Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-18 Thread Olivier Détour
Oh thank you very much.
And about my other question: will it be possible to disable db
features in b2b_entities via cfg ?

Regards,

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com wrote:
 It seems that you are using sipp to generate this scenario.
 In the ACK, you have a different branch then in the original INVITE.

 Try to use a real client to test the b2b module.


 Regards,
 Ovidiu Sas

 2010/11/17 Olivier Détour chino540off+kamai...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 Do you have any news about my problem ?

 Thanks,

 2010/11/4 Olivier Détour chino540off+kamai...@gmail.com:
 Here is my PCAP.

 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Anca Vamanu a...@opensips.org wrote:
 Hi Olivier,

 This means that the ACK is not matched with the transaction. Can you
 send a network trace with the 3 packages? Maybe there is something wrong
 with the ACK.

 Regards,

 --
 Anca Vamanu
 www.voice-system.ro



 On 11/03/2010 07:08 PM, Olivier Détour wrote:
 Hi,

 I found another bug today:
 If I create an UAS and reject call, the 4XX Reply is resent. I release
 my UAS after the ACK.

 Caller  INVITE---  B2B
           ---4XX
           ACK---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           


 Regards,





 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel




 --
 Olivier Détour




 --
 Olivier Détour

 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Olivier Détour

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-18 Thread Anca Vamanu

Hi Olivier,

Please add a feature request for this on the sourceforge opensips page 
and if we will find time and resources we will implement this.


Regards,

--
Anca Vamanu
www.voice-system.ro



On 11/18/2010 11:03 AM, Olivier Détour wrote:

Oh thank you very much.
And about my other question: will it be possible to disable db
features in b2b_entities via cfg ?

Regards,

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Ovidiu Saso...@voipembedded.com  wrote:
   

It seems that you are using sipp to generate this scenario.
In the ACK, you have a different branch then in the original INVITE.

Try to use a real client to test the b2b module.


Regards,
Ovidiu Sas

2010/11/17 Olivier Détourchino540off+kamai...@gmail.com:
 

Hi,

Do you have any news about my problem ?

Thanks,

2010/11/4 Olivier Détourchino540off+kamai...@gmail.com:
   

Here is my PCAP.

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Anca Vamanua...@opensips.org  wrote:
 

Hi Olivier,

This means that the ACK is not matched with the transaction. Can you
send a network trace with the 3 packages? Maybe there is something wrong
with the ACK.

Regards,

--
Anca Vamanu
www.voice-system.ro



On 11/03/2010 07:08 PM, Olivier Détour wrote:
   

Hi,

I found another bug today:
If I create an UAS and reject call, the 4XX Reply is resent. I release
my UAS after the ACK.

Caller  INVITE---B2B
   ---4XX
   ACK---
   -- 4XX---
   -- 4XX---
   -- 4XX---
   -- 4XX---
   


Regards,


 



___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

   



--
Olivier Détour

 



--
Olivier Détour

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

   

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
 


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-17 Thread Olivier Détour
Hi,

Do you have any news about my problem ?

Thanks,

2010/11/4 Olivier Détour chino540off+kamai...@gmail.com:
 Here is my PCAP.

 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Anca Vamanu a...@opensips.org wrote:
 Hi Olivier,

 This means that the ACK is not matched with the transaction. Can you
 send a network trace with the 3 packages? Maybe there is something wrong
 with the ACK.

 Regards,

 --
 Anca Vamanu
 www.voice-system.ro



 On 11/03/2010 07:08 PM, Olivier Détour wrote:
 Hi,

 I found another bug today:
 If I create an UAS and reject call, the 4XX Reply is resent. I release
 my UAS after the ACK.

 Caller  INVITE---  B2B
           ---4XX
           ACK---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           


 Regards,





 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel




 --
 Olivier Détour




-- 
Olivier Détour

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-17 Thread Ovidiu Sas
It seems that you are using sipp to generate this scenario.
In the ACK, you have a different branch then in the original INVITE.

Try to use a real client to test the b2b module.


Regards,
Ovidiu Sas

2010/11/17 Olivier Détour chino540off+kamai...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 Do you have any news about my problem ?

 Thanks,

 2010/11/4 Olivier Détour chino540off+kamai...@gmail.com:
 Here is my PCAP.

 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Anca Vamanu a...@opensips.org wrote:
 Hi Olivier,

 This means that the ACK is not matched with the transaction. Can you
 send a network trace with the 3 packages? Maybe there is something wrong
 with the ACK.

 Regards,

 --
 Anca Vamanu
 www.voice-system.ro



 On 11/03/2010 07:08 PM, Olivier Détour wrote:
 Hi,

 I found another bug today:
 If I create an UAS and reject call, the 4XX Reply is resent. I release
 my UAS after the ACK.

 Caller  INVITE---  B2B
           ---4XX
           ACK---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           


 Regards,





 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel




 --
 Olivier Détour




 --
 Olivier Détour

 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-04 Thread Anca Vamanu
Hi,

Please update the code from svn trunk- I have fixed this issue with 
Update in the commit I made yesterday.

Regards,

-- 
Anca Vamanu
www.voice-system.ro



On 11/03/2010 03:15 PM, Emmanuel BUU wrote:
Le 02/11/10 17:46, Olivier Détour a écrit :

 Hi,

 I'm using v1.6 from SVN, and I would like to report an UPDATE in my
 b2b client module, but entities reply on INVITE with 491 error code.
 Here is my test (from RFC 3311):

 Caller  INVITE---   B2B
 ---180
 --UPDATE--
 -- 491---

 In sources, this reply happen when the call state is proceeding, but I
 don't think it is RFC compliant ?

  
 Hello,

 To my knowledge, it is RFC compliant. UDPATE has been added to enable
 call to be reconfigured before and after dialog is open.
 This is the main difference with re - INVITE

 Emmanuel


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-04 Thread Anca Vamanu
Hi Olivier,

This means that the ACK is not matched with the transaction. Can you 
send a network trace with the 3 packages? Maybe there is something wrong 
with the ACK.

Regards,

-- 
Anca Vamanu
www.voice-system.ro



On 11/03/2010 07:08 PM, Olivier Détour wrote:
 Hi,

 I found another bug today:
 If I create an UAS and reject call, the 4XX Reply is resent. I release
 my UAS after the ACK.

 Caller  INVITE---  B2B
   ---4XX
   ACK---
   -- 4XX---
   -- 4XX---
   -- 4XX---
   -- 4XX---
   


 Regards,





___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-04 Thread Olivier Détour
Here is my PCAP.

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Anca Vamanu a...@opensips.org wrote:
 Hi Olivier,

 This means that the ACK is not matched with the transaction. Can you
 send a network trace with the 3 packages? Maybe there is something wrong
 with the ACK.

 Regards,

 --
 Anca Vamanu
 www.voice-system.ro



 On 11/03/2010 07:08 PM, Olivier Détour wrote:
 Hi,

 I found another bug today:
 If I create an UAS and reject call, the 4XX Reply is resent. I release
 my UAS after the ACK.

 Caller  INVITE---  B2B
           ---4XX
           ACK---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           -- 4XX---
           


 Regards,





 ___
 Devel mailing list
 Devel@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel




-- 
Olivier Détour


404_not_found.pcap
Description: Binary data
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


[OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-02 Thread Olivier Détour
Hi,

I'm using v1.6 from SVN, and I would like to report an UPDATE in my
b2b client module, but entities reply on INVITE with 491 error code.
Here is my test (from RFC 3311):

Caller  INVITE--- B2B
  ---180
  --UPDATE--
  -- 491---

In sources, this reply happen when the call state is proceeding, but I
don't think it is RFC compliant ?

I saw you added DB binding in entities, but this feature is set by
default. Would you make it configurable (use it or not) ?

Thanks you,

Regards,

-- 
Olivier Détour

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] About b2b_entities

2010-11-02 Thread Anca Vamanu
Hi Olivier,



On 11/02/2010 06:46 PM, Olivier Détour wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm using v1.6 from SVN, and I would like to report an UPDATE in my
 b2b client module, but entities reply on INVITE with 491 error code.
 Here is my test (from RFC 3311):

 Caller  INVITE---  B2B
---180
--UPDATE--
-- 491---

 In sources, this reply happen when the call state is proceeding, but I
 don't think it is RFC compliant ?


This is an issue I know about, I will have to fix it. I will let you 
know when it's done.
 I saw you added DB binding in entities, but this feature is set by
 default. Would you make it configurable (use it or not) ?

I can make it configurable sure..
 Thanks you,

 Regards,



Regards,

-- 
Anca Vamanu
www.voice-system.ro


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel