Re: en_GB in OLPC OS 12.1.0
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote: OLPC OS 12.1.0 is looking good! I noticed that en_US and en_AU are available. We have our language fallbacks set to en_AU;en_GB;en_US to overcome the lack of strings in en_AU. Would it be possible to have en_GB included by default as well? I assume you'll be building a custom OS image, no? m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: en_GB in OLPC OS 12.1.0
On behalf of the kids that I test with ... I'd prefer that we not include en_AU at all if we can't also include en_GB, but I don't know if we have the ability to configure fallbacks in Sugar. If we can't configure fallbacks, we should exclude en_AU and languages for which a specified fallback is necessary. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: en_GB in OLPC OS 12.1.0
On 25 May 2012 03:05, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote: OLPC OS 12.1.0 is looking good! I noticed that en_US and en_AU are available. We have our language fallbacks set to en_AU;en_GB;en_US to overcome the lack of strings in en_AU. Would it be possible to have en_GB included by default as well? I assume you'll be building a custom OS image, no? Yes, which admittedly makes this discussion redundant for those who use our builds. I am only really asking because you have gone to the trouble (thanks!) of including en_AU, which in its current state is only useful if there's an en_GB fallback. This actually makes sense, since en_AU and en_GB are probably 99% identical. Sridhar ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: en_GB in OLPC OS 12.1.0
On 25 May 2012 08:00, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On behalf of the kids that I test with ... I'd prefer that we not include en_AU at all if we can't also include en_GB, but I don't know if we have the ability to configure fallbacks in Sugar. If we can't configure fallbacks, we should exclude en_AU and languages for which a specified fallback is necessary. Sugar allegedly supports fallbacks, but they are not working properly for us right now: https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/999 Our fallback for now is to use en_GB as the primary language. Sridhar ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: en_GB in OLPC OS 12.1.0
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote: On 25 May 2012 08:00, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On behalf of the kids that I test with ... I'd prefer that we not include en_AU at all if we can't also include en_GB, but I don't know if we have the ability to configure fallbacks in Sugar. If we can't configure fallbacks, we should exclude en_AU and languages for which a specified fallback is necessary. Sugar allegedly supports fallbacks, but they are not working properly for us right now: https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/999 Our fallback for now is to use en_GB as the primary language. Sridhar ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel There doesn't seem to have been an upstream ticket filed, so I doubt anyone upstream has looked into it. If I am properly parsing the thread, it seems that the fallback is broken when there are multiple fallbacks: the intermediate language is not picked up? -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: en_GB in OLPC OS 12.1.0
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote: I am only really asking because you have gone to the trouble (thanks!) of including en_AU, which in its current state is only useful if there's an en_GB fallback. This actually makes sense, since en_AU and en_GB are probably 99% identical. Ok, so there's a bug or error in there somewhere. Sounds worth pursuing but perhaps not high pri -- we do have some burning topics at this time. Can you file it in dev.laptop.org, with a bit more fleshing out? I assume fallback works correctly when en_GB is there, have you tested this recently? thanks! m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
en_GB in OLPC OS 12.1.0
OLPC OS 12.1.0 is looking good! I noticed that en_US and en_AU are available. We have our language fallbacks set to en_AU;en_GB;en_US to overcome the lack of strings in en_AU. Would it be possible to have en_GB included by default as well? Thanks, Sridhar Sridhar Dhanapalan Engineering Manager One Laptop per Child Australia ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
