On 8 October 2012 16:56, Jerry Vonau <je...@laptop.org.au> wrote: > > > On 6 October 2012 13:27, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hmm. I thought activities.sugarlabs.org was a bit smarter than that. >> That said, the bundle could have come from elsewhere. >> > > Well it is if you use browse to view activities.sugarlabs.org, but I suspect > the activity was downloaded to a usbkey on a different machine then auto > installed by launching it from the usbkey. Think the real fix might run deep > into sugar's inner workings, some discussion at > http://sugardextrose.org/issues/1532
This is one of our greatest sources of technical support troubles. People install incompatible bundles, sometimes over an existing working one. If the activity is protected (which we do for our core set), it can't be removed or downgraded easily. IMHO the system should tell the user if the bundle they're installing is not compatible with the OS/Sugar version they have installed. Sridhar Sridhar Dhanapalan Engineering Manager One Laptop per Child Australia _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
