Re: F38 proposal: Ostree Native Container (Phase 2, stable) (System-Wide Change proposal)
On 10/14/22 18:09, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OstreeNativeContainerStable I know there's a lot going on here, so I put together https://github.com/cgwalters/dnfimage-config as a demonstration system to show this all works today. (Though there's a lot left to do) To say this another way...I really, really wish I had a time machine to go back and announce *this* instead of doing Fedora Atomic Host way back in the day. If when Docker had come out (before Kubernetes, before podman, before CoreOS) I wish I'd said "hey this container stuff is cool, why don't we make bootable host operating systems configurable via containers too"). Oh well, better late than never! (And yes, we're not the first to this nowadays, but...first, this path gives a seamless upgrade for all the existing ostree-based systems out there, and second, you absolutely can continue to do "dnf install cowsay" or whatever client side on standalone systems like desktops and homelab servers, you aren't obligated to tie your an installed OS to external build infrastructure) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue I just wanted to throw in my two cents on this, that I absolutely love the idea. We all wish we had Way Back machines. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221015.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221014.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221015.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:52
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages:1.24 GiB
Size of upgraded packages: 320.30 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of upgraded packages: 3.83 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B
= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Server_KVM qcow2 ppc64le
Path: Server/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-Rawhide-20221015.n.0.ppc64le.qcow2
= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz aarch64
Path:
Labs/aarch64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Rawhide-20221014.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Server raw-xz aarch64
Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-Rawhide-20221014.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: packetdrill-2.0~20220927gitc556afb-2.fc38
Summary: Quick, precise tests for entire TCP/UDP/IPv4/IPv6 network stacks
RPMs:packetdrill packetdrill-data
Size:524.25 KiB
Package: ruby-build-20221004-1.fc38
Summary: Compile and install Ruby
RPMs:ruby-build ruby-build-rbenv
Size:928.45 KiB
= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: drush-8.1.16-11.fc37
Summary: Command line shell and scripting interface for Drupal
RPMs:drush
Size:476.59 KiB
Package: origin-3.11.2-8.fc37
Summary: OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat
RPMs:origin origin-clients origin-cluster-capacity origin-docker-excluder
origin-dockerregistry origin-excluder origin-hyperkube origin-hypershift
origin-master origin-node origin-pod origin-sdn-ovs origin-service-catalog
origin-template-service-broker origin-tests origin-web-console
Size:1.24 GiB
Package: php-JsonSchema-1.6.1-19.fc37
Summary: PHP implementation of JSON schema
RPMs:php-JsonSchema
Size:34.38 KiB
Package: php-SymfonyCmfRouting-1.4.1-11.fc37
Summary: Extends the Symfony2 routing component for dynamic routes and chaining
RPMs:php-SymfonyCmfRouting
Size:41.51 KiB
Package: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth-1.0.1-11.fc37
Summary: Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
RPMs:php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth
Size:20.80 KiB
Package: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client-1.0.0-11.fc37
Summary: Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
RPMs:php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client
Size:24.66 KiB
Package: php-asm89-stack-cors-1.2.0-10.fc37
Summary: Cross-origin resource sharing library and stack middleware
RPMs:php-asm89-stack-cors
Size:12.82 KiB
Package: php-channel-digitalsandwich-1.3-20.fc37
Summary: Adds digitalsandwich channel to PEAR
RPMs:php-channel-digitalsandwich
Size:8.31 KiB
Package: php-channel-dropbox-php-1.3-19.fc37
Summary: Adds the Dropbox-PHP channel to PEAR
RPMs:php-channel-dropbox-php
Size:8.30 KiB
Package: php-channel-phpdoc-1.3-21.fc37
Summary: Adds phpdoc channel to PEAR
RPMs:php-channel-phpdoc
Size:8.18 KiB
Package: php-channel-phpqatools-1.3-21.fc37
Summary: Adds phpqatools channel to PEAR
RPMs:php-channel-phpqatools
Size:8.27 KiB
Package: php-channel-pirum-1.3-18.fc37
Summary: Adds pear.pirum-project.org channel to PEAR
RPMs:php-channel-pirum
Size:8.26 KiB
Package: php-channel-symfony-1.3-21.fc37
Summary: Adds symfony project channel to PEAR
RPMs:php-channel-symfony
Size:8.28 KiB
Package: php-codeception-specify-1.1.0-9.fc37
Summary: BDD code blocks for PHPUnit and Codeception
RPMs:php-codeception-specify
Size:15.79 KiB
Package: php-codeception-verify-1.0.0-8.fc37
Summary: BDD assertion library for PHPUnit
RPMs:php-codeception-verify
Size:12.49 KiB
Package: php-consolidation-config-2.0.1-5.fc37
Summary: Provide configuration services for a command-line tool
RPMs:php-consolidation-config
Size:33.01 KiB
Package: php-consolidation-log-2.0.2-5.fc37
Summary: Improved PSR-3 / Psr\\Log logger based on Symfony Console components
RPMs:php-consolidation-log
Size:19.42 KiB
Package: php-di-6.3.4-2.fc36
Summary: The dependency injection container for humans
RPMs:php-di
Size:64.13 KiB
Package: php-di-invoker-2.3.2-3.fc37
Summary: Generic and extensible callable invoker
RPMs:php-di-invoker
Size:23.00 KiB
Package: php-di-phpdoc-reader-2.2.1-4.fc37
Summary: Parses @var and @param values in PHP docblocks
RPMs:php-di-phpdoc-reader
Size:14.60 KiB
Package: php-di-symfony2-bridge-3.0.0-8.fc37
Summary: PHP-DI integration with Symfony
RPMs:php-di-symfony2-bridge
Size:12.10 KiB
Package: php-digitalsandwich-Phake-1.0.2-20.fc37
Summary: Phake is a PHP mocking framework that is based on Mockito
RPMs:php-digitalsandwich-Phake
Size:48.80 KiB
Package: php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir-0.1-14.fc37
Summary: Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification for PHP
RPMs:php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir
Size:10.70 KiB
Package: php-dropbox-php-Dropbox-1.0.0-20.fc37
Summary: Library for
Fedora 37 compose report: 20221015.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-37-20221014.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 ppc64le Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-20221014.n.0.ppc64le.qcow2 Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz ppc64le Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-37-20221014.n.0.ppc64le.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Review Swaps
Hi all, I have two packages for which I'd like to offer to swap reviews: 1) Bug 2135036 - Review Request: golang-github-sajari-fuzzy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2135036 This is a new dependency blocking an update to one of my existing (Go) packages. Autogenerated spec, should be a trivial review. 2) Bug 2126785 - Review Request: usbrelay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126785 USB-connected electrical relay control, based on hidapi Thank you -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)
This is perhaps straying from the topic of python-toml, but this message
prompted me to remove[1] the python-tomli dependency from the hatch package.
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hatch/c/7a40576697ae9b58231efcfdcf9c869394d52f72?branch=rawhide
On 10/14/22 15:36, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
On 22/10/06, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonToml
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-toml}} (`python3-toml`) package will be
[https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
deprecated] in [[Releases/38|Fedora 38]]. The
[https://pypi.org/project/toml/ upstream toml package] is considered
unmaintained (see [[#Detailed_Description|description]]) and Python
3.11 contains [https://peps.python.org/pep-0680/ a TOML-reading
library in the standard library]. Existing Fedora packages depend on
{{package|python-toml}}, so we cannot remove it yet. Packagers are
encouraged to work with upstreams to switch to
[https://peps.python.org/pep-0680/
tomllib]/[https://pypi.org/project/tomli/ tomli] for reading toml or
[https://pypi.org/project/tomli/ tomli-w] for writing it. But
{{package|python-toml}} remains available until it is a leaf package,
it will be removed then (possibly not yet in Fedora 38).
From the table of contents:
1.4 Detailed Description
1.4.1 List of components still (Build)Requiring python3-toml
1.4.2 Migrating to tomllib
1.4.3 Migrating to tomli
1.4.4 Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to tomli
1.4.5 Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to toml
1.4.6 Migrating to tomli-w
Perhaps the "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to
tomli" approach should be more strongly recommended? tomllib is based
off of tomli's code and is yet another thing that has to be bootstrapped
during Python rebuilds. python-toml AND python-tomli have been removed
from ELN/RHEL 10, as they're both made redundant by tomllib.
I wonder if it would make sense to also phase out python-tomli at some
point. FWIW, the list of packages that directly require tomli is
relatively small.
$ ./python_toml_deps.py python3-tomli
Runtime dependents of python3-tomli:
1. pyp2spec
2. python3-check-manifest
3. python3-flit
4. python3-flit-core
5. python3-pep517
6. python3-pytest
7. python3-setuptools_scm
8. python3-sphinx-theme-builder
9. python3-towncrier
10. python3-versioningit
Buildtime dependents of python3-tomli:
1. bst-external
2. hatch
3. pyp2spec
4. pytest
5. python-diff-cover
6. python-flit
7. python-pep517
8. python-pyproject-metadata
9. python-setuptools_scm
10. python-sphinx-theme-builder
11. python-towncrier
12. python-versioningit
13. python3-mypy
14. sagemath
Source RPM names:
1. bst-external
2. hatch
3. pyp2spec
4. pytest
5. python-check-manifest
6. python-diff-cover
7. python-flit
8. python-pep517
9. python-pyproject-metadata
10. python-setuptools_scm
11. python-sphinx-theme-builder
12. python-towncrier
13. python-versioningit
14. python3-mypy
15. sagemath
(This list was generated with [0]. Unlike dnf repoquery[1], this script
accounts for conditional dependencies on "python3 < 3.11".)
[0]:
https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/fedora-scripts/tree/main/item/python_toml_deps.py
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132462
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2022-10-17 Fedora QA Meeting
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I know we've canceled a few weeks in a row, but there isn't much going on except for F37 validation at present. There will be a blocker review meeting. If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can run the meeting. Thanks folks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] 2022-10-17 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 37 Blocker Review Meeting
# F36 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2022-10-17 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review, and there's a chance blockers will be proposed over the weekend, so let's have a review meeting. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!** We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F36 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good weekend and see you on Monday! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Current test branch: Error message systemd-gpt-auto-generator[1169]: Failed to dissect: Permission denied
With branch 20221012 as well as 20221014 I get with Fedora Server on BIOS boot
Hardware several AVC events like
type=AVC msg=audit(1665848517.93:288): avc: denied { sys_admin } for pid=1635
comm="systemd-gpt-aut" capability=21
scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_gpt_generator_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_gpt_generator_t:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
I can’t find any impairments from it so far.
I couldn’t find anything about it besides an old bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499479
Does anyone have information on whether this can be safely ignored?
Some Details:
Deploying the ServerKVM immediately after completing the first boot
configuration I get 2 times the message
systemd-gpt-auto-generator[1169]: Failed to dissect: Permission denied
The system proceeds with any problem and finally shows the login prompt.
Accordingly I find in audit.log:
type=AVC msg=audit(1665836956.540:288): avc: denied { sys_admin } for pid=1249
comm="systemd-gpt-aut" capability=21
scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_gpt_generator_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_gpt_generator_t:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
The same happens with a standard installation of Fedora Server on hardware. The
system boots to login without issues. But as soon as I perform a file
operation, e.g. creating log. volume and a filesystem I get the same AVC event.
type=AVC msg=audit(1665848517.93:288): avc: denied { sys_admin } for pid=1635
comm="systemd-gpt-aut" capability=21
scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_gpt_generator_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_gpt_generator_t:s0 tclass=capability
permissive=0
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Current F37 test branch: probably new SELinux AVCs with libvirt / KVM
When creating a new VM on Fedora Server I get 2 AVCs, which I didn’t noticed in
F36:
SELinux is preventing virtlogd from using the execmem access on a process.
type=AVC msg=audit(1665815361.392:451): avc: denied { execmem } for pid=2086
comm="virtlogd" scontext=system_u:system_r:virtlogd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:system_r:virtlogd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process permissive=0
SELinux is preventing libvirt_leasesh from using the execmem access on a
process.
type=AVC msg=audit(1665851006.673:774): avc: denied { execmem } for pid=6252
comm="libvirt_leasesh" scontext=system_u:system_r:dnsmasq_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:system_r:dnsmasq_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process permissive=0
These execmem access violations were virulent a few years ago, but at least on
my F36 servers I haven't seen any of them anymore.
Am I the only one where they are back?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On 14. 10. 22 21:36, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
On 22/10/06, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonToml
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-toml}} (`python3-toml`) package will be
[https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
deprecated] in [[Releases/38|Fedora 38]]. The
[https://pypi.org/project/toml/ upstream toml package] is considered
unmaintained (see [[#Detailed_Description|description]]) and Python
3.11 contains [https://peps.python.org/pep-0680/ a TOML-reading
library in the standard library]. Existing Fedora packages depend on
{{package|python-toml}}, so we cannot remove it yet. Packagers are
encouraged to work with upstreams to switch to
[https://peps.python.org/pep-0680/
tomllib]/[https://pypi.org/project/tomli/ tomli] for reading toml or
[https://pypi.org/project/tomli/ tomli-w] for writing it. But
{{package|python-toml}} remains available until it is a leaf package,
it will be removed then (possibly not yet in Fedora 38).
From the table of contents:
1.4 Detailed Description
1.4.1 List of components still (Build)Requiring python3-toml
1.4.2 Migrating to tomllib
1.4.3 Migrating to tomli
1.4.4 Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to tomli
1.4.5 Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to toml
1.4.6 Migrating to tomli-w
Perhaps the "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to
tomli" approach should be more strongly recommended? tomllib is based
off of tomli's code and is yet another thing that has to be bootstrapped
during Python rebuilds. python-toml AND python-tomli have been removed
from ELN/RHEL 10, as they're both made redundant by tomllib.
Sure, "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to tomli" is the
recommended approach. How do I make that more visible?
I've removed the "fallback to toml" option entirely now when toml is in EPEL 8
(thanks for that).
I wonder if it would make sense to also phase out python-tomli at some
point.
I was thinking about deprecating that one as well, but I thought perhaps it's
too soon for some upstreams. When we deal with RHEL 10, patching tomli imports
to make them tomllib imports seems "trivial" (unlike migrating from toml).
One slight correction: Neither python-tomli nor python-toml has not been
removed from ELN, they will only be removed once not depended upon by other ELN
pacakges.
https://tiny.distro.builders/view-rpm--view-eln--python3-tomli.html
https://tiny.distro.builders/view-rpm--view-eln--python3-toml.html
FWIW, the list of packages that directly require tomli is
relatively small.
$ ./python_toml_deps.py python3-tomli
Runtime dependents of python3-tomli:
1. pyp2spec
I can deal with that one.
2. python3-check-manifest
3. python3-flit
4. python3-flit-core
Flit has been dealt with upstream:
https://github.com/pypa/flit/commit/dba0f317c52
5. python3-pep517
6. python3-pytest
https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/commit/2e8a319828
7. python3-setuptools_scm
8. python3-sphinx-theme-builder
9. python3-towncrier
10. python3-versioningit
Buildtime dependents of python3-tomli:
1. bst-external
2. hatch
3. pyp2spec
4. pytest
5. python-diff-cover
6. python-flit
7. python-pep517
8. python-pyproject-metadata
9. python-setuptools_scm
10. python-sphinx-theme-builder
11. python-towncrier
12. python-versioningit
13. python3-mypy
14. sagemath
Source RPM names:
1. bst-external
2. hatch
3. pyp2spec
4. pytest
5. python-check-manifest
6. python-diff-cover
7. python-flit
8. python-pep517
9. python-pyproject-metadata
10. python-setuptools_scm
11. python-sphinx-theme-builder
12. python-towncrier
13. python-versioningit
14. python3-mypy
15. sagemath
I am slowly walking trough upstream projects and dealing with the tomli
dependency. Chances are, we might get rid of it naturally without deprecation.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On 15. 10. 22 19:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: 7. python3-setuptools_scm https://github.com/pypa/setuptools_scm/commit/ca52f3e86f -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On 15. 10. 22 19:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: Perhaps the "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to tomli" approach should be more strongly recommended? tomllib is based off of tomli's code and is yet another thing that has to be bootstrapped during Python rebuilds. python-toml AND python-tomli have been removed from ELN/RHEL 10, as they're both made redundant by tomllib. Sure, "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to tomli" is the recommended approach. How do I make that more visible? I've removed the "fallback to toml" option entirely now when toml is in EPEL 8 (thanks for that). I've added big warning boxes in the "easy but not ideal" migration sections. WDYT? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On 15. 10. 22 19:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: Runtime dependents of python3-tomli: 1. pyp2spec I can deal with that one. https://github.com/befeleme/pyp2spec/pull/28 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F38 proposal: Deprecate python-toml (Self-Contained Change proposal)
On Sat Oct 15, 2022 at 19:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Perhaps the "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to > > tomli" approach should be more strongly recommended? tomllib is based > > off of tomli's code and is yet another thing that has to be bootstrapped > > during Python rebuilds. python-toml AND python-tomli have been removed > > from ELN/RHEL 10, as they're both made redundant by tomllib. > > Sure, "Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to tomli" is the > recommended approach. How do I make that more visible? I think the admonitions you added convey that well. I would also rearrange the suggestions so the recommended approach is the first thing that people see. Something like: 1.4 Detailed Description 1.4.1 List of components still (Build)Requiring python3-toml 1.4.2 Migrating to tomllib on Python 3.11+ and falling back to tomli 1.4.3 Migrating to tomllib 1.4.4 Migrating to tomli 1.4.5 Migrating to tomli-w > I've removed the "fallback to toml" option entirely now when toml is in EPEL > 8 > (thanks for that). Sure! I started working on tomli for EPEL 7, so that should be covered as well. > > I wonder if it would make sense to also phase out python-tomli at some > > point. > > I was thinking about deprecating that one as well, but I thought perhaps it's > too soon for some upstreams. > I am slowly walking trough upstream projects and dealing with the tomli > dependency. Chances are, we might get rid of it naturally without deprecation. I think that's a good approach. It makes sense to avoid deprecating packages when a gentler approach would work. > When we deal with RHEL 10, patching tomli imports > to make them tomllib imports seems "trivial" (unlike migrating from toml). Yeah, you still have to change the imports, but you don't have to deal with TOMLDecodeError or opening files in bytes mode. > One slight correction: Neither python-tomli nor python-toml has not been > removed from ELN, they will only be removed once not depended upon by other > ELN > pacakges. > > https://tiny.distro.builders/view-rpm--view-eln--python3-tomli.html > https://tiny.distro.builders/view-rpm--view-eln--python3-toml.html Ah, I see; they've been marked as unwanted but not yet removed. > > FWIW, the list of packages that directly require tomli is > > relatively small. > > > > $ ./python_toml_deps.py python3-tomli > > Runtime dependents of python3-tomli: > > 3. python3-flit > > 4. python3-flit-core > > Flit has been dealt with upstream: > > https://github.com/pypa/flit/commit/dba0f317c52 It's been dealt with upstream, but the python-flit package needs to be changed to not pull it in unconditionally. -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Ridiculous new Red Hat Bugzilla password security requirements
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > 9 characters password in 2022 is considered 'easy breakable' thanks to > power of GPUs. To "break" the password offline with a GPU, you need a hashed password to begin with. If I log in securely over HTTPS and if the server is not compromised (and neither is my computer), you do not get my password, neither hashed nor unhashed. So then you need to actually brute-force the password by logging in to the server, the GPU will not help you a bit, and you will likely get blacklisted pretty quickly. So I see this as an absolute non-issue. > Maybe start using some password manager to generate and store long > enough passwords? Well, yes, I store the password in KWallet, so it was not a major inconvenience to have to generate and store a new one. It was just an entirely unnecessary inconvenience. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Ridiculous new Red Hat Bugzilla password security requirements
Sérgio Basto wrote: > please try `pwgen -s 20 1 -cny` Good idea, though it actually accepted the 20-character alphanumeric password without symbols just fine. I believe there used to be a requirement for a symbol, but this does not seem to be a hard requirement anymore, there is a more complex strength check now. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Heads up! OpenImageIO 2.4 series coming to rawhide
Update for Fedora 37 submitted, feel free to update the release notes if you like. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-45e8ca7d85 Thanks, Richard > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
