, and how to test them.

The two updates are:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a6d8261b07 - sympy
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-21f6ca9264 - gap,
pari, & friends

The sympy update deals with the disappearance of the JDK on i386.
Sympy uses the antlr4 package, a Java package, to generate some
grammar files.  Since there is no JDK on i386, there is no antlr4
package either.  This makes one of the BuildRequires for the package
unresolvable.  The ideal solution would be to stop building sympy on
i386.  However, sympy is consumed by a number of packages that still
build for i386.  I think that is the right long-term goal, and will
work toward that in the coming months.  This update is a stop-gap
measure.  It switches sympy from a noarch package to an archful
package so that we can omit the problematic BuildRequires on i386.
This will leave sympy partially broken on i386 (it is still mostly
functional), but that is unavoidable at this point.  I think this
should go stable so that the noarch -> archful change happens at a
release boundary, rather than after F37 is released.  (And hopefully
we can change back for F38!)

For testing purposes, this build of sympy should function identically
to the previous build.  Install the python3-sympy and python3-ipython
packages, then verify that it starts and runs at all, perhaps like
this:

```
$ isympy
[snip sympy banner]

In [1]: import math

In [2]: math.sqrt(9)
Out[2]: 3.0

In [3]: from sympy import symbols

In [4]: x, y = symbols('x y')

In [5]: expr = x + 2*y

In [6]: expr
Out[6]: x + 2⋅y
```

The second update is large, containing 100 package builds.  It
contains an update of gap to version 4.12.0, and an update of pari to
version 2.15.0.  Both new versions come with significant performance
improvements.  The gap update in particular drops i386 builds for all
packages named gap-pkg-*, as well as gap, GAPDoc, and xgap.  I think
this should go stable before release so that the i386 disappearing act
doesn't happen post-release, and also because the gap and pari updates
both contain a few backwards incompatibilities, which should be
introduced at release boundaries.

Almost every package in this update has a test suite that is run at
build time, so they have been tested quite well already, and I have
been testing them also.  To test the gap part, install the gap and
gap-pkg-xmod packages.  (The gap-pkg-xmod package pulls in several
other gap-pkg-* packages, so we can show they all work together.)
Then do a few things with gap-pkg-xmod, like this:

```
$ gap
[snip gap banner]
gap> LoadPackage("xmod");
[snip package loading messages]
gap> c5 := Group( (5,6,7,8,9) );
Group([ (5,6,7,8,9) ])
gap> SetName( c5, "c5" );
gap> id5 := IdentityMapping( c5 );
IdentityMapping( c5 )
gap> ac5 := AutomorphismGroup( c5 );

gap> act := MappingToOne( c5, ac5 );
[ (5,6,7,8,9) ] -> [ IdentityMapping( c5 ) ]
gap> XMod( id5, act ) = XModByBoundaryAndAction( id5, act );
true
gap> H12 := SmallCatOneGroup( 12, 4, 3 );
Cat-1-group with underlying group Group( [ f1, f2, f3 ] ) .

gap> C12 := SmallCat1Group( 12, 4, 3 );
[Group( [ f1, f2, f3 ] ) => Group( [ f1, f2,  of ... ] )]
gap> C12 := CatOneGroupToXMod( H12 );
[Group( [ f1, f2, f3 ] ) => Group( [ f1, f2,  of ... ] )]
gap> C18 := Cat1Select( 18, 4, 3 );
[(C3 x C3) : C2 => Group( [ f1,  of ...,  of ... ] )]
gap> H18 := Cat1GroupToHAP( C18 );
Cat-1-group with underlying group (C3 x C3) : C2 .

gap> IdCatOneGroup( H18 );
[ 18, 4, 3 ]
gap> IdCat1Group( C18 );
[ 18, 4, 3 ]
```

To test the pari part, install the pari-gp package and try a few calculations,
like this:

```
$ gp
[snip pari banner]
? 1 + 1
%1 = 2
? (x+1)^(-2)
%2 = 1/(x^2 + 2*x + 1)
? Mod(x, x^2+x*y+y^2)^3
%3 = Mod(y^3, x^2 + y*x + y^2)
? T = x^2 + 1;
? factor(T*(1 + O(5^3)))
%5 =
[  (1 + O(5^3))*x + (2 + 5 + 2*5^2 + O(5^3)) 1]

[(1 + O(5^3))*x + (3 + 3*5 + 2*5^2 + O(5^3)) 1]

? R(x) = {
  my(s);
  s = zeta(2) * sum(a=1, sqrt(x), moebius(a)*(x\a^2));
  (s - x) / x^0.4;
}
? R(10^7)
%7 = 0.052092560787004188970344062406837112269
? R(10^12)
%8 = 0.010948893958117048274619354741656931605
? R(10^15)
%9 = 0.00012562581350676279794919752938422775380
```

Warning: you'll notice a slight pause when computing R(10^12), and a
significant pause when computing R(10^15).  Pari hasn't hung.  Wait a
minute and it will be back with the answer.

Sorry for the epistle.  I will be very grateful for any testing and
karma help you can give me.  Let me know what I can test and give
karma to for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list --

Re: Self Introduction: Pavel Šimovec

2022-09-30 Thread Erol Keskin

Hi Pavel, welcome here!

On Fri, 30 Sept 2022, 18:38 Sandro,  wrote:

> On 30-09-2022 17:33, Sandro wrote:
> > On 30-09-2022 15:27, Pavel Simovec wrote:
> >> The goal for now is to take care of some math packages (blis flexiblas
> >> numpy openblas qhull scipy) and to eventually become their maintainer.
> >
> > Welcome Pavel!
> >
> > numpy has just been adopted by Jonathan, who already mentioned that
> > co-maintainers are welcome. Since you are already in the packagers
> > group, you can ask him to make you a co-maintainer.
> >
> > Drop him a line: numpy-maintain...@fedoraproject.org
>
> Disregard that. I'm in dire need of the weekend. It was python-pandas
> that was adopted by Jonathan.
>
> Welcome, nonetheless. I'm sure your skills will be helpful.
>
> -- Sandro
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Release criteria proposal: except BitLocker-enabled installs from Windows dual-boot criterion bootloader requirement

2022-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson

On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> For background here, see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049849
> 
> right now, when installing Fedora alongside a Windows install with
> BitLocker enabled, trying to boot Windows from the Fedora boot menu
> does not work.
> 
> We waived the bug as a blocker for Fedora 36 on the basis upstream did
> not consider it fixable within the F36 timeframe. We agreed that if
> upstream still couldn't get this fixed for F37, we'd consider revising
> the criteria.
> 
> Well, we're approaching F37 Final and the bug is still open, and
> there's no appreciable movement upstream, so I'm proposing the criteria
> change. I propose we change this:
> 
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can
> boot into both Windows and Fedora."
> 
> to say:
> 
> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
> existing clean Windows installation. As long as the Windows
> installation does not have BitLocker enabled, the installer must also
> install a bootloader which can boot into both Windows and Fedora."

So since nobody objected to this proposal, I'm going to put it into
production today and kick the current accepted blocker bug back to
proposed (from where I'd expect it to get rejected).

Thanks folks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Self Introduction: Pavel Šimovec

2022-09-30 Thread Sandro


On 30-09-2022 17:33, Sandro wrote:

On 30-09-2022 15:27, Pavel Simovec wrote:

The goal for now is to take care of some math packages (blis flexiblas
numpy openblas qhull scipy) and to eventually become their maintainer.


Welcome Pavel!

numpy has just been adopted by Jonathan, who already mentioned that
co-maintainers are welcome. Since you are already in the packagers
group, you can ask him to make you a co-maintainer.

Drop him a line: numpy-maintain...@fedoraproject.org


Disregard that. I'm in dire need of the weekend. It was python-pandas 
that was adopted by Jonathan.


Welcome, nonetheless. I'm sure your skills will be helpful.

-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-09-30 Thread Sandro


On 30-09-2022 10:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 30. 09. 22 9:21, Sandro wrote:

On 29-09-2022 23:34, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:28 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:


rust-just orphan, rust-sig 3 weeks ago


I'll take rust-just.
I already have a package spec that builds/installs in rawhide chroot
and just filed an unretirement ticket.


Just head over to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-just, log in and take
it. No need to file any ticket.


The package is retired, hence a ticket is unfortunately neccessary.


My bad. I just looked at the assignee section. 

Sorry about the noise.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Self Introduction: Pavel Šimovec

2022-09-30 Thread Sandro


On 30-09-2022 15:27, Pavel Simovec wrote:

The goal for now is to take care of some math packages (blis flexiblas
numpy openblas qhull scipy) and to eventually become their maintainer.


Welcome Pavel!

numpy has just been adopted by Jonathan, who already mentioned that 
co-maintainers are welcome. Since you are already in the packagers 
group, you can ask him to make you a co-maintainer.


Drop him a line: numpy-maintain...@fedoraproject.org

-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: CVE Tracking Bugs

2022-09-30 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim

Hi all,

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 06:04:14PM +, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> Hi Fedorians,
> 
> I think the security tracking bug filing process needs to be amended. The
> current process is quite frustrating for me and other contributors. This is
> especially bad for Go CVEs, which there are lot of.
> 
> Red Hat Product Security creates a single tracking bug for Fedora{, EPEL}
> _and_ all Red Hat products and CCs a bunch of Fedora maintainers. They then
> create separate bugs for each package that they deem affected. The affected
> packages are oftened determined in a manner that appears overzealous and
> arbitrary.
> 
> After the bugs are created, we get spammed with a bunch of notifications
> about private bugs, RH product errata, and various other things that are
> completely irrelevant to Fedora. These messages flood my Bugzilla mailbox
> and obscure actual issues that I need to address. I do not really care
> whether a Go CVE has been mitigated in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management
> for Kubernetes 2.4 for RHEL 8"
> or "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.5 for RHEL 8" or 
> "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.6 for RHEL 8."
>

An unrelated issue, but also not ideal:

some engineers at my company worked on fixing some Eternal Terminal
(package: et) security issues. Those are fixed, we pushed out updated
packages, then went through the CVE process...

Then CVEs get filed against both Fedora and EPEL, warning against
versions < 6.2.0 ... while 6.2.1 has been in stable updates for months.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__closed__=Fedora=et_id=12953025=Fedora=Fedora%20EPEL_format=advanced_desc=CVE_desc_type=allwordssubstr

Feedback to RH prodsec people -- if the process right now assumes every
package built before the CVE is public is affected, this might not work
well for fixes released while under embargo.

Thanks,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fwd: Fwd: CVE Tracking Bugs

2022-09-30 Thread Maxwell G via devel

Hi Pete, et. al,

On Fri Sep 16, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> I am forwarding this to the list to keep the community in the
> loop. I will respond in more detail later.

I apologize for taking so long to actually respond to this. It seems
this slipped under my radar.

> From: Pete Allor 
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:49:04 -0400
> Maxwell,
> One of my folks pointed this post out to me today.   From a ProdSec
> perspective, you can reach out directly to me.
>
> The PSIRT Team and their work on CVEs report up through me, so I will be
> glad to have a discussion with you and why my folks are not supporting you
> fully and how to fix that.
>
> I think the main thrust you are pointing to is that as the CNA for Fedora,
> we should not be mixing all Red Hat errata into the Fedora project.
>  Meaning keeping them more separated and distinct.   That may not address
> all concerns, but I think it would be a good starting point to keep the
> focus correct and distinct, not overload on messages and bring attention to
> what is critical / important so they are not missed.

Yes, I agree; that would definitely cut down the amount of unactionable
notifications we get.

The other main issue is the way effected packages are determined.
Often, CVE bugs are filed against packages that have already been
patched or that were never effected to begin with.

Thank you again for reaching out, and I apologize for my overly ranty
initial email!

--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2022-10-03 Fedora QA Meeting

2022-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything much for the agenda again. There will be a blocker review
meeting, though.

If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can run the meeting.

Thanks folks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 37 compose report: 20220930.n.1 changes

2022-09-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-37-20220929.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220930.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:12
Upgraded packages:   33
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.07 GiB
Size of upgraded packages:   301.58 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   5.14 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-20220930.n.1.s390x.qcow2
Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x
Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-20220930.n.1.s390x.raw.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: datanommer-0.2.0-24.fc36
Summary: A storage consumer for the Fedora Message Bus (fedmsg)
RPMs:datanommer
Size:21.33 KiB

Package: ghc8.10-8.10.7-5.fc37
Summary: Glasgow Haskell Compiler
RPMs:ghc8.10 ghc8.10-Cabal ghc8.10-Cabal-devel ghc8.10-Cabal-doc 
ghc8.10-Cabal-prof ghc8.10-array ghc8.10-array-devel ghc8.10-array-doc 
ghc8.10-array-prof ghc8.10-base ghc8.10-base-devel ghc8.10-base-doc 
ghc8.10-base-prof ghc8.10-binary ghc8.10-binary-devel ghc8.10-binary-doc 
ghc8.10-binary-prof ghc8.10-bytestring ghc8.10-bytestring-devel 
ghc8.10-bytestring-doc ghc8.10-bytestring-prof ghc8.10-compiler 
ghc8.10-compiler-default ghc8.10-containers ghc8.10-containers-devel 
ghc8.10-containers-doc ghc8.10-containers-prof ghc8.10-deepseq 
ghc8.10-deepseq-devel ghc8.10-deepseq-doc ghc8.10-deepseq-prof ghc8.10-devel 
ghc8.10-directory ghc8.10-directory-devel ghc8.10-directory-doc 
ghc8.10-directory-prof ghc8.10-doc ghc8.10-doc-index ghc8.10-exceptions 
ghc8.10-exceptions-devel ghc8.10-exceptions-doc ghc8.10-exceptions-prof 
ghc8.10-filepath ghc8.10-filepath-devel ghc8.10-filepath-doc 
ghc8.10-filepath-prof ghc8.10-filesystem ghc8.10-ghc ghc8.10-ghc-boot 
ghc8.10-ghc-boot-devel ghc8.10-ghc-boot-doc ghc8.10-ghc-boot-prof 
ghc8.10-ghc-boot-th ghc8.10-ghc-boot-th-devel ghc8.10-ghc-boot-th-doc 
ghc8.10-ghc-boot-th-prof ghc8.10-ghc-compact ghc8.10-ghc-compact-devel 
ghc8.10-ghc-compact-doc ghc8.10-ghc-compact-prof ghc8.10-ghc-devel 
ghc8.10-ghc-doc ghc8.10-ghc-heap ghc8.10-ghc-heap-devel ghc8.10-ghc-heap-doc 
ghc8.10-ghc-heap-prof ghc8.10-ghc-prof ghc8.10-ghci ghc8.10-ghci-devel 
ghc8.10-ghci-doc ghc8.10-ghci-prof ghc8.10-haskeline ghc8.10-haskeline-devel 
ghc8.10-haskeline-doc ghc8.10-haskeline-prof ghc8.10-hpc ghc8.10-hpc-devel 
ghc8.10-hpc-doc ghc8.10-hpc-prof ghc8.10-libiserv ghc8.10-libiserv-devel 
ghc8.10-libiserv-doc ghc8.10-libiserv-prof ghc8.10-manual ghc8.10-mtl 
ghc8.10-mtl-devel ghc8.10-mtl-doc ghc8.10-mtl-prof ghc8.10-parsec 
ghc8.10-parsec-devel ghc8.10-parsec-doc ghc8.10-parsec-prof ghc8.10-pretty 
ghc8.10-pretty-devel ghc8.10-pretty-doc ghc8.10-pretty-prof ghc8.10-process 
ghc8.10-process-devel ghc8.10-process-doc ghc8.10-process-prof ghc8.10-prof 
ghc8.10-stm ghc8.10-stm-devel ghc8.10-stm-doc ghc8.10-stm-prof 
ghc8.10-template-haskell ghc8.10-template-haskell-devel 
ghc8.10-template-haskell-doc ghc8.10-template-haskell-prof ghc8.10-terminfo 
ghc8.10-terminfo-devel ghc8.10-terminfo-doc ghc8.10-terminfo-prof ghc8.10-text 
ghc8.10-text-devel ghc8.10-text-doc ghc8.10-text-prof ghc8.10-time 
ghc8.10-time-devel ghc8.10-time-doc ghc8.10-time-prof ghc8.10-transformers 
ghc8.10-transformers-devel ghc8.10-transformers-doc ghc8.10-transformers-prof 
ghc8.10-unix ghc8.10-unix-devel ghc8.10-unix-doc ghc8.10-unix-prof 
ghc8.10-xhtml ghc8.10-xhtml-devel ghc8.10-xhtml-doc ghc8.10-xhtml-prof
Size:988.86 MiB

Package: pypy3.7-7.3.9-4.3.7.fc37
Summary: Python 3.7 implementation with a Just-In-Time compiler
RPMs:pypy3.7 pypy3.7-devel pypy3.7-libs
Size:96.93 MiB

Package: rust-ffsend-0.2.76-2.fc37
Summary: Easily and securely share files from the command line
RPMs:ffsend
Size:9.87 MiB

Package: rust-ffsend-api-0.7.3-4.fc37
Summary: Fully featured Firefox Send API client
RPMs:rust-ffsend-api+crypto-openssl-devel rust-ffsend-api+default-devel 
rust-ffsend-api+openssl-devel rust-ffsend-api+send2-devel 
rust-ffsend-api+send3-devel rust-ffsend-api+websocket-devel 
rust-ffsend-api-devel
Size:114.81 KiB

Package: rust-hyper-native-tls-0.3.0-10.fc37
Summary: native-tls support for Hyper
RPMs:rust-hyper-native-tls+default-devel rust-hyper-native-tls-devel
Size:24.57 KiB

Package: rust-hyper0.10-0.10.16-10.fc37
Summary: Modern HTTP library
RPMs:rust-hyper0.10+default-devel rust-hyper0.10+nightly-devel 
rust-hyper0.10-devel
Size:144.36 KiB

Package: rust-iron-0.6.1-7.fc37
Summary: Extensible, Concurrency Focused Web Development in Rust
RPMs:rust-iron+default-devel rust-iron+hyper-native-tls-devel 
rust-iron+native-tls-example-devel rust-iron-devel
Size:65.06 KiB

Package: rust-multipart-0.18.0-3.fc37
Summary: Backend-agnostic support for POST multipart/form-data requests
RPMs:rust-multipart+buf_redux-devel rust-multipart

Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1

2022-09-30 Thread Björn Persson

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Considering that we have been shipping these hardware codec interfaces for 
> years without any legal trouble, I find this absolutely ridiculous.

The entire codec patent business is absolutely ridiculous. Such is the
reality we must live in.

Björn Persson


pgpzmooEtzlFN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Test-Announce] 2022-10-03 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 37 Blocker Review Meeting

2022-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson

# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-10-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat

Hi folks! We have 6 proposed Final blockers and 3 proposed Final
freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting. Note, I
will be away on Monday, so Geoff (coremodule) will run the meeting.

If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .

Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If
you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links
labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions.
Those links take you to tickets where you can vote.
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how
exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the
meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs
where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS
MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!**

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F36 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good weekend and Geoff will see you on Monday!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131142] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0208 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131142

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-43f55eb05b has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-43f55eb05b`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-43f55eb05b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131142
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2022-09-30 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9f67252d52   
chromium-105.0.5195.125-2.el8
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6319bfdcaa   
python-dnslib-0.9.21-1.el8
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3bebee4625   
openssl3-3.0.1-41.el8.1
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-54e8e9bf3b   
dropbear-2019.78-4.el8
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-39cd10714f   
lighttpd-1.4.67-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

gitqlient-1.5.0-2.el8
intel-ipsec-mb-1.3.0-1.el8

Details about builds:



 gitqlient-1.5.0-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f70a782e69)
 Multi-platform Git client written with Qt

Update Information:

Update to latest version

ChangeLog:

* Fri Sep 30 2022 Artem Polishchuk  1.5.0-2
- build: Add qt5-qtsvg dep | rhbz#2001086
* Thu Sep 29 2022 Artem Polishchuk  1.5.0-1
- chore(update): 1.5.0
* Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.4.3-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.4.3-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2001086 - Button and menu icons missing if you don't install qtsvg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001086
  [ 2 ] Bug #2090570 - CVE-2022-21680 gitqlient: marked: regular expression 
block.def may lead Denial of Service [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090570
  [ 3 ] Bug #2092713 - CVE-2022-21681 gitqlient: marked: regular expression 
inline.reflinkSearch may lead Denial of Service [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092713




 intel-ipsec-mb-1.3.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7395ecb083)
 IPsec cryptography library optimized for Intel Architecture

Update Information:

* ZUC-EIA3-256 8-byte and 16-byte tag support added for SSE, AVX, AVX2 and
AVX512 * AES-ECB AVX512-VAES implementation added *AES-ECB optimizations for AVX
and SSE * AES-ECB AVX2-VAES implementation added * JOB API GHASH support added *
SHA1/224/256/384/512 multi-buffer implementation added * Multi-buffer SHA1,
SHA224 and SHA256 use SHANI if available * Synchronous cipher and hash burst API
added (cipher API only supports AES-CBC and AES-CTR and hash API only supports
HMAC-SHA1, * HMAC-224, HMAC-256, HMAC-384 and HMAC-512) * Asynchronous burst API
added that supports all cipher and hash modes * SNOW3G-UEA2 SSE multi-buffer
implementation added * SNOW3G-UIA2 SSE multi-buffer initialization and key-
stream generation added * SNOW3G-UEA2 and SNOW3G-UIA2 SSE implementation used in
JOB API for AVX and AVX2 architectures * New SGL job API (AES-GCM and
CHACHA20-POLY1305 only) * Enforced EVEX PMADD52 encoding in AVX512 code *
Restructured reset flow of architecture managers * SSE, AVX, AVX2 and AVX512
managers were split to better cover different types * Added library self-test
functionality enbranch64 not emitted on Windows builds (CET related) * use SHANI
extensions in AVX2 type-2 and AVX type-2 for SHA224, HMAC-SHA224, SHA256 and
HMAC-SHA256 * use SHANI extensions in AVX type-2 for SHA1, HMAC-SHA1 * no-GFNI
option added to help with testing

ChangeLog:

* Wed Sep 28 2022 Marcel Cornu  1.3.0-1
- Update for release package v1.3
* Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2.0-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Mar  2 2022 Marcel Cornu  1.2.0-2
- Correct spelling of IPsec in package description


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

2022-09-30 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1de0ed44a1   
kitty-0.26.3-2.el9
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4c5aee9b50   
chromium-105.0.5195.125-2.el9


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing

gitqlient-1.5.0-2.el9
h5py-3.7.0-2.el9
onedrive-2.4.20-3.el9
perl-Color-ANSI-Util-0.164-8.el9
perl-Color-RGB-Util-0.606-4.el9
perl-ColorThemeBase-Static-0.008-8.el9
perl-ColorThemes-Standard-0.003-4.el9
perl-Graphics-ColorNamesLite-WWW-1.14.000-8.el9
perl-Inline-Files-0.71-12.el9
perl-Regexp-Pattern-Perl-0.007-1.el9
perl-Test-RandomResult-0.001-8.el9
perl-YAML-PP-0.034-2.el9
perl-boolean-0.46-19.el9
testssl-3.0.8-1.el9

Details about builds:



 gitqlient-1.5.0-2.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d3b4b099f9)
 Multi-platform Git client written with Qt

Update Information:

Initial package

ChangeLog:

* Fri Sep 30 2022 Artem Polishchuk  1.5.0-2
- build: Add qt5-qtsvg dep | rhbz#2001086
* Thu Sep 29 2022 Artem Polishchuk  1.5.0-1
- chore(update): 1.5.0
* Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.4.3-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.4.3-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Aug 30 2021 Artem Polishchuk  - 1.4.3-1
- build(update): 1.4.3
* Sat Aug  7 2021 Artem Polishchuk  - 1.4.1-1
- build(update): 1.4.1
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.4.0-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
* Sun Jul 11 2021 Artem Polishchuk  - 1.4.0-1
- build(update): 1.4.0
* Tue Apr 27 2021 Artem Polishchuk  - 1.3.2-1
- Initial package




 h5py-3.7.0-2.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e922550e2e)
 A Python interface to the HDF5 library

Update Information:

Build for EPEL9

ChangeLog:

* Mon Jun 13 2022 Python Maint  - 3.7.0-2
- Rebuilt for Python 3.11
* Tue May 24 2022 Terje Rosten  - 3.7.0-1
- Update to 3.7.0
* Sun Jan 23 2022 Terje Rosten  - 3.6.0-1
- Update to 3.6.0
* Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.4.0-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
* Sun Nov 21 2021 Orion Poplawski  - 3.4.0-3
- Rebuild for hdf5 1.12.1
* Sun Oct  3 2021 Terje Rosten  - 3.4.0-2
- Revert an upstream commit that caused crash in PySCF (rhbz#2009628)
* Sat Sep 18 2021 Terje Rosten  - 3.4.0-1
- Update to 3.4.0
* Tue Aug 10 2021 Orion Poplawski  - 3.2.1-4
- Rebuild for hdf5 1.10.7
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.2.1-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jun  4 2021 Python Maint  - 3.2.1-2
- Rebuilt for Python 3.10
* Tue Mar  9 2021 Orion Poplawski  - 3.2.1-1
- Update to 3.2.1
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.1.0-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Sat Nov  7 2020 Terje Rosten  - 3.1.0-1
- Update to 3.1.0
* Fri Oct 30 2020 Orion Poplawski  - 3.0.0-1
- Update to 3.0.0
* Mon Jul 27 2020 Terje Rosten  - 2.10.0-4
- Add openmpi and mpich subpackages
* Thu Jun 25 2020 Orion Poplawski  - 2.10.0-3
- Rebuild for hdf5 1.10.6

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2099681 - Please build h5py for EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099681




 onedrive-2.4.20-3.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-82f5080682)
 OneDrive Free Client written in D

Update Information:

Build onedrive-2.4.20-3.el9

ChangeLog:

* Sat Aug 13 2022 Zamir SUN  - 2.4.20-1
- Update to 2.4.20
* Wed Jul 27 2022 Kalev Lember  - 2.4.19-3
- Rebuilt for ldc 1.30
* Fri Jul 22 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2.4.19-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun 28 2022 Zamir SUN  - 2.4.19-1
- Update to 2.4.19
* Fri Jun  3 2022 Fedora Release Monitoring 
 - 2.4.18-1
- Update to 2.4.18 (#2093172)
* Sat Apr 30 2022 Fedora Release Monitoring 
 - 2.4.17-1
- Update to 2.4.17 (#2080550)
* Thu Mar 10 2022 Fedora Release Monitoring 
 -

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-09-30 Thread updates

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f0317a13d8   
dropbear-2017.75-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

php-getid3-1.9.22-1.el7

Details about builds:



 php-getid3-1.9.22-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-41ac58b9a9)
 The PHP media file parser

Update Information:

**Version 1.9.22**: (2022-09-29) James Heinrich :: 1.9.22-202207161647  * bugfix
#387 fails to detect h265 video codec (QuickTime) * bugfix #385 Quicktime
extended atom size * bugfix #378 AAC bitrate cache warning * bugfix #376
simplexml_load_string improvments * bugfix #374 MOD improved SoundTracker
support * bugfix #371 fragmented MP4 unsupported warning * bugfix #369 fix
remote URLs pattern * bugfix #366 change @error-suppress to isset (quicktime) *
bugfix #365 ZIP array offset on value of type int * bugfix #364 add support for
ANIMEXTS1.0 in GIF files * bugfix #363 ASF improve support of Header Extension
Object data * bugfix #362 version update for ramsey/composer-install * bugfix
#359 MPEG-2 aspect ratio divide-by-zero * bugfix #358 free format mp3 bitrate *
bugfix #355 undefined array key in ID3v2 chapters * bugfix #352 avoid false
detection of Musepack format * bugfix #351 Incorrect length passed to fread on a
flac file * bugfix #348 more targeted usage of clearstatcache calls * bugfix
#347 fixed reported by PHPStan v0.12.99 * bugfix QuickTime support 'ID32' frame
(ID3v2 inside QT) * bugfix fix various PHP 8.1 issues * bugfix PDF prevent
undefined index

ChangeLog:

* Fri Sep 30 2022 Remi Collet  - 1.9.22-1
- update to 1.9.22


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2130628] Please branch and build perl-Inline-Files in epel9

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130628



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7c0154bb33 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7c0154bb33

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130628
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2130729] perl-PAR-1.018 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130729

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-0c72d50e5d has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-0c72d50e5d`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0c72d50e5d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130729
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2130650] Please branch and build perl-boolean in epel9

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130650



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7c0154bb33 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7c0154bb33

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130650
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-XML-LibXML] PR #2: 2.0208 bump

2022-09-30 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-LibXML` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
2.0208 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-LibXML/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-PAR] PR #1: Tests

2022-09-30 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PAR` that you are 
following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131142] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0208 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131142

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|caillon+fedoraproject@gmail |
   |.com, jples...@redhat.com,  |
   |ka...@ucw.cz,   |
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |rhug...@redhat.com, |
   |rstr...@redhat.com, |
   |sandm...@redhat.com |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131142
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-XML-LibXML] PR #2: 2.0208 bump

2022-09-30 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-LibXML` that 
you are following:
``
2.0208 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-LibXML/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2130729] perl-PAR-1.018 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130729



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-0c72d50e5d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0c72d50e5d


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130729
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-PAR] PR #1: Tests

2022-09-30 Thread Jitka Plesnikova


jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PAR` that you are 
following:
``
Tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PAR/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2130729] perl-PAR-1.018 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130729

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-1.018-1.fc38




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130729
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131142] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0208 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131142

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-43f55eb05b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-43f55eb05b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131142
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

aarch64 builders upgrade

2022-09-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi

Greetings. 

I thought I would let everyone know that I have moved all the buildvm-a64
instances from some older hardware (lenovo emags) to newer hardware
(altra Mt. Snow). This should result in a noticable speed increase
along with allowing us to increase density of vm's per host.

If you notice any issues with buildvm-a64 machines, please file an 
infrastructure ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Thanks, 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131364] New: Please build perl-Eval-WithLexicals for EPEL9

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131364

Bug ID: 2131364
   Summary: Please build perl-Eval-WithLexicals for EPEL9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Eval-WithLexicals
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: steve.tray...@cern.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Please can perl-Eval-WithLexicals be built for EPEL 9

I managed to build the current rawhide package
perl-Eval-WithLexicals-1.003006-17 in EPEL9
and install it within an epel9 mock.

thanks


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131364
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131365] New: perl-Object-Remote uninstallable on epel9 - perl(Eval::WithLexicals)

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365

Bug ID: 2131365
   Summary: perl-Object-Remote uninstallable on epel9 -
perl(Eval::WithLexicals)
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Object-Remote
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: steve.tray...@cern.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

perl-Object-Remote-0.004001-10.el9.noarch from epel 9 is uninstallable

How reproducible:
Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install EL9
2.dnf install perl-Object-Remote

Actual results:

Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides perl(Eval::WithLexicals) needed by
perl-Object-Remote-0.004001-10.el9.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use
not only best candidate packages)


Expected results:

It should install


Additional info:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131364

submitted


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1655461] w3c-markup-validator-22.9.29 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|w3c-markup-validator-21.10. |w3c-markup-validator-22.9.2
   |12 is available |9 is available



--- Comment #35 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Releases retrieved: 22.9.29
Upstream release that is considered latest: 22.9.29
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.3-25.fc37
URL: https://validator.github.io/validator/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5111/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/w3c-markup-validator


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1655461] w3c-markup-validator-22.9.29 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461



--- Comment #36 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-d4dj3cdd/w3c-markup-validator.spec']' returned non-zero exit
status 1.

StdOut:
error: Bad source: ./w3c-markup-validator-22.9.29.tar.xz: No such file or
directory


Traceback:
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py",
line 56, in build
result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line
188, in build
raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report
it on the-new-hotness issue tracker:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131365] perl-Object-Remote uninstallable on epel9 - perl(Eval::WithLexicals)

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365

Steve Traylen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Depends On||2131364





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131364
[Bug 2131364] Please build perl-Eval-WithLexicals for EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131364] Please build perl-Eval-WithLexicals for EPEL9

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131364

Steve Traylen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2131365





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365
[Bug 2131365] perl-Object-Remote uninstallable on epel9 -
perl(Eval::WithLexicals)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131364
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131365] perl-Object-Remote uninstallable on epel9 - perl(Eval::WithLexicals)

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365

Steve Traylen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2124459





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124459
[Bug 2124459] Please branch and build perl-Net-OpenSSH in epel9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2124459] Please branch and build perl-Net-OpenSSH in epel9

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124459

Steve Traylen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2131365





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131365
[Bug 2131365] perl-Object-Remote uninstallable on epel9 -
perl(Eval::WithLexicals)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124459
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2124459] Please branch and build perl-Net-OpenSSH in epel9

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124459

Steve Traylen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags|needinfo?(steve.traylen@cer |
   |n.ch)   |



--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/47846


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124459
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131297] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.31 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131297

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.31-1.fc
   ||38



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for Fedora ≥ 38.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131297
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131297] perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.31 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131297

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131297
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2131297] New: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.31 is available

2022-09-30 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131297

Bug ID: 2131297
   Summary: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.31 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-FFI-CheckLib
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 0.31
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.31
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.30-1.fc38
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/FFI-CheckLib/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/13614/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131297
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

47 matches

Mail list logo