Re: On XO-1.5 with 11.3.0/11.3.1 -- hang during shutdown?
FYI, The testing efforts (with old v new SD cards are being recorded at http://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1323) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 20:06 +0530, Anish Mangal wrote: On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: - Seems to be related to umount of /home failing. Adding sync ; sleep 2; before umount seems to cure it; that's their current workaround. Cutting the CC list down to only devel@ for debugging -- Anish, thanks for reporting this. Couple of questions/requests: - can you give us the exact patch showing the workaround you are applying? Jerry, can you pls provide the same? Sorry not patching on the fly with this one, just copying a revised file in place via OOB. You could do diff against a stock file and what we're using from: https://dev.laptop.org.au/projects/xo-au/repository/revisions/dex3/raw/olpc-os-builder/sub-files/halt Jerry - very interested in the microSD swap between good and bad units. Let us know how it goes. We just shipped a good SD card to the person with the 'failing' laptop. Expect to hear back very soon. On 12.1.0 the switch to systemd completely reworks the shutdown / umount process; so if it affects Fedora or OLPC releases, the scope is 11.3.x / F14. Very unlikely that we see it, at least in this particular incarnation, on 12.1.0. cheers, m -- mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: On XO-1.5 with 11.3.0/11.3.1 -- hang during shutdown?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:03:39PM +0530, Anish Mangal wrote: FYI, The testing efforts (with old v new SD cards are being recorded at http://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1323) I've found microSD card performance can change slightly as a result of a reflash. On #1323 it seems an fs-update was done prior to the test. If you wish to keep analysing it to look at the differences between microSD cards, then: - make the same number of shutdown tests for both the original microSD card and the different microSD card, so that the difference can be established statistically. - restrict the testing to microSD cards from OLPC that we have qualified. - widen the testing to microSD cards from OLPC that have had little use. - look for difference in behaviour with the microSD card written to in one laptop and used in another ... 'cause I'd hate to find that this was due to fs-update. I predict that this is a race condition during shutdown, which may yield better to analysis with serial port attached. The 11.3.x builds maintain a getty and shell on the serial port, if I recall correctly, and this may still be responsive at the time of the hang. Using that shell it may be possible to find what processes are happening. If that shell isn't available, try adding it. As to what is causing the different timing between different laptops, I predict that this is dependent on microSD card performance variation. These cards contain a FLASH translation layer that processes SD commands and manages the remapping from virtual blocks to physical cells. Their performance can vary. I did consider the possibility of power cycling timing during fs-update, but in the XO-1.5 units you have the microSD power is managed by the embedded controller. The SD card is power cycled by Open Firmware, but not the microSD card. Another thing you might try is run a microSD card in an SD card adapter, see if there is a difference. #1323 needs a pointer to your earlier work on #1033. I found it in mail, but I shouldn't have had to. ;-} -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Passphrase must be re-entered when XO loses then regains wifi connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The issue of sugar prompting users to enter wifi passphrase after a connection is broken and is re-established[1] has been in Sugar/OLPC for some time. The purpose of this email is to understand the causes of this: * Bad wireless access point * Proximity to a wireless access point * Something not working properly on the XO laptop ** Driver? ** Firmware? ** Something sugar specific? Talking with deployments, this is an annoying little bugger, because everytime it happens, the teacher has to run over to the kid's laptop and enter the passphrase. We are getting some reports that this flakey *might* be happening more often with dx3 (and following from that 11.3.x) builds. Therefore I'd like to understand the causes of this and what can be done to address it (at various levels: XO, Sugar, Wireless Access Points) [1] https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1305 Cheers, Anish Anish Mangal Dextrose Project Manager ActivityCentral -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP2Zt4AAoJEBoxUdDHDZVp5ugH/jSa5xeuWmrRaCMC9EqNhm+k /VPdmtYL/qrxQpboiaOiC0Uo4T13ug6xRfFdoUYAo7vOwnjP9RVHuCKeMgfOO/ML EbgNaR4vkuZmO5ruP8vIBSyD6uq59nbiuM12pLOo9RmbGIrTDV2AvWt1Hfy3Y+vQ haAQ0owpAzYbnWjbJpI5Mxyp+9CgdaFNHGOuHEMeY60JNerirddlFjJxVPI35g5X oHH7zbWx9/wREsXeTpHMfMsp+u5pbn1n2/ig2uO8HDaY9ur6/s3WPWrupD0IdSMm lAZ4QEjbIGVk50kA9oIO09gTDjUN1gWnx+6lasmaIh6wNwlM9ZmdEPy5l6oMRzo= =xd0x -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Developer XO laptop loan or buy - Speakeasy project
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Lester Leong lester.ble...@gmail.com wrote: Scott - could you point me in the right direction as far as a good JS/HTML5 framework? Keep in mind that _today_ XOs don't ship with a workable JS runtime environment other than the webbrowser. ...which is a perfectly fine runtime environment. And writing a python wrapper that functions like PhoneGap is perfectly straightforward; the wikipedia and other apps on the XO already do it. As for JS/HTML5 frameworks, there are a bazillion of them. Some popular bits: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ http://enyojs.com/ http://knockoutjs.com/ http://brian.io/lawnchair/ http://sproutcore.com/ (although this is geared for client/server) Lots more random stuff linked from: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Nell/InterestingJavascriptLibraries http://dailyjs.com --scott -- ( http://cscott.net ) ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Passphrase must be re-entered when XO loses then regains wifi connection
Sridhar begins in the bug report by saying that the repeated prompt for the WPA passphrase is due to losing connection. Is there other evidence, other than the repeated passphrase prompt, to suggest that a connection was lost? If so, what connection is it that is lost? When I last looked at this problem, Sugar was being asked by Network Manager for the passphrase, and Sugar was immediately prompting the user. Offhand I don't know what version of Sugar you are planning to ship with your target version for 12.2, so I didn't bother digging into the Sugar network model and view code for your version. But master in git has a SecretAgent in model/network.py that registers itself with NetworkManager as an agent that can provide passphrases to NetworkManager. The SecretAgent does not cache the passphrase, but instead delegates to __secrets_request_cb and WPAKeyDialog which then prompts the user. Perhaps the GNOME equivalent does cache? I don't know. It is worth a test, don't you think? Look at how they do it. The problem with caching is that if the passphrase changes, the agent would somehow have to recognise that the passphrase it had was no longer valid. I seem to recall work that was done in that area within the last few years, possibly relating to inability to connect to an access point after the passphrase had been changed. It may be wasteful to speculate further. You need to determine from logs what components (NetworkManager, Sugar, driver, firmware) are causing the symptom. If you don't have good logs, work to get them. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Passphrase must be re-entered when XO loses then regains wifi connection
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 18:44 +1000, James Cameron wrote: Sridhar begins in the bug report by saying that the repeated prompt for the WPA passphrase is due to losing connection. Is there other evidence, other than the repeated passphrase prompt, to suggest that a connection was lost? If so, what connection is it that is lost? When I last looked at this problem, Sugar was being asked by Network Manager for the passphrase, and Sugar was immediately prompting the user. I faked the loss of connection by powering down the AP until the loss was recorded by NM in /var/log/messages and powering the AP back up. Sugar did prompt for the passphrase, which is already recorded in ~/.sugar/default/nm/connections.cfg, so sugar is not re-reading its config file before prompting the user for input. If you were to cancel the dialog box for the passphrase and reselect the AP you are NOT prompted for the passphrase and the connection is re-established. I'll post /var/log/messages|wpa_supplicant.log from this test in the issue. Offhand I don't know what version of Sugar you are planning to ship with your target version for 12.2, so I didn't bother digging into the Sugar network model and view code for your version. Dextrose 3, based on sugar 0.94. But master in git has a SecretAgent in model/network.py that registers itself with NetworkManager as an agent that can provide passphrases to NetworkManager. The SecretAgent does not cache the passphrase, but instead delegates to __secrets_request_cb and WPAKeyDialog which then prompts the user. I think WPAKeyDialog should check if a secret is already recorded in connections.cfg for the AP in question before prompting the user. Perhaps the GNOME equivalent does cache? I don't know. It is worth a test, don't you think? Look at how they do it. The problem with caching is that if the passphrase changes, the agent would somehow have to recognise that the passphrase it had was no longer valid. I seem to recall work that was done in that area within the last few years, possibly relating to inability to connect to an access point after the passphrase had been changed. Think Discard network history in network-control-panel would be needed to be used to erase the old passphrase, forcing a prompt to the user for new input. It may be wasteful to speculate further. You need to determine from logs what components (NetworkManager, Sugar, driver, firmware) are causing the symptom. If you don't have good logs, work to get them. Jerry ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Passphrase must be re-entered when XO loses then regains wifi connection
Anish Mangal an...@activitycentral.com writes: The issue of sugar prompting users to enter wifi passphrase after a connection is broken and is re-established[1] has been in Sugar/OLPC for some time. The purpose of this email is to understand the causes of this: It's a long-standing NetworkManager issue. See the upstream tickets [1,2]. ISTR there was a ticket were Dan replied in detail, but a quick search didn't turn it up. Checking the mailing list archives might turn up something useful, IIRC it was discussed there several times as well. Sascha [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597889 [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599566 -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ pgpiN5RBeNDgQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: On XO-1.5 with 11.3.0/11.3.1 -- hang during shutdown?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 June 2012 01:16 PM, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:03:39PM +0530, Anish Mangal wrote: FYI, The testing efforts (with old v new SD cards are being recorded at http://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1323) I've found microSD card performance can change slightly as a result of a reflash. On #1323 it seems an fs-update was done prior to the test. If you wish to keep analysing it to look at the differences between microSD cards, then: - make the same number of shutdown tests for both the original microSD card and the different microSD card, so that the difference can be established statistically. - restrict the testing to microSD cards from OLPC that we have qualified. See http://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1323#note-3 for the above two points. We're testing with microSD cards that came with the OLPC laptops (i.e. OLPC approved/validated) - widen the testing to microSD cards from OLPC that have had little use. - look for difference in behaviour with the microSD card written to in one laptop and used in another ... 'cause I'd hate to find that this was due to fs-update. Perhaps this could be one next step. Right now, we're doing (we have one xo-1.5 and two microSD cards, one probably 'good', and the other one 'bad', both OLPC approved) * Insert bad microSD. Flash the new build (using fs-update) * Test * Insert good microSD. Flash the new build (using fs-update) * Test I predict that this is a race condition during shutdown, which may yield better to analysis with serial port attached. The 11.3.x builds maintain a getty and shell on the serial port, if I recall correctly, and this may still be responsive at the time of the hang. Using that shell it may be possible to find what processes are happening. If that shell isn't available, try adding it. That's what we seem to have established in our initial debug (I think it should be present somewhere in the thread history or the ticket). Let me know if you can't find it. As to what is causing the different timing between different laptops, I predict that this is dependent on microSD card performance variation. These cards contain a FLASH translation layer that processes SD commands and manages the remapping from virtual blocks to physical cells. Their performance can vary. I did consider the possibility of power cycling timing during fs-update, but in the XO-1.5 units you have the microSD power is managed by the embedded controller. The SD card is power cycled by Open Firmware, but not the microSD card. The first thing we're trying to establish is that the problem happens primarily due to a microSD card. Once we verify that it is the correct direction, we'll go deeper into debug. Another thing you might try is run a microSD card in an SD card adapter, see if there is a difference. #1323 needs a pointer to your earlier work on #1033. I found it in mail, but I shouldn't have had to. ;-} Its already present in the 'Related Tickets' section on the same page. - -- Anish -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP2eV2AAoJEBoxUdDHDZVpx08H/jY46mT9vRI5Zn530BoeU4GJ 0LD2Ycf/0XWLjVPx7oS6cuySiOV2qWnNFUbh0iRVXOSHjafnm2Xsx2tMZX9t3CRe JR3Yuzz1ymBPaYTK405+Kf5BadIHp6i0cJAG1jMtEvO7VvgQ8AxQCfiHOyjgxYe8 skI7w9xjSpIjB0nT76ePNaGG5FtLKQXMIixhcEbJt8pRoiBOLKYo2N6mEXgfniEU k/UyvIbuMShdQzFJAIcQm8uEw8kZCHp4bQzjh+XMOL/H3eaL6JQT8K1bep9Ps+V6 YnC1D4ggFIm2uFUXy/aag0yaFepDoBvT3g0e66awPT/ZcT3p3+TwF8AlilwVOkw= =GF4u -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Developer XO laptop loan or buy - Speakeasy project
EnyoJS looks legit, just judging by the fact that it seems like the only one that has any examples with heavy-duty HTML5 canvas stuff - which is perfect for something like this. Bootstrap looks like it's better suited for UI though. Correct me if I'm wrong with any of this. Thanks everyone for your help and input. I guess next steps for me is writing/finding a suitable Python wrapper and then spec-ing out everything from there. On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:10 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Lester Leong lester.ble...@gmail.com wrote: Scott - could you point me in the right direction as far as a good JS/HTML5 framework? Keep in mind that _today_ XOs don't ship with a workable JS runtime environment other than the webbrowser. ...which is a perfectly fine runtime environment. And writing a python wrapper that functions like PhoneGap is perfectly straightforward; the wikipedia and other apps on the XO already do it. As for JS/HTML5 frameworks, there are a bazillion of them. Some popular bits: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ http://enyojs.com/ http://knockoutjs.com/ http://brian.io/lawnchair/ http://sproutcore.com/ (although this is geared for client/server) Lots more random stuff linked from: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Nell/InterestingJavascriptLibraries http://dailyjs.com --scott -- ( http://cscott.net ) ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
12.1.0 packages frozen
Hi, 12.1.0 packages are now frozen based on what was included in build 13. We'll continue to take selected updates but only for regression fixes. I've updated the following link with process info: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/12.1.0#Developers Thanks, Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Underclocking the XO 1.75
Dear OLPC hackers, I read the underclocking information on the custom bootloader page¹ und wondered how to achieve the same with the 1.75. I read in the hardware specifications, that the processor should be able to go down to ~400 MĤz, and I’d like to get it down as far as possible. Can I adapt the commands to achieve that? More specifically: How can I get the XO 1.75 to run at the lowest possible CPU and Bus speed? Any help is much appreciated! Best wishes, Arne ¹: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Custom_bootloader#overclock ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: 12.1.0 release candidate 1 (build 14) released
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, We're pleased to announce our first release candidate of our new 12.1.0 software release. Information and installation instructions can be found here: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0 Quick links for those who know which files need to be grabbed and save to USB disks: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/12.1.0-14/ http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/candidate/12.1.0-14/ http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/os/candidate/12.1.0-14/ http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/12.1.0-14/21014o1.zd was not found Sameer This is a signed release candidate that can be installed on all XOs, even those with security enabled. We're looking for testing and feedback on all aspects of the system. Thanks for any help you can offer, and for all the feedback that was received throughout development. Our scheduled release date is July 9th. Please review the Known problems section of the release notes. Some documented issues are carried over from previous releases, but others are new and are things that we will aim to fix in the few weeks before release. Compared to the last 12.1.0 development release (build 13), we have fixed: #11923 XO 1.5 with os13 takes long time to boot the first time and doesn't show the Boot Screen #11925 Linux console gettys not working on 12.1.0 os13 #11756 XO-1.75 - Add ELAN touchpad driver support in kernels Chat updated to v77: SL#3634 Chat text lines offset on screen lower than username Stopwatch updated to v16: Adds Description item to toolbar Words updated to v17: SL#3571 Bad encoding of Spanish text Thanks! Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Underclocking the XO 1.75
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:30:15PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: Dear OLPC hackers, I read the underclocking information on the custom bootloader page?? und wondered how to achieve the same with the 1.75. I read in the hardware specifications, that the processor should be able to go down to ~400 M??z, and I???d like to get it down as far as possible. Can I adapt the commands to achieve that? No. More specifically: How can I get the XO 1.75 to run at the lowest possible CPU and Bus speed? Ensure you are on Q4D16 (or later). Type pj4-100mhz to run the core at the lowest CPU speed allowed by Open Firmware. This configures the core to use the main PLL (800MHz) with a by-eight divider. Other configurations include pj4-200mhz , pj4-400mhz , and pj4-800mhz . Type .fuses and press enter to see the maximum certified operating frequency set in the CPU by the manufacturer Marvell. To make a change permanent, edit the olpc.fth file in the boot directory of the first partition of the internal storage, and add the line after the first line. I'm not sure about Linux suspend and resume. I suspect kernel support is needed. As for Bus speed, what bus are you talking about? http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/openfirmware/browser/cpu/arm/mmp2/clocks.fth is the source code in Open Firmware for the clock frequency change functions. To display the currently configured speed, type .cpu-speed and press enter. This is also shown by banner . -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: 12.1.0 release candidate 1 (build 14) released
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/12.1.0-14/21014o1.zd was not found Thanks, fixed the bad download links for XO-1.5. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: On XO-1.5 with 11.3.0/11.3.1 -- hang during shutdown?
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:09 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 06:51:58PM +0530, Anish Mangal wrote: * Insert bad microSD. Flash the new build (using fs-update) * Test * Insert good microSD. Flash the new build (using fs-update) * Test In your testing, please also control for the version of Open Firmware used at the fs-update step. Good point. Deepak, please take note of it in your testing. The firmware version while testing with the old and new microSD cards should be same. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Announcing Q3C07 for XO-1.5
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q3c06 This release contains an urgent fix for mass production swiftness, a new .os command for checking what operating system build is installed, and a rework of the test menu to assist deployment repair centres. Test reports are encouraged. Fixes - revert ASIX USB ethernet physical interface power down fixes made earlier, as they cause delays when downloading deployment keys in mass production, - add visual response to escape key when in secure mode, ticket #11609, - fix to vocabulary search order while in telnetd, ticket #11926, - rework of test menu for USB ports, ticket #11845, - keep menu visible after automatic tests, ticket #11847, - restore audio test sweep volume to original level, ticket #11846, - test menu, enable ALPS touchpad driver, ticket #11902, - add .os command for test bed management, - remove USB serial adapter keyboard support, ticket #11871 and ticket #11887. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
XO-1 update to 885
With the opportunity of 12.1.0/os14 update in the one of my XO-1s, I also tried to update my F14 XO-1 to 11.3.1/os885 but I get `can not download update contents' Indeed rsync://updates.laptop.org/ does not list build-885. Actually the only 885 build there is the for the XO-1.75. Gave it some time in case it pulls it after the request, but no result :-/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
RE: XO-1 update to 885
The 885 are for XO-1: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/os/candidate/885/ XO-1.5: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/candidate/885/ and XO-1.75: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/885/ Regards! Alan Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:35:20 -0700 From: mavrot...@yahoo.com Subject: XO-1 update to 885 To: devel@lists.laptop.org With the opportunity of 12.1.0/os14 update in the one of my XO-1s, I also tried to update my F14 XO-1 to 11.3.1/os885 but I get `can not download update contents' Indeed rsync://updates.laptop.org/ does not list build-885. Actually the only 885 build there is the for the XO-1.75. Gave it some time in case it pulls it after the request, but no result :-/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
RE: XO-1 update to 885
Thanks.But I do not want to reflash the XO. Just to update it with olpc-update. --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: From: Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: XO-1 update to 885 To: mavrot...@yahoo.com, devel@lists.laptop.org Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 12:39 AM The 885 are for XO-1: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/os/candidate/885/ XO-1.5: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.5/os/candidate/885/ and XO-1.75: http://download.laptop.org/xo-1.75/os/candidate/885/ Regards! Alan Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:35:20 -0700 From: mavrot...@yahoo.com Subject: XO-1 update to 885 To: devel@lists.laptop.org With the opportunity of 12.1.0/os14 update in the one of my XO-1s, I also tried to update my F14 XO-1 to 11.3.1/os885 but I get `can not download update contents' Indeed rsync://updates.laptop.org/ does not list build-885. Actually the only 885 build there is the for the XO-1.75. Gave it some time in case it pulls it after the request, but no result :-/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: XO-1 update to 885
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:35:20PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: With the opportunity of 12.1.0/os14 update in the one of my XO-1s, I also tried to update my F14 XO-1 to 11.3.1/os885 but I get `can not download update contents' Indeed rsync://updates.laptop.org/ does not list build-885. Actually the only 885 build there is the for the XO-1.75. Gave it some time in case it pulls it after the request, but no result :-/ It pulls in at time of request, but you have to make the right request. (I would not use online update with an XO-1 because the amount of effort to make free space exceeds the time it would take to download an installation kit. But, please do test it if you can, and report your results.) You said you used updates.laptop.org via rsync to test for the presence of a build. updates.laptop.org uses rsync but is not an ordinary rsync server ... while you can use the displayed list as evidence of a build existing, you can't use the list as evidence of a build missing. This is because when a name is presented, it looks for the build in another place. You aren't shown that other place. Given that the existing name for XO-1.75 is build-candidate_xo1.75-885 it is likely that the correct name for XO-1 would be build-candidate_xo1-885 ... I've tried this, and got a suitably long delay while the updates.laptop.org server unpacked the build, and the response looks good. So please try sudo olpc-update candidate_xo1-885 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0#XO-1_2 -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: XO-1 update to 885
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:56:24PM +1000, James Cameron wrote: [...] So please try sudo olpc-update candidate_xo1-885 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0#XO-1_2 Sorry, wrong link. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/11.3.1#XO-1_2 -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
