Re: WPA Testing - Issue
rasika.karunathil...@gmail.com said: XO was Tested against WPA personal , and WPA2 personal with Linksys wireless router. Router : LinkSys WRT54G Router Firmware Version: v8.00.0, Jan. 16, 2007 WPA Algorithms: AES XO Build Version : OLPC Build 802 (stream 8.2.1;variant devel_jffs2) Initial Test Wireless with WPA Personal - Works fine Wireless with WPA2 Personal - Works fine. What is the difference between WPA2 Personal and WPA2? From the wireless side there is no difference. There's personal which is where you configure the pass phrase on the WAP and there's Enterprise or what ever they call it which you configure a central authentication mechanism such as RADIUS or something similar so that you can authenticate individual users or have the same phrase across multiple WAPs in an enterprise. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA Testing - Issue
rasika.karunathil...@gmail.com said: XO was Tested against WPA personal , and WPA2 personal with Linksys wireless router. Router : LinkSys WRT54G Router Firmware Version:v8.00.0, Jan. 16, 2007 WPA Algorithms: AES XO Build Version : OLPC Build 802 (stream 8.2.1;variant devel_jffs2) Initial Test Wireless with WPA Personal - Works fine Wireless with WPA2 Personal - Works fine. What is the difference between WPA2 Personal and WPA2? I have a WRT54G. It's using WPA2. I don't remember anything about Personal but it's been a while since I looked at the manual. For me, recent good XO builds (800/801/34) all work but sometimes don't connect. Much older versions used to automagically connect to my AP on reboot. Now I have to wait a while for things to time out. Then if I poke my AP (from the neighborhood view), it usually works. Sometimes it takes a second poke. You can watch things by turning on the frame (frame key, upper right) and moving the cursor over the network icon. It's 3rd from the right (lower right corner) on my XO. -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Works for me on a Sitecom WL-174 WPA-PSK network. One of yesterdays joyrides. - Pascal. It's fixed yeah, that's why I'm asking to test it with a recent build. Ticket #5044. It went in joyride two weeks ago. It's reported working in both joyride and 657. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Some people are experiencing problems with the latest joyride, looking like a firmware/kernel regression. See #5485. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Michail, We have two other critical bug fixes that require us to do a build today and get it out asap. I had put the new firmware on that list to get into the new build, but we really have to understand if this bug is real. If you and Ricardo can look at this today (build is scheduled for 5pm), that would be great! Otherwise, I think the risk is too high to include 20.p47. Other thoughts? Kim On Dec 13, 2007 11:41 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some people are experiencing problems with the latest joyride, looking like a firmware/kernel regression. See #5485. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Kim, 1. I don't think that this alleged bug is related to the firmware 2. Even if it is, the benefits of 20.p47 far outweigh the risk of (further) breaking WPA. M. Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/2007 01:42 PM To Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: WPA - testing Michail, We have two other critical bug fixes that require us to do a build today and get it out asap. I had put the new firmware on that list to get into the new build, but we really have to understand if this bug is real. If you and Ricardo can look at this today (build is scheduled for 5pm), that would be great! Otherwise, I think the risk is too high to include 20.p47. Other thoughts? Kim On Dec 13, 2007 11:41 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some people are experiencing problems with the latest joyride, looking like a firmware/kernel regression. See #5485. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Ok - WPA works in 657 and in joyride 1407 in the whole stack (UI to firmware). - WPA support is broken in joyride 1416. - We knew it before and we have now even more reasons to believe this is not related to the firmware (since both 1407 and 1416 run 20.p47 and 657 runs 20.p42) and since WPA worked via wpa_supplicant. - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed WPA support, I mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant anymore. - 20p47 as far as my tests go is ok. It addresses wds and mitigates #4470 (p42 did it actually). It also removes unnecessary probe responses. It is not #5194 resistant yet (Marvell is working on that front and we are testing). -- Ricardo Carrano -- Original Message --- From: Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:39:36 -0500 Subject: Re: WPA - testing Michail, We have two other critical bug fixes that require us to do a build today and get it out asap. I had put the new firmware on that list to get into the new build, but we really have to understand if this bug is real. If you and Ricardo can look at this today (build is scheduled for 5pm), that would be great! Otherwise, I think the risk is too high to include 20.p47. Other thoughts? Kim On Dec 13, 2007 11:41 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some people are experiencing problems with the latest joyride, looking like a firmware/kernel regression. See #5485. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel --- End of Original Message --- ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/13/2007 02:54:11 PM: - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed WPA support, I mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant anymore. Maybe something as simple as actually rebuilding wpa_supplicant? M.___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Kim asked me to post this here. Here is the idea for today's build. Based on 650 + (1) whatever was fixed to make WPA work in UI (2) p47 libertas fw. Premises: - 657: Is not in good shape (confimed by Alex Latham) - 650: WPA is broken, 657 WPA works. - Our tests reveal that 20p47 is the fw to ship. Mihalis just confirmed this. Marco, It seems that you are the person that can do (1), right? -- Ricardo Carrano -- Original Message --- From: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:54:11 -0300 Subject: Re: WPA - testing Ok - WPA works in 657 and in joyride 1407 in the whole stack (UI to firmware). - WPA support is broken in joyride 1416. - We knew it before and we have now even more reasons to believe this is not related to the firmware (since both 1407 and 1416 run 20.p47 and 657 runs 20.p42) and since WPA worked via wpa_supplicant. - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed WPA support, I mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant anymore. - 20p47 as far as my tests go is ok. It addresses wds and mitigates #4470 (p42 did it actually). It also removes unnecessary probe responses. It is not #5194 resistant yet (Marvell is working on that front and we are testing). -- Ricardo Carrano -- Original Message --- From: Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:39:36 -0500 Subject: Re: WPA - testing Michail, We have two other critical bug fixes that require us to do a build today and get it out asap. I had put the new firmware on that list to get into the new build, but we really have to understand if this bug is real. If you and Ricardo can look at this today (build is scheduled for 5pm), that would be great! Otherwise, I think the risk is too high to include 20.p47. Other thoughts? Kim On Dec 13, 2007 11:41 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some people are experiencing problems with the latest joyride, looking like a firmware/kernel regression. See #5485. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel --- End of Original Message --- ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel --- End of Original Message --- ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
On Dec 13, 2007 9:50 PM, Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kim asked me to post this here. Here is the idea for today's build. Based on 650 + (1) whatever was fixed to make WPA work in UI (2) p47 libertas fw. Premises: - 657: Is not in good shape (confimed by Alex Latham) - 650: WPA is broken, 657 WPA works. - Our tests reveal that 20p47 is the fw to ship. Mihalis just confirmed this. Marco, It seems that you are the person that can do (1), right? Yeah, working on it. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/13/2007 02:54:11 PM: - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed WPA support, I mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant anymore. Maybe something as simple as actually rebuilding wpa_supplicant? I'd look first at what changed between builds... If the supplicant hasn't been updated for quite a while (it shouldn't have been) then it's much less likely to be a problem. I'm not sure what a rebuild would solve here... Dan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
On Dec 13, 2007 10:24 PM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/13/2007 02:54:11 PM: - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed WPA support, I mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant anymore. Maybe something as simple as actually rebuilding wpa_supplicant? I'd look first at what changed between builds... If the supplicant hasn't been updated for quite a while (it shouldn't have been) then it's much less likely to be a problem. I'm not sure what a rebuild would solve here... http://dev.laptop.org/~bert/joyride-pkgs.html The only relevant change between 1407 and 1418 *seem* to be kernel. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
md5sum for the supplicant haven't changed. -- Original Message --- From: Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michail Bletsas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:24:14 -0500 Subject: Re: WPA - testing On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:14 -0500, Michail Bletsas wrote: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/13/2007 02:54:11 PM: - Whatever changed between 1407 and 1416 seem to have really crashed WPA support, I mean, now we cannot set it to work via wpa_supplicant anymore. Maybe something as simple as actually rebuilding wpa_supplicant? I'd look first at what changed between builds... If the supplicant hasn't been updated for quite a while (it shouldn't have been) then it's much less likely to be a problem. I'm not sure what a rebuild would solve here... Dan --- End of Original Message --- ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
Marco, Could you tell us, what is broken? The question has two motivations: 1 - What is the support for the issue? Is it It's broken? 2 - What we need to do to make it work in the future. Or are you implying it's fixed in 657? -- Ricardo Carrano -- Original Message --- From: Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:33:09 +0100 Subject: Re: WPA - testing On Dec 12, 2007 11:29 PM, Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! We've been testing association with WPA APs. What follows are results on these tests with build 650. The reason we are using this build and not another (newer one) is that it's been shipped, so we will have a lot of feedback on it. WPA is broken in 650, it just can't work. We need to test it in joyride or in 657 (update-1). Marco --- End of Original Message --- ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: WPA - testing
On Dec 12, 2007 11:38 PM, Ricardo Carrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marco, Could you tell us, what is broken? To make it short, wpa_passphrase is not executed correctly, so we don't write a proper .cfg. The fix was available when Ship.2 was released but we (me + Jim) decided to not land it because we was too near to the release and we didn't want to take the risk. The question has two motivations: 1 - What is the support for the issue? Is it It's broken? 2 - What we need to do to make it work in the future. Or are you implying it's fixed in 657? It's fixed yeah, that's why I'm asking to test it with a recent build. Ticket #5044. It went in joyride two weeks ago. It's reported working in both joyride and 657. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
