Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > I'm seeing the same errors in the install log as Sameer while installing > on an XO. openssl does not get installed, because uname returns as an > i586 while there is no openssl.586 in the repo just .686. Just to backup > my hunch note that a 586 kernel gets installed as recorded in the > install log. "yum repolist" returns the same error as mentioned in the > BZ on the XO. I see Sameer's confirmation. You struck gold with that diagnosis. On the XO OS we have the same problem, and a quick check reveals that we ship openssl i686 on the XS. The disk image build happens on xs-dev which reports i686 surely, but it runs on the XO. Can't find anything in the list archives on the matter. h. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 10:19 -0800, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 23:30 -0800, Sameer Verma wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Martin Langhoff > >> > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > >> >>> was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the > >> >>> dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses > >> >>> to show up. > >> >> > >> >> Strange, but it does look like a driver problem. > >> >> > >> >> The links you provide show various different problems with that NIC. > >> >> In some cases, irqpoll in the kernel boot line fixes, in others some > >> >> fiddling with ethtool was needed... > >> >> > >> >> It'll be good to know which of the fixes helps you :-) > >> > > >> > appending irqpoll has fixed that problem. Now, I've hit another bug. > >> > This is yum broken with _sha256 as stated here. > >> > http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=193507 > >> > > >> > I'm going to try the workaround. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> BTW, if you upgraded from XS-0.4, it might be a good idea to rm > >> >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > >> > > >> > No, this was a clean install. I'm running the server for testing only, > >> > so I can afford to wipe it clean. > >> > > >> > Sameer > >> > -- > >> > Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. > >> > Associate Professor of Information Systems > >> > San Francisco State University > >> > San Francisco CA 94132 USA > >> > http://verma.sfsu.edu/ > >> > http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ > >> > > >> > >> > >> So, after mucking around last night and today, I wiped my XS box and > >> reformatted it to remove ALL traces of 0.4 I have a clean 0.5.1 > >> install on it. md5sum of the ISO is c0fde10b93cab3cb1a3bc3a42ceb5408 > >> > >> I've circumvented the realtek 8139 problem by appending irqpoll in > >> grub.conf That seems to work, although I have to bring up eth0 > >> manually and issuing dhcient eth0 > >> > >> I still hit the bug of _sha256 as mentioned here: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454179 > >> > >> Note that I am not upgrading anything. Its a clean install. I believe > >> the appropriate word for this is: AARGH! > >> > >> I wish Fedora had LTS or "Stable" branch (it does...kinda...in > >> RHEL...are we allowed to say CentOS here?) but that's another thread > >> and another rant. It does remind me of why I don't run anything on > >> Fedora anymore. > >> > >> Anyway, this is getting in the way. Is anyone seeing this too? If so, > >> then its a significant barrier for 0.5.1 > >> > >> Suggestions? > > > > Can you post the /root/install.log and /root/anaconda.log or just send > > them to me. > > > > Jerry > > > > > > > > > > > > I've attached both. Note: anaconda.log was in /var/log/ and not in /root > > Sameer Martin: I'm seeing the same errors in the install log as Sameer while installing on an XO. openssl does not get installed, because uname returns as an i586 while there is no openssl.586 in the repo just .686. Just to backup my hunch note that a 586 kernel gets installed as recorded in the install log. "yum repolist" returns the same error as mentioned in the BZ on the XO. Sameer: What does "uname -a" return on this laptop? Jerry ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 23:30 -0800, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Martin Langhoff > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > >>> was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the > >>> dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses > >>> to show up. > >> > >> Strange, but it does look like a driver problem. > >> > >> The links you provide show various different problems with that NIC. > >> In some cases, irqpoll in the kernel boot line fixes, in others some > >> fiddling with ethtool was needed... > >> > >> It'll be good to know which of the fixes helps you :-) > > > > appending irqpoll has fixed that problem. Now, I've hit another bug. > > This is yum broken with _sha256 as stated here. > > http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=193507 > > > > I'm going to try the workaround. > > > >> > >> BTW, if you upgraded from XS-0.4, it might be a good idea to rm > >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > > > > No, this was a clean install. I'm running the server for testing only, > > so I can afford to wipe it clean. > > > > Sameer > > -- > > Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. > > Associate Professor of Information Systems > > San Francisco State University > > San Francisco CA 94132 USA > > http://verma.sfsu.edu/ > > http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ > > > > > So, after mucking around last night and today, I wiped my XS box and > reformatted it to remove ALL traces of 0.4 I have a clean 0.5.1 > install on it. md5sum of the ISO is c0fde10b93cab3cb1a3bc3a42ceb5408 > > I've circumvented the realtek 8139 problem by appending irqpoll in > grub.conf That seems to work, although I have to bring up eth0 > manually and issuing dhcient eth0 > > I still hit the bug of _sha256 as mentioned here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454179 > > Note that I am not upgrading anything. Its a clean install. I believe > the appropriate word for this is: AARGH! > > I wish Fedora had LTS or "Stable" branch (it does...kinda...in > RHEL...are we allowed to say CentOS here?) but that's another thread > and another rant. It does remind me of why I don't run anything on > Fedora anymore. > > Anyway, this is getting in the way. Is anyone seeing this too? If so, > then its a significant barrier for 0.5.1 > > Suggestions? Can you post the /root/install.log and /root/anaconda.log or just send them to me. Jerry ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 10:19 -0800, Sameer Verma wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote: >> > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 23:30 -0800, Sameer Verma wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Martin Langhoff >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >> >> >>> was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the >> >> >>> dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses >> >> >>> to show up. >> >> >> >> >> >> Strange, but it does look like a driver problem. >> >> >> >> >> >> The links you provide show various different problems with that NIC. >> >> >> In some cases, irqpoll in the kernel boot line fixes, in others some >> >> >> fiddling with ethtool was needed... >> >> >> >> >> >> It'll be good to know which of the fixes helps you :-) >> >> > >> >> > appending irqpoll has fixed that problem. Now, I've hit another bug. >> >> > This is yum broken with _sha256 as stated here. >> >> > http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=193507 >> >> > >> >> > I'm going to try the workaround. >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> BTW, if you upgraded from XS-0.4, it might be a good idea to rm >> >> >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules >> >> > >> >> > No, this was a clean install. I'm running the server for testing only, >> >> > so I can afford to wipe it clean. >> >> > >> >> > Sameer >> >> > -- >> >> > Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. >> >> > Associate Professor of Information Systems >> >> > San Francisco State University >> >> > San Francisco CA 94132 USA >> >> > http://verma.sfsu.edu/ >> >> > http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> So, after mucking around last night and today, I wiped my XS box and >> >> reformatted it to remove ALL traces of 0.4 I have a clean 0.5.1 >> >> install on it. md5sum of the ISO is c0fde10b93cab3cb1a3bc3a42ceb5408 >> >> >> >> I've circumvented the realtek 8139 problem by appending irqpoll in >> >> grub.conf That seems to work, although I have to bring up eth0 >> >> manually and issuing dhcient eth0 >> >> >> >> I still hit the bug of _sha256 as mentioned here: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454179 >> >> >> >> Note that I am not upgrading anything. Its a clean install. I believe >> >> the appropriate word for this is: AARGH! >> >> >> >> I wish Fedora had LTS or "Stable" branch (it does...kinda...in >> >> RHEL...are we allowed to say CentOS here?) but that's another thread >> >> and another rant. It does remind me of why I don't run anything on >> >> Fedora anymore. >> >> >> >> Anyway, this is getting in the way. Is anyone seeing this too? If so, >> >> then its a significant barrier for 0.5.1 >> >> >> >> Suggestions? >> > >> > Can you post the /root/install.log and /root/anaconda.log or just send >> > them to me. >> > >> > Jerry >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> I've attached both. Note: anaconda.log was in /var/log/ and not in /root >> >> Sameer > > Martin: > > I'm seeing the same errors in the install log as Sameer while installing > on an XO. openssl does not get installed, because uname returns as an > i586 while there is no openssl.586 in the repo just .686. Just to backup > my hunch note that a 586 kernel gets installed as recorded in the > install log. "yum repolist" returns the same error as mentioned in the > BZ on the XO. > > Sameer: > What does "uname -a" return on this laptop? > > > Jerry > > > > uname -a on the fujitsu laptop returns: Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i586 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 14:34:16 EST 2008 i586 i586 i386 GNU/Linux Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 94132 USA http://verma.sfsu.edu/ http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Martin Langhoff >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses to show up. >>> >>> Strange, but it does look like a driver problem. >>> >>> The links you provide show various different problems with that NIC. >>> In some cases, irqpoll in the kernel boot line fixes, in others some >>> fiddling with ethtool was needed... >>> >>> It'll be good to know which of the fixes helps you :-) >> >> appending irqpoll has fixed that problem. Now, I've hit another bug. >> This is yum broken with _sha256 as stated here. >> http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=193507 >> >> I'm going to try the workaround. >> >>> >>> BTW, if you upgraded from XS-0.4, it might be a good idea to rm >>> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules >> >> No, this was a clean install. I'm running the server for testing only, >> so I can afford to wipe it clean. >> >> Sameer >> -- >> Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. >> Associate Professor of Information Systems >> San Francisco State University >> San Francisco CA 94132 USA >> http://verma.sfsu.edu/ >> http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ >> > > > So, after mucking around last night and today, I wiped my XS box and > reformatted it to remove ALL traces of 0.4 I have a clean 0.5.1 > install on it. md5sum of the ISO is c0fde10b93cab3cb1a3bc3a42ceb5408 > > I've circumvented the realtek 8139 problem by appending irqpoll in > grub.conf That seems to work, although I have to bring up eth0 > manually and issuing dhcient eth0 > > I still hit the bug of _sha256 as mentioned here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454179 > > Note that I am not upgrading anything. Its a clean install. I believe > the appropriate word for this is: AARGH! > > I wish Fedora had LTS or "Stable" branch (it does...kinda...in > RHEL...are we allowed to say CentOS here?) but that's another thread > and another rant. It does remind me of why I don't run anything on > Fedora anymore. > > Anyway, this is getting in the way. Is anyone seeing this too? If so, > then its a significant barrier for 0.5.1 > > Suggestions? > > Sameer > -- > Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. > Associate Professor of Information Systems > San Francisco State University > San Francisco CA 94132 USA > http://verma.sfsu.edu/ > http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ > Some more snooping around. I took the same CD and installed it on a desktop with one NIC. This time everything went as per plan. Everything! I have a XS-0.5.1 running in my office with one AA plugged into it and working as advertised. It works great, except that I don't want to lug desktops around to OLPC-SF meetings :-) We have a local school showing up tomorrow. I'm glad that i am able to get 0.5.1 running, so I can recommend it to them. Thanks for all the hard labor, Martin! I'll buy you a few beers if/when you come to SF for moodlemoot. I *strongly* suspect that the Fujitsu P2120 laptop problems as stated in this thread are related to Realtek 8139 driver not working properly during installation. Maybe I should append irqpoll to the grub lines *before* the install CD boots and see how that goes. Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 94132 USA http://verma.sfsu.edu/ http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >> I've circumvented the realtek 8139 problem by appending irqpoll in >> grub.conf That seems to work, although I have to bring up eth0 >> manually and issuing dhcient eth0 > > Good to hear irqpoll works. Strange that dhclient doesn't work on > network start... > Yeah. I'm going to have to figure out how to get eth0 to come up automatically (its been a while since I did anything RH). >> I still hit the bug of _sha256 as mentioned here: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454179 > > That bug is bizarre. I've installed 0.5.1 on several machines without > hitting this at all. No idea whatcould it be - package that reportedly > caused that bug has long been fixed... what versions of those pkgs > does rpm -qa say you have? > I'm attaching the output of rpm -qa Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 94132 USA http://verma.sfsu.edu/ http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ rpmqa Description: Binary data ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > I've circumvented the realtek 8139 problem by appending irqpoll in > grub.conf That seems to work, although I have to bring up eth0 > manually and issuing dhcient eth0 Good to hear irqpoll works. Strange that dhclient doesn't work on network start... > I still hit the bug of _sha256 as mentioned here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454179 That bug is bizarre. I've installed 0.5.1 on several machines without hitting this at all. No idea whatcould it be - package that reportedly caused that bug has long been fixed... what versions of those pkgs does rpm -qa say you have? cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >>> was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the >>> dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses >>> to show up. >> >> Strange, but it does look like a driver problem. >> >> The links you provide show various different problems with that NIC. >> In some cases, irqpoll in the kernel boot line fixes, in others some >> fiddling with ethtool was needed... >> >> It'll be good to know which of the fixes helps you :-) > > appending irqpoll has fixed that problem. Now, I've hit another bug. > This is yum broken with _sha256 as stated here. > http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=193507 > > I'm going to try the workaround. > >> >> BTW, if you upgraded from XS-0.4, it might be a good idea to rm >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > > No, this was a clean install. I'm running the server for testing only, > so I can afford to wipe it clean. > > Sameer > -- > Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. > Associate Professor of Information Systems > San Francisco State University > San Francisco CA 94132 USA > http://verma.sfsu.edu/ > http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ > So, after mucking around last night and today, I wiped my XS box and reformatted it to remove ALL traces of 0.4 I have a clean 0.5.1 install on it. md5sum of the ISO is c0fde10b93cab3cb1a3bc3a42ceb5408 I've circumvented the realtek 8139 problem by appending irqpoll in grub.conf That seems to work, although I have to bring up eth0 manually and issuing dhcient eth0 I still hit the bug of _sha256 as mentioned here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454179 Note that I am not upgrading anything. Its a clean install. I believe the appropriate word for this is: AARGH! I wish Fedora had LTS or "Stable" branch (it does...kinda...in RHEL...are we allowed to say CentOS here?) but that's another thread and another rant. It does remind me of why I don't run anything on Fedora anymore. Anyway, this is getting in the way. Is anyone seeing this too? If so, then its a significant barrier for 0.5.1 Suggestions? Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 94132 USA http://verma.sfsu.edu/ http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >> was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the >> dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses >> to show up. > > Strange, but it does look like a driver problem. > > The links you provide show various different problems with that NIC. > In some cases, irqpoll in the kernel boot line fixes, in others some > fiddling with ethtool was needed... > > It'll be good to know which of the fixes helps you :-) appending irqpoll has fixed that problem. Now, I've hit another bug. This is yum broken with _sha256 as stated here. http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=193507 I'm going to try the workaround. > > BTW, if you upgraded from XS-0.4, it might be a good idea to rm > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules No, this was a clean install. I'm running the server for testing only, so I can afford to wipe it clean. Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 94132 USA http://verma.sfsu.edu/ http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the > dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses > to show up. Strange, but it does look like a driver problem. The links you provide show various different problems with that NIC. In some cases, irqpoll in the kernel boot line fixes, in others some fiddling with ethtool was needed... It'll be good to know which of the fixes helps you :-) BTW, if you upgraded from XS-0.4, it might be a good idea to rm /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Jameson Quinn wrote: > "The requested URL /xs/other/OLPC-School-Server-0.5.1-i386.iso was not found > on this server." It has moved "up" the foodchain. When it went from RC to final release, I moved it up one dir. cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
"The requested URL /xs/other/OLPC-School-Server-0.5.1-i386.iso was not found on this server." ?? Jameson On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Dave Bauer wrote: > >> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPC-School-Server-0.5.1-i386.iso > > > > I checked and the ISO does not appear to be available yet. Should it be > > there now? > > the rsync completed not long ago, so it's there now. Get it while it's > hot... > > cheers, > > > m > -- > martin.langh...@gmail.com > mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > ___ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Dave Bauer wrote: >>> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPC-School-Server-0.5.1-i386.iso >> >> I checked and the ISO does not appear to be available yet. Should it be >> there now? > > the rsync completed not long ago, so it's there now. Get it while it's hot... > > cheers, > > > m > -- > martin.langh...@gmail.com > mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > Hi all, I've been caught up in a new semester, teaching, etc. [paid employment, so can't complain :-)] so I'm running behind testing 0.5.1 I've been running it for a few nights now, and the main frustration was with eth0 not showing up. It looks like I am the victim of the dreaded Realtek 8139 bug. It worked in XS 0.4 but in 0.5.1 it refuses to show up. Some references: http://myy.helia.fi/~karte/realtek_8139.html http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=189165 http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/fedora-35/problems-with-fedora-9-live-cd-no-network-using-dhcp-realtek-nic-how-to-copy2ram-648094/ http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21127353-SOLVED-Just-installed-Fedora-9-major-networking-issues I'm looking into it, but as a result of no eth0, nothing else actually works. This is on a Fujitsu P2120 sub-notebook with a 900MHz Crusoe proc and 384MB RAM. Sameer -- Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 94132 USA http://verma.sfsu.edu/ http://opensource.sfsu.edu/ ___ Server-devel mailing list server-de...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Dave Bauer wrote: >> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPC-School-Server-0.5.1-i386.iso > > I checked and the ISO does not appear to be available yet. Should it be > there now? the rsync completed not long ago, so it's there now. Get it while it's hot... cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS 0.5.1 RC - Last round of testing...
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Join me in one last round of testing for 0.5.1 > > This new release (candidate!) fixes the issues listed here > > http://dev.laptop.org/query?group=status&milestone=xs-0.5.1 > > The 549MB ISO is (or will soon be...) in > > http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPC-School-Server-0.5.1-i386.iso > > the sha1sum is 21b39dc045b8d36de573da165587ea763c74a89b > > The updated xs-config and xs-activity-server packages are already in > the 'stable' OLPCXS repo too. > I checked and the ISO does not appear to be available yet. Should it be there now? Thanks! Dave > > cheers, > > > > martin > -- > martin.langh...@gmail.com > mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > ___ > Server-devel mailing list > server-de...@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel > -- Dave Bauer d...@solutiongrove.com http://www.solutiongrove.com ___ Server-devel mailing list server-de...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
