Re: avr-gcc refusing to link against avr-libc in Fedora 23
On 28.07.2016 13:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28/07/16 13:41 +0200, spike wrote: >> Here's some more verbose output. It's not unlikely that this is a pebkac >> error... > > It is. You, Sir, are 100% correct and made my day! >> $ avr-g++ -v -Wl,-Map,ArduinoTest_cpp.map,--cref -mrelax -Wl,--gc-sections >> -mmcu=atmega328p -o "ArduinoTest_cpp.elf" ./main.o >> -l"/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a" > > That's not how you find libraries. > > Either use > /home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a > without the -l option or use > -L/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz -llibarduino > > But "liblibarduino.a" looks wrong as well, so it should be: > > -L/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz -larduino I've used eclipse to set this up and for some odd reason my "library paths" tab in the project settings is gone. It was pretty late last night and I didn't notice that I've put the lib under the "library" tab (which corresponds to -l) and for some reason didn't see the small letter/capital letter change. I ran so far down a completely different path that I just didn't see the obvious. Thanks a lot for helping me out and sorry for the noise. :) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: avr-gcc refusing to link against avr-libc in Fedora 23
Hi Thibault, On 28.07.2016 13:00, Thibault North wrote: > You're right that avr-libc is outdated. Would you mind testing this > scratch build and testing it with your avr-gcc?Available here: > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6378/15046378/avr-libc-2.0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Thanks a bunch for the scratch build! Unfortunately the error remains unchanged :( > In fact, up to now the Atmel AVR distribution patches have been > included in Fedora's avr-libc package to make sure that we support all > chips. Nowadays, Atmel does not ship patches anymore, but patched > sources of avr-libc, avr-gcc, avr-binutils and avr-gdb here: > http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/Atmel-AVR-GNU-Toolchain/3.5.3/ > The scratch build above doesn't provide Atmel patches, though, this > still needs work, but I'll be interested to know if it compiles in the > current state? It was a shot in the dark since I don't know how I'd investigate further at this point. Maybe I'm missing the obvious. Is there some piece of information that would be helpful to sort out, what's going on? Btw: I've tried the c++ compiler/linker as well, same story... Cheers! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: avr-gcc refusing to link against avr-libc in Fedora 23
On 28.07.2016 13:37, spike wrote: > Is there some piece of information that would be helpful to sort out, what's > going on? Btw: I've tried the c++ compiler/linker as well, same story... Here's some more verbose output. It's not unlikely that this is a pebkac error... $ avr-g++ -v -Wl,-Map,ArduinoTest_cpp.map,--cref -mrelax -Wl,--gc-sections -mmcu=atmega328p -o "ArduinoTest_cpp.elf" ./main.o -l"/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a" Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/avr-g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/avr/4.9.3/lto-wrapper Target: avr Configured with: ../gcc-4.9.3/configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --target=avr --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls --disable-libssp --with-system-zlib --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-pkgversion='Fedora 4.9.3-1.fc23' --with-bugurl=https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thread model: single gcc version 4.9.3 (Fedora 4.9.3-1.fc23) COMPILER_PATH=/usr/libexec/gcc/avr/4.9.3/:/usr/libexec/gcc/avr/4.9.3/:/usr/libexec/gcc/avr/:/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/:/usr/lib/gcc/avr/:/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/bin/ LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/avr5/:/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/lib/avr5/:/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/:/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/lib/ COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-mrelax' '-mmcu=atmega328p' '-o' 'ArduinoTest_cpp.elf' /usr/libexec/gcc/avr/4.9.3/collect2 -plugin /usr/libexec/gcc/avr/4.9.3/liblto_plugin.so -plugin-opt=/usr/libexec/gcc/avr/4.9.3/lto-wrapper -plugin-opt=-fresolution=/tmp/ccui8D2E.res -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lm -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lc --relax -m avr5 -Tdata 0x800100 -o ArduinoTest_cpp.elf /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/lib/avr5/crtm328p.o -L/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/avr5 -L/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/lib/avr5 -L/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3 -L/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/lib -Map ArduinoTest_cpp.map --cref --gc-sections ./main.o -l/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a -lgcc -lm --start-group -lgcc -lm -lc --end-group /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/bin/ld: cannot find -l/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
avr-gcc refusing to link against avr-libc in Fedora 23
Hi everyone, I'm trying to get avr-gcc to link against library that I built (which is just the arduino core library): avr-gcc -Wl,-Map,ArduinoTest.map -mmcu=atmega328p -o "ArduinoTest.elf" ./main.o -l/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.9.3/../../../../avr/bin/ld: cannot find -l/home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a alghough: ls -lah /home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a -rw-rw-r-- 1 spike spike 56K 28. Jul 03:50 /home/spike/workspaceAVR/libarduino/328P_16MHz/liblibarduino.a Yes, the 'liblib' is a bit of a screw up on my side, it's late here, can't be bothered at the moment. Rest assured that the paths and filenames are correct. :) Could it be that the current avr-gcc that's in Fedora 23 (and it seems also in 24 and rawhide) is just not playing nicely with the (apparently pretty ancient) avr-libc version? Something was mentioned here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31740435/cannot-compile-and-link-avr-program-in-os-x We're on version 1.8.0 in Fedora 23 and 24 and apparently version 1.8.1 has been released in 2014 and version 2.0.0 has been out since 02/2016. Any chance, there's an update for me to try out somewhere without having to recompile avr-libc myself? Cheers! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Call for help contacting contributor: spike
On 05.10.2016 12:44, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > It has been a month, more than I expected, so I asked FESCo to consider the > user > spike MIA: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1632 Sorry, must have missed that mail. Just changed my Bugzilla EMail address back to what is was. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check: spike
Hi Fabio, Contacting me should be somewhat straight forward through the email address associated with my user id in FAS or through IRC. Let me know how I can help. Cheers On 14.08.20 16:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > The Java package stack cleanup process continues, and I need to do > another non-responsive maintainer check, this time for: spike. I have > opened the corresponding non-responsive-check bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868943 > > There's a growing list of bugs that are open against their packages: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643710 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863215 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857884 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714899 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331897 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863216 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857888 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863609 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857943 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586304 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413019 > > All those bugs are untouched. Most of them are either FTBFS or > release-monitoring bugs. Some of spike's packages have already been > retired due to being orphaned as part of the long-term FTBFS policy. > > Looking at koji, spike has not been an active packager in fedora since > 2012, with the exception of *one* mkrdns update in 2019: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1473 > > Does anybody know if they still want to maintain their packages > (particularly the Java packages), or how to contact them? > > Thanks, > Fabio > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
How to reach the certbot SIG?
Hi everyone, I've been trying to contact Fedora's certbot SIG for a while now. Back then I wanted to help fix some issues with python-dns-lexicon (which are resolved upstream now and an update has trickled down to Fedora 35 with the latest release) but currently I'm trying to find somebody who's willing to review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019398 I've tried to subscribe to the corresponding mailing list at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/certbot-sig.lists.fedoraproject.org/. The subscription needs to be approved however, so postorious tells me that "You have a subscription request pending. If you don't hear back soon, please contact the list owners." I sent an email to the provided address certbot-sig-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org about 6 months ago but didn't hear back. So next I went to #fedora-admin to ask if maybe my subscription request and/or email didn't come through. I was told to contact nb directly since he seems to be the owner of said list. I tried to reach him through IRC and sent him a mail to the address provided in the fedora user database. Unfortunately I didn't hear back. So does anyone know how to get in touch with the certbot SIG? Is it still existing? There seems to be no mention on the wiki (e.g. here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:SIGs) or anywhere besides the mailing list but maybe I'm missing something. Any pointers are greatly appreciated. Cheers! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to reach the certbot SIG?
On 25.11.21 13:07, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 25.11.21 um 09:21 schrieb spike: >> I've been trying to contact Fedora's certbot SIG for a while now. Back then >> I wanted to help fix some issues with python-dns-lexicon (which are resolved >> upstream now and an update has trickled down to Fedora 35 with the latest >> release) but currently I'm trying to find somebody who's willing to review >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019398 > > You can always write to certbot-maintain...@fedoraproject.org but asking here > worked as well :-) Ah, of course, the only thing I didn't try ;) > I'll check this later this week (please ping me if I don't - lots of other > stuff going on in my area unfortunately). No worries, there's no rush. Very much appreciated! > There is one (minor) issue with certbot plugins though: As far as I could see > certbot upstream will rethink its approach to plugins and packaging extra > plugins for Fedora/EPEL often introduces additional dependencies. The latter > caused quite a bit of work when I tried to uplift certbot to Python 3 for > EPEL 7 (I've completed the builds locally but I still need to submit a few > new review requests + coordinate updates for many more packages). Are you referring to https://github.com/certbot/certbot/issues/6503? I followed the discussion on github quite closely but the plugin I'd like to add does use dns-lexicon. Regarding EPEL 7: If the new plugin doesn't work on EPEL 7 (which is currently the case due to a missing python3-acme and python3-dns-lexicon dependency, there's only python2 versions in EPEL 7) we can always just ship certbot with the existing (built-in) plugins. Since the new plugin is a separate rpm package it shouldn't add any dependencies to certbot. > So I'm not super keen on adding new certbot plugins to Fedora but if we have > some additional hands that of course changes the equation :-) Disclaimer: I'm also upstream for the plugin I'd like to add. So it'd be nice to have (since I also use it on a regular basis) and there shouldn't be any extra workload on you. Also happy to co-maintain python-dns-lexicon if that helps you out. I've added a couple of patches upstream so I have a rough idea of how it works. Thanks again for offering to do the review request. Cheers! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to reach the certbot SIG?
Hi Paul, On 25.11.21 11:21, Paul Howarth wrote: > I'd suggest contacting Felix Schwarz , who > seems to do most of the work on the certbot packages. Thanks. You were right on the money, Felix was the guy to get in touch with. Cheers! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Does anybody know how to contact Mohamed El Morabity
Hi, Mohamed unfortunately doesn't answer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578957 or private mail, so does anybody know how to get in touch with him? Regards, Chris -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Does anybody know how to contact Mohamed El Morabity
On 10/19/2010 09:10 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Chris Spike wrote: Hi, Mohamed unfortunately doesn't answer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578957 or private mail, so does anybody know how to get in touch with him? I think he reads this list, and he is almost always on IRC, his nickname is Pikachu_2014. Thanks! Caught him on irc. Regards, Chris -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
