Re: olpc os builder
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:54:14PM -0500, Tim Moody wrote: I created an fc17-32 vm and installed olpc-os-builder. When I run olpc-os-builder /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-5.0.2/examples/olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.ini I get 21003xx0.img, etc., which does not seem to be the latest build. I was expecting something like 21021xx0.img. How do I build the latest? 21003xx0.img will have been your latest build. When you run it again, you will get 21004xx0.img. 21021o0.img was the latest build that OLPC ran. It was build 21 of 12.1.0. There's no technical reason to increase the build number to beyond the build number that OLPC used; the file names are not processed. These are different version spaces, as identified by the customization_tag=xx. You may wish to set that tag to ht. See olpc-os-builder modules/buildnr_from_file and buildnr_from_cfg README files for how to control the build number. See also http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home#Version_numbering for how the file numbering works. There is no technical reason to use this numbering. You could call the build file ht7.img if you like, and it will still work. Using the convention does make it easier for people to understand the origin and version of a build. We limit to eight character file names because Open Firmware does not have long file name support when using FAT formatted USB drive. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc os builder
Thanks for this explanation. Indeed when I saw that the next time I ran I got 21004xx0.img I suspected what you have confirmed. However, just to be clear, if I build from /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-5.0.2/examples/olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.ini, will the image be identical to the release, regardless of build number? Tim -Original Message- From: James Cameron Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 5:16 PM To: Tim Moody Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org Subject: Re: olpc os builder On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:54:14PM -0500, Tim Moody wrote: I created an fc17-32 vm and installed olpc-os-builder. When I run olpc-os-builder /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-5.0.2/examples/olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.ini I get 21003xx0.img, etc., which does not seem to be the latest build. I was expecting something like 21021xx0.img. How do I build the latest? 21003xx0.img will have been your latest build. When you run it again, you will get 21004xx0.img. 21021o0.img was the latest build that OLPC ran. It was build 21 of 12.1.0. There's no technical reason to increase the build number to beyond the build number that OLPC used; the file names are not processed. These are different version spaces, as identified by the customization_tag=xx. You may wish to set that tag to ht. See olpc-os-builder modules/buildnr_from_file and buildnr_from_cfg README files for how to control the build number. See also http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_Process_Home#Version_numbering for how the file numbering works. There is no technical reason to use this numbering. You could call the build file ht7.img if you like, and it will still work. Using the convention does make it easier for people to understand the origin and version of a build. We limit to eight character file names because Open Firmware does not have long file name support when using FAT formatted USB drive. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc os builder
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 05:46:33PM -0500, Tim Moody wrote: However, just to be clear, if I build from /usr/share/doc/olpc-os-builder-5.0.2/examples/olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.ini, will the image be identical to the release, regardless of build number? Yes, if every file downloaded to your builder is the same as every file downloaded to our builder. As much time has elapsed since we made our build, it is hard to see how that could be guaranteed. You should test by comparing the packages.txt and activities.txt files in the build directory with our files. Packages originate from the repositories. Activities originate from the Wiki based lists. Let me know what differences you see, in case I have an explanation cached. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now getting this traceback when trying to run OOB: No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it this morning on a similar build. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now getting this traceback when trying to run OOB: No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it this morning on a similar build. It's working for me now also. grrr gremlins ;) Jerry ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now getting this traceback when trying to run OOB: No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it this morning on a similar build. It's working for me now also. grrr gremlins ;) Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be used offline. This is what I did for mktinycorexo. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:48 +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote: Is anybody else having trouble running OOB in the last day? I'm now getting this traceback when trying to run OOB: No, olpc-os-builder has worked fine when I tried it this morning on a similar build. It's working for me now also. grrr gremlins ;) Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be used offline. This is what I did for mktinycorexo. That is what I was leaning towards when I was looking at doing an offline mode, like the staged pungi steps in olpc-xs-builder[1]. Use yumdownloader --resolve to populate and create a single yum repo for use in the image. You could fake this by reusing the cache, run createrepo against the cache directory holding the cache and use a single file:/// yum repo statement in the ini file, commenting out the online repos. Now that OOB caches activities just have to stop cleaning out the temp directory between runs. Think I brought that up when --cacheonly was introduced. Jerry 1. http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-xs-builder/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be used offline. This is what I did for mktinycorexo. Try the --cache-only option. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be used offline. This is what I did for mktinycorexo. Try the --cache-only option. +1 :-) m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:53:42PM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:48 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Yes. I would prefer if olpc-os-builder could operate in two modes; one where it did all the downloads, and a separate one where it can be used offline. This is what I did for mktinycorexo. Try the --cache-only option. Thanks. I have. It used 1482966 bytes. Then I removed --cache-only and it used 267537 bytes. Then I put it back and it used 233312 bytes. It is an improvement, but I don't yet know why. ;-} -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder config file format change
On Mar 2, 2012 6:21 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: I propose that we simplify this: remove the global.modules variable, and make the presence of a section become the hint that a module is loaded. For example: Yes please. It's a common mistake to forget to add the module in the modules list. Some modules, however, only need to appear listed there. For those, I propose _retaining_ the global.modules entry. So for example: [global] fedora_release=17 modules=base,xo1,yumcfg [yumcfg] add_excludes_to=fedora-rawhide Simplifies to [global] fedora_release=17 modules=base,xo1 [yumcfg] add_excludes_to=fedora-rawhide You can also do [base] [xo1] but it looks really dorky. cheers, m ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder config file format change
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: You can also do [base] [xo1] but it looks really dorky. Maybe it looks a bit odd, but I think it is the best option, because it retains consistency, makes documentation/training simpler, and will reduce confusion. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder config file format change
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Maybe it looks a bit odd, but I think it is the best option, because it retains consistency, makes documentation/training simpler, and will reduce confusion. A bit of DWIM won't hurt ;-) m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder config file format change
+1 -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder config file format change
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Thoughts/objections? I'm not an OOB user so I will abstatin, but it sounds like a nice simplification and I am interested to hear from actual OOB users. cjl ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [olpc-os-builder PATCH] avoid loop device collision on shared build hosts
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:18 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Changes the hard coded loop device numbers to numbers that are discovered using losetup itself. Pushed, thanks ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder -- injecting Sugar translations
On 14 October 2010 16:58, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: We have 4 local languages that are not in Sugar nor Linux/Fedora localizations. The plan so far is to start working on Sugar's Pootle for Sugar and Activities. The timeframes don't allow for a full cycle upstream (not even glibc knows about them). How do we inject them into an OS image? I suspect we'll need an os-image-builder module to - frob libc locales list (if required) This already happens based on the configured languages. - install sugar translations - install activity translations The problem with force installing activity translations into the regular place like this is that they'll get blown away on activity update. Is there a better way? Am I missing anything? If glibc doesn't know about them then you'll have to add all the locale data as well. I suspect that is also a prerequisite for adding a language to Pootle. You could look at the code used to generate language packs and rework that into a more generic archive which could be fed to olpc-os-builder. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
I've been helping Hellanio to get his build with kdelibs and koffice. I hit awkward error in preimage.90.core.sh After some investigation I isolated the error when olpc-os-build compile the python bytecode /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/nose/proxy.py:93: SyntaxWarning: assertion is always true, perhaps remove parentheses? Any clue on how to solve that? Best, Juliano On 03/10/2010, at 15:56, Hellânio Costa wrote: Had something to do with the size of the generated image? which limit the image size? Where it stated that (can I change?) as informed before, I can use up to 800MB of memory. If I install all these packages already installed in a notebook the pure system then the right, is soon to be large. already almost to using dd to copy the entire system and generate a image! :) 2010/10/3 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org On 3 October 2010 16:48, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: # also removed some packages in Gnome no need to modify the code, you can use custom_packages to remove them ERROR:root:Error creating Live CD : fsck returned an error! ERROR: Failure in BuildStage: module base, part build.40.imagecreate.py, error code 1 First time I've seen this error. It is also different from the other 2 you have reported. My next step would be to go into the code of imgcreate and figure out where it logs the actual output from fsck. Daniel -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
On 6 October 2010 20:35, Juliano Bittencourt juli...@lec.ufrgs.br wrote: I've been helping Hellanio to get his build with kdelibs and koffice. I hit awkward error in preimage.90.core.sh After some investigation I isolated the error when olpc-os-build compile the python bytecode /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/nose/proxy.py:93: SyntaxWarning: assertion is always true, perhaps remove parentheses? Any clue on how to solve that? Take a look at the file..what's it choking on? If you're compiling with optimizations, see if it compiles without optimizations. Or vice versa if you're compiling without optimizations, see if it compiles with optimizations. If you speak python you can probably take a stab at fixing or at least understanding it. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
Thanks, I will take a look and in last case create a patch for the file. I just though it was a strange behavior. I commented the line in preimage.90.core.sh and everything build fine. Later I ran the optimization on the XO itself and everything ran fine. more later, juliano On 06/10/2010, at 16:49, Daniel Drake wrote: On 6 October 2010 20:35, Juliano Bittencourt juli...@lec.ufrgs.br wrote: I've been helping Hellanio to get his build with kdelibs and koffice. I hit awkward error in preimage.90.core.sh After some investigation I isolated the error when olpc-os-build compile the python bytecode /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/nose/proxy.py:93: SyntaxWarning: assertion is always true, perhaps remove parentheses? Any clue on how to solve that? Take a look at the file..what's it choking on? If you're compiling with optimizations, see if it compiles without optimizations. Or vice versa if you're compiling without optimizations, see if it compiles with optimizations. If you speak python you can probably take a stab at fixing or at least understanding it. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
On 3 October 2010 16:48, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: # also removed some packages in Gnome no need to modify the code, you can use custom_packages to remove them ERROR:root:Error creating Live CD : fsck returned an error! ERROR: Failure in BuildStage: module base, part build.40.imagecreate.py, error code 1 First time I've seen this error. It is also different from the other 2 you have reported. My next step would be to go into the code of imgcreate and figure out where it logs the actual output from fsck. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
Now I'm worried because even just leaving a package in custom_packages error persists. --- os48: * FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED * os48: 33487/49152 files (1.6% non-contiguous), 177284/177284 blocks /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/imgcreate/errors.py:40: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 return str(self.message) ERROR:root:Error creating Live CD : fsck returned an error! * Caught error, cleanup and then bail out. * Running part cleanup base cleanup.50.cleanup.sh... * Running part cleanup buildnr_from_file cleanup.50.write_buildnr.sh... ERROR: Failure in BuildStage: module base, part build.40.imagecreate.py, error code 1 2010/9/28 Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br I did not add anything more and it worked, so the error is in the extra packages that I'm wanting. I'll try one by one then ... =( 2010/9/27 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org On 27 September 2010 20:04, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: Did with custom_packages and even then the error is the same one has any idea which package is giving this error? Have you confirmed that the error does not occur if you make a build without any customizations? Daniel -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
I did not add anything more and it worked, so the error is in the extra packages that I'm wanting. I'll try one by one then ... =( 2010/9/27 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org On 27 September 2010 20:04, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: Did with custom_packages and even then the error is the same one has any idea which package is giving this error? Have you confirmed that the error does not occur if you make a build without any customizations? Daniel -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC OS Builder recipe for forcing OpenDNS resolver
Martin, Isn't a pre-requisite to also remove root? Alternatively have you considered rebuilding initrd signed with ARG keys to check and readd the config on every reboot if it has been removed? Regards, Reuben On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: Working recently in La Rioja (Argentina) we came up with a strategy to enforce some content filtering on the XOs even when connected via random local ISPs (IOWs, when borrowing a neighbour's connection, or at a wifi-friendly cafe). The results are here, in the form of an OLPC OS Builder recipe. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_Builder/Adding_OpenDNS_Configuration Comments welcome. Getting this working involved Sebastián Miranda, Guillermo Narvaez and Reuben. Thanks to all! m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC OS Builder recipe for forcing OpenDNS resolver
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org wrote: Isn't a pre-requisite to also remove root? Removing root is a way to make it stronger / harder to workaround. cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
Did with custom_packages and even then the error is the same one has any idea which package is giving this error? 2010/9/24 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org On 24 September 2010 14:12, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: ok, need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some applications, you see: I edited for convenience only kspkglist.50.gnome.inc You should use the custom_packages module and avoid modifying olpc-os-builder code to add new packages. Try doing a build without modifications first. That will tell us if your build problem is related to your additions or not. Daniel -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
On 27 September 2010 20:04, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: Did with custom_packages and even then the error is the same one has any idea which package is giving this error? Have you confirmed that the error does not occur if you make a build without any customizations? Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
Are you running it as root? On 24/09/2010, at 10:01 PM, Hellânio Costa wrote: Normalize file times... touch: configurando horário de /var/tmp/olpc-os-builder/mnt-fs/dev/fd: Permissão negada I presume this would read Permission denied. Are you running it on Fedora 11? ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
yes I am logged in as root Fedora 11 without updates. So I do not understand why this is giving error! : ( I may be generating a very large image and then the error? 2010/9/24 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org I presume this would read Permission denied. -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
Are you executing osbuilder.py using sudo? If you're using sudo olpc-os-builder have a problem when it executes chroot. You must to try using root user. cheers. 2010/9/24 Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br Hi everybody, I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it returns the following error: os19: 71283/131072 files (0.9% non-contiguous), 386289/524288 blocks * Running part mountfs base mountfs.50.mount.sh... Mounting intermediate filesystem image... * Running part preimage base preimage.90.core.sh... Normalize file times... touch: configurando horário de /var/tmp/olpc-os-builder/mnt-fs/dev/fd: Permissão negada Compiling python bytecode... * Caught error, cleanup and then bail out. * Running part cleanup base cleanup.50.cleanup.sh... * Running part cleanup buildnr_from_file cleanup.50.write_buildnr.sh... ERROR: Failure in PreImageStage: module base, part preimage.90.core.sh, error code 1 can you help me? -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
On 24 September 2010 13:01, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: Hi everybody, I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it returns the following error: os19: 71283/131072 files (0.9% non-contiguous), 386289/524288 blocks * Running part mountfs base mountfs.50.mount.sh... Mounting intermediate filesystem image... * Running part preimage base preimage.90.core.sh... Normalize file times... touch: configurando horário de /var/tmp/olpc-os-builder/mnt-fs/dev/fd: Permissão negada This error can be ignored Compiling python bytecode... * Caught error, cleanup and then bail out. This usually means that there is some python file in your image that is failing to compile (syntax errors or something). Unfortunately the python compiler program logs both verbose regular info and errors to stdout, and we discard stdout, so it's not immediately obvious which file it is failing on. It would be a good idea to post your build config and state your aims. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
ok, need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some applications, you see: I edited for convenience only kspkglist.50.gnome.inc # --- OLPC / UFCeará BRAZIL # # gnome desktop gnome-python2-gconf gnome-desktop gnome-panel gnome-session gnome-terminal metacity nautilus # allow switching from Sugar olpc-switch-desktop # GNOME dependencies. Listed explicitly to prevent equivalent components # from other desktops being brought in instead PolicyKit-gnome notification-daemon # battery applet batterymon # internet xulrunner firefox # office abiword # graphics # audio video audacity totem totem-gstreamer totem-mozplugin -totem-xine -xine-lib # more desktop stuff file-roller gedit gnash-plugin NetworkManager-gnome xdg-user-dirs-gtk # --- plugin flash # swfdec-mozilla alsa-tools-firmware # java java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin java-1.6.0-openjdk # office koffice-suite koffice-langpack-pt_BR.noarch xpdf # --- Dependencias do Koffice -- koffice-kword koffice-core koffice-filters koffice-karbon koffice-kchart koffice-kexi koffice-kexi-driver-mysql koffice-kexi-driver-pgsql koffice-kformula koffice-kivio koffice-kplato koffice-kpresenter koffice-krita koffice-kspread koffice-kugar GraphicsMagick arts dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts kdelibs3 koffice-libs libpaper libpqxx lyx-cmex10-fonts poppler-qt ruby-libs wv2 kde-filesystem kde-settings kdelibs-common libxml2 libxslt lyx-fonts-common openjpeg-libs poppler libxml2-python oxygen-icon-theme poppler-glib poppler-utils # Utilitarios q o projeto precisa tuxmath tuxpaint tuxpaint-devel squeak-image.noarch squeak-vm squeak-vm-nonXOplugins ucblogo 2010/9/24 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org On 24 September 2010 13:01, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: Hi everybody, I'm having a problem when working with them olpc-builder, because it returns the following error: os19: 71283/131072 files (0.9% non-contiguous), 386289/524288 blocks * Running part mountfs base mountfs.50.mount.sh... Mounting intermediate filesystem image... * Running part preimage base preimage.90.core.sh... Normalize file times... touch: configurando horário de /var/tmp/olpc-os-builder/mnt-fs/dev/fd: Permissão negada This error can be ignored Compiling python bytecode... * Caught error, cleanup and then bail out. This usually means that there is some python file in your image that is failing to compile (syntax errors or something). Unfortunately the python compiler program logs both verbose regular info and errors to stdout, and we discard stdout, so it's not immediately obvious which file it is failing on. It would be a good idea to post your build config and state your aims. Daniel -- Instituto UFC - Virtual www.virtual.ufc.br ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: OLPC-OS-Builder
On 24 September 2010 14:12, Hellânio Costa hella...@virtual.ufc.br wrote: ok, need to install the koffice-suite on the laptop besides some applications, you see: I edited for convenience only kspkglist.50.gnome.inc You should use the custom_packages module and avoid modifying olpc-os-builder code to add new packages. Try doing a build without modifications first. That will tell us if your build problem is related to your additions or not. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder repository help
Hi, There's no need to clone repos... when you use image builder or os builder it will download only the required packages. You can also put a proxy cache in between the build script and the Internet (set the http_proxy variable) to make sure that when you go to run the build again nothing will need re-downloaded. I have used polipo for this before and it works very nicely - if you set that as the proxy then to store files whilst running scripts nothing ever gets downloaded twice. Re. downloading itself - why not schedule/run any large downloads overnight? That will likely be required as you won't normally get away with stuff that will download during the day... Regards, -Mike On 03/08/2010, javed khan javedkhan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All i followed the instruction in the read me of olpc-os-builder as 1. install Fedora 11, 2. install the build dependencies: yum install zlib-devel libtomcrypt-devel glibc-headers 3. build the package: make install 4. install the run-time dependencies: yum install python-imgcreate bitfrost now i have some question I want to create local repository, so which files i should download from http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/ there are three folders f11 f11-xo1.5 f11-xo1 there are tons of files there. now what should i do, download all three folders, or download some spceific files from each folder. here in Ministry of Education (Afghanistan) we have a shared 1mb internet which is the main probelm. Regards -- Javid Alam Software Developer and Technical support Officer OLPC Ministry of Education Kabul Afghanistan contact: +93(0)798123451 alternative email: javid.a...@moe.gov.af ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder repository help
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:39:21AM +0430, javed khan wrote: now i have some question I want to create local repository, so which files i should download from http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/ there are three folders f11 f11-xo1.5 f11-xo1 there are tons of files there. now what should i do, download all three folders, or download some spceific files from each folder. here in Ministry of Education (Afghanistan) we have a shared 1mb internet which is the main probelm. The files are downloaded by osbuilder.py and kept in cache/ directory for re-use, so be sure not to delete cache/ directory and therefore each download should happen only once no matter how many builds you run. This might be enough for you without creating a local repository. I've done this on a slow rural connection (3mb) and it wasn't as costly as I had feared. By taking a local backup of cache/ directory for additional builder instances, I've saved much download time. Unfortunately, there still seems to be some downloads of repodata/ that are not cached, so I can certainly see the need for a local repository. If you would like to create a local repository, you could select the latest version of the .i386.rpm, .i586.rpm or .noarch.rpm files. The .src.rpm files are not needed by the builder, so you need not select them. If you are building for XO-1, select files from f11/ and f11-xo1/ directories. If you are building for XO-1.5, select files from f11/ and f11-xo1.5/ directories. You need the repodata/ directory as well. I do not recall how to use a local repository in .ini files, but there's a modules/repos/README file in olpc-os-builder that may help. Regarding slow links where downloads may be broken. There does not appear to be rsync access to these files, but wget --continue works fine. The only problem I can see with using wget blindly is that there are older versions of kernels that are not required. There is little point downloading them. This command is faulty approximation: wget --continue --timestamping --recursive --no-parent \ --reject=src.rpm http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/ See man wget for how to restrict this further. If you can document the steps you used to get everything local, please let me know and I'll add something to the documentation in olpc-os-builder. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder repository help
The repo config that start with olpc_public_rpms_ is downloaded from http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos. This configuration is hardcoded in modules/repos/ksmain.50.repos.py If you want to change it, you should change the line that contains url = http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/%s; % name for url = http://localhost/my_local_repo/%s % name Cheers, Esteban. 2010/8/3 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:39:21AM +0430, javed khan wrote: now i have some question I want to create local repository, so which files i should download from http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/http://xs-dev.laptop.org/%7Edsd/repos/ there are three folders f11 f11-xo1.5 f11-xo1 there are tons of files there. now what should i do, download all three folders, or download some spceific files from each folder. here in Ministry of Education (Afghanistan) we have a shared 1mb internet which is the main probelm. The files are downloaded by osbuilder.py and kept in cache/ directory for re-use, so be sure not to delete cache/ directory and therefore each download should happen only once no matter how many builds you run. This might be enough for you without creating a local repository. I've done this on a slow rural connection (3mb) and it wasn't as costly as I had feared. By taking a local backup of cache/ directory for additional builder instances, I've saved much download time. Unfortunately, there still seems to be some downloads of repodata/ that are not cached, so I can certainly see the need for a local repository. If you would like to create a local repository, you could select the latest version of the .i386.rpm, .i586.rpm or .noarch.rpm files. The .src.rpm files are not needed by the builder, so you need not select them. If you are building for XO-1, select files from f11/ and f11-xo1/ directories. If you are building for XO-1.5, select files from f11/ and f11-xo1.5/ directories. You need the repodata/ directory as well. I do not recall how to use a local repository in .ini files, but there's a modules/repos/README file in olpc-os-builder that may help. Regarding slow links where downloads may be broken. There does not appear to be rsync access to these files, but wget --continue works fine. The only problem I can see with using wget blindly is that there are older versions of kernels that are not required. There is little point downloading them. This command is faulty approximation: wget --continue --timestamping --recursive --no-parent \ --reject=src.rpm http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/http://xs-dev.laptop.org/%7Edsd/repos/ See man wget for how to restrict this further. If you can document the steps you used to get everything local, please let me know and I'll add something to the documentation in olpc-os-builder. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder .iso output - usable@
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Had an interesting question from Sebastian M here in La Rioja... The .iso output of olpc-os-builder (and published on build.laptop.org) -- is it useful? Can it be run in emulation? Has anyone tried? Is it easy to build with an extra (vanilla) Fedora kernel? Personally I suspect it won't work, because it has OLPC's XO-specific Agreed - I don't think the VM compatible drivers are built in. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder config tweaks
I also fixed a small issue in the configuration where public_rpm packages were not overriding F11 updates...be sure to double-check the list of package changes in the next build. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder [PATCH] add a Quick Start to README and reformat
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 13:50 +1100, James Cameron wrote: Tested olpc-os-builder on Fedora 11, and documented the steps required to produce a build in a Quick Start section of the README. Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run make install since that will put things in /usr rather than /usr/local. It's possible to use olpc-os-builder without installing it, so the instructions could be modified that way, but it's probably best to wait for Fedora inclusion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 in which case the instructions become a lot simpler. If that doesn't get completed this week, perhaps its something you could take over. cheers Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder [PATCH] add a Quick Start to README and reformat
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:45:10AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run make install since that will put things in /usr rather than /usr/local. make apparently does nothing, and the README at the time said to use the olpc-os-builder command, so a make install was implied. make install should really use /usr/local or DESTDIR. Duplicating the documentation for the two different use-cases is probably the right thing to do. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder [PATCH] add a Quick Start to README and reformat
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 07:24 +1100, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:45:10AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run make install since that will put things in /usr rather than /usr/local. make apparently does nothing, and the README at the time said to use the olpc-os-builder command, so a make install was implied. make is needed to compile the support binaries. The README was written in preparation for being installed as the fedora package, and is already used for that purpose at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 make install should really use /usr/local or DESTDIR. It already supports DESTDIR but olpc-os-builder itself doesnt support being run in installed mode in anything other than /usr (this could be fixed, but its probably not worth it. lets just focus on the Fedora efforts...) Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: olpc-os-builder [PATCH] add a Quick Start to README and reformat
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:25:13PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 07:24 +1100, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:45:10AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: Thanks, but I'm not so sure about getting users to run make install since that will put things in /usr rather than /usr/local. make apparently does nothing, and the README at the time said to use the olpc-os-builder command, so a make install was implied. make is needed to compile the support binaries. It does nothing. If you then proceed to do a build, many minutes later you get evidence you haven't built the support binaries: Checksum tree tarball... * Running part postimage sd_card_image postimage.50.makezd.sh... Making ZD image for os1003... /sdb/src/olpc-os-builder/modules/sd_card_image/postimage.50.makezd.sh: line 23: /sdb/src/olpc-os-builder/bin/zhashfs: No such file or directory * Caught error, cleanup and then bail out. * Running part cleanup base cleanup.50.cleanup.sh... * Running part cleanup buildnr_from_file cleanup.50.write_buildnr.sh... ERROR: Failure in PostImageStage: module sd_card_image, part postimage.50.makezd.sh, error code 1 The workaround is to do make install, and then ignore the installed files. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
