[Server-devel] RHEL 7.2 released Nov 19 ~ CentOS 7.2 imminent
George Hunt (or anyone else who wants to try!) can help us set expectations in coming weeks around if/when XSCE 6.x may be rebased on CentOS 7.2, instead of the current CentOS 7.1 (1503): http://seven.centos.org/2015/11/rhel-7-2-released-today/ What might CentOS "7.2" offer? Presumably "Security, Networking speed and Container-based Virtualization" similar to RHEL 7.2? If these new security reinforcements are cheaper than therapy-after-the-fact, great =) In any case, CentOS 7.2 (to be named/timestamped "1511" or "1512") gossip will emerge here in coming weeks: https://twitter.com/CentOS http://seven.centos.org -- Unsung Heroes of OLPC, interviewed live @ http://unleashkids.org ! ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Rhel
I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude.Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy?Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic.Thanks.KG ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. If he's a RHEL dude he should be able to get his head around using Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies... Gonzalo On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. If he's a RHEL dude he should be able to get his head around using Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies... Because RHEL doesn't ship with all the packages that Fedora does. We might be OK, I've not checked. Peter On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. If he's a RHEL dude he should be able to get his head around using Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
oob = ? :) On 18 December 2013 16:55, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies... Gonzalo On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. If he's a RHEL dude he should be able to get his head around using Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: oob = ? :) olpc-os-builder On 18 December 2013 16:55, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies... Gonzalo On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. If he's a RHEL dude he should be able to get his head around using Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_BuilderHas the details From: Peter RobinsonSent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 12:36To: Daniel NarvaezCc: Gonzalo Odiard; OLPC DevelopmentSubject: Re: RhelOn Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: oob = ? :)olpc-os-builder On 18 December 2013 16:55, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies... Gonzalo On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude. Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. If he's a "RHEL dude" he should be able to get his head around using Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel -- Daniel Narvaez___Devel mailing listDevel@lists.laptop.orghttp://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
[Server-devel] oatslite under RHEL/CentOS x86_64
We just had some fun debugging of oatslite on CentOS 6.2 x86_64. A quick note of warning in case someone else is mad or foolish enough to try it too :-) The short version of it is: bitfrost is currently broken on 64 bits. This is what an XS based on CentOS x86_64 needs to run oatslite: - latest bitfrost.i686 (from an XO repo) - python.i686 - an extracted python2.6 binary from python.i686 -- I used rpmdev-extract and installed the binary as /usr/bin/python2.6-i686 Using python2.6-i686, oatslite now signs the messages correctly. The root cause seems to be a problem in the Pyrex bindings to libtomcrypt / TomsFastMath. Maybe ctypes would be better here. cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] oatslite under RHEL/CentOS x86_64
Does this effect xs-activation installed on XS 0.7? On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: We just had some fun debugging of oatslite on CentOS 6.2 x86_64. A quick note of warning in case someone else is mad or foolish enough to try it too :-) The short version of it is: bitfrost is currently broken on 64 bits. This is what an XS based on CentOS x86_64 needs to run oatslite: - latest bitfrost.i686 (from an XO repo) - python.i686 - an extracted python2.6 binary from python.i686 -- I used rpmdev-extract and installed the binary as /usr/bin/python2.6-i686 Using python2.6-i686, oatslite now signs the messages correctly. The root cause seems to be a problem in the Pyrex bindings to libtomcrypt / TomsFastMath. Maybe ctypes would be better here. cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] oatslite under RHEL/CentOS x86_64
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org wrote: Does this effect xs-activation installed on XS 0.7? XS-0.7 is 32-bits only. Daniel ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] oatslite under RHEL/CentOS x86_64
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org wrote: Does this effect xs-activation installed on XS 0.7? XS-0.7 is 32-bits only. Yeah, and there be dragons in the 64 bit path, confirmed. I got the burn scars. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
