Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Odd. Did you at least get the mail from Selectricity? -- Luke Faraone Sugar Labs, Systems ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
Hi Luke, I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Regards, --Gary On 10 Jul 2011, at 23:45, Luke Faraone wrote: On 06/14/2011 05:42 PM, Luke Faraone wrote: This is a vote to determine the suggested license for future releases of Sugar. This poll will run from right now until Wed Jun 29 2011 at midnight UTC-4. Sorry for the late update; the reporting mechanism for our voting software temporarily broke. Summary: the winner was **GNU GPL version 3, or any later version**. ## Results Details ## 55 out of 217 eligible members voted, or a little more than ¼. The full results of this election ranked the candidates in order of preference (from most preferred to least preferred): 1. GNU GPL version 3, or any later version 2. GNU GPL version 2, or any later version 3. Don't know or don't care Each number in the table below shows how many times the candidate on the left beat the matching candidate on the top. The winner is on the top of the left column. v3 v2 DC v3-- 34 37 v221 -- 42 DC18 13 -- Based on a sheer count of 1st place votes, v3 received 49% of the vote, v2 received 29% of the vote, and the apathetic position received the remaining 22% of the vote. Full details (and alternative election method calculations) are visible at the Selectricity page linked in the original voting ticket email. Thanks, Luke Faraone Sugar Labs, Systems ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net ___ support-gang mailing list support-g...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
Me too :( And with a gmail account too. Gonzalo On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi Luke, I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Regards, --Gary On 10 Jul 2011, at 23:45, Luke Faraone wrote: On 06/14/2011 05:42 PM, Luke Faraone wrote: This is a vote to determine the suggested license for future releases of Sugar. This poll will run from right now until Wed Jun 29 2011 at midnight UTC-4. Sorry for the late update; the reporting mechanism for our voting software temporarily broke. Summary: the winner was **GNU GPL version 3, or any later version**. ## Results Details ## 55 out of 217 eligible members voted, or a little more than ¼. The full results of this election ranked the candidates in order of preference (from most preferred to least preferred): 1. GNU GPL version 3, or any later version 2. GNU GPL version 2, or any later version 3. Don't know or don't care Each number in the table below shows how many times the candidate on the left beat the matching candidate on the top. The winner is on the top of the left column. v3 v2 DC v3-- 34 37 v221 -- 42 DC18 13 -- Based on a sheer count of 1st place votes, v3 received 49% of the vote, v2 received 29% of the vote, and the apathetic position received the remaining 22% of the vote. Full details (and alternative election method calculations) are visible at the Selectricity page linked in the original voting ticket email. Thanks, Luke Faraone Sugar Labs, Systems ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net ___ support-gang mailing list support-g...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang ___ support-gang mailing list support-g...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/support-gang ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Luke Faraone l...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Odd. Did you at least get the mail from Selectricity? FWIW: I just went through the spam folder on my university e-mail account ( e0425...@student.tuwien.ac.at) where I've previously received the Selectricity messages but can't find anything message about this election. I did however get Luke's announcement on June 14 but hadn't read it until now:-/ Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Derndorfer co-editor, olpcnews url: www.olpcnews.com e-mail: christ...@olpcnews.com ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
On 11 July 2011 03:23, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Luke, I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. I was not included on the members ballot even though I have voted before. Similarly, I wonder if I'm the only one in this situation. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
Hi Luke, On 11 Jul 2011, at 16:43, Luke Faraone wrote: On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Odd. Did you at least get the mail from Selectricity? Not that I was aware of, but I just did a search for selectricity and found a June 15th email [Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding)] Election Begun! again tagged as spam and unread. I'm using gmail, it usually does an excellent job with spam, so something's clearly triggered their filters. --Gary -- Luke Faraone Sugar Labs, Systems ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
RE: [SoaS] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
Hi... I was in the middle of a crowd/parade of houseguests and completely overlooked the Selectricity email. A reminder message from Luke directly to the eligible voters with a catchy, not-to-be missed Subject line would be helpful next time. Sorry I missed this one. Caryl Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:03:06 +0100 From: d...@laptop.org To: support-g...@lists.laptop.org CC: sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; market...@lists.sugarlabs.org; s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; i...@lists.sugarlabs.org; l...@sugarlabs.org; de...@laptop.org Subject: Re: [SoaS] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results On 11 July 2011 03:23, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Luke, I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. I was not included on the members ballot even though I have voted before. Similarly, I wonder if I'm the only one in this situation. Daniel ___ SoaS mailing list s...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Luke Faraone l...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Odd. Did you at least get the mail from Selectricity? It came through on my gmail and wasn't marked as spam but I was busy and forgot about the election. I would have thought there would have been a reminder. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
