Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Georgescu wrote: > For the lack of other pragmatic methods I would implement the following: > > A. Suport in OpenXCAP server a new auid, document name dialog-rules > with the clear purpose of providing an authorization policy for dialog > Event > B. Setup the OpenSIPS PA module that handles the dialog event to read > it in order to apply a policy, the same as presence_xml does with pres- > rules > > Does anyone see a problem with this approach? It makes sense. -- Victor Pascual Ávila ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
2009/7/7 Adrian Georgescu : >> I think that is the expected approach :) >> However, I would like to receive replies in sip-implementors. > > I thought we are the SIP implementors ;-) 100% agree :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
On Jul 7, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2009/7/7 Adrian Georgescu : >> For the lack of other pragmatic methods I would implement the >> following: >> >> A. Suport in OpenXCAP server a new auid, document name dialog-rules >> with the >> clear purpose of providing an authorization policy for dialog Event >> B. Setup the OpenSIPS PA module that handles the dialog event to >> read it in >> order to apply a policy, the same as presence_xml does with pres- >> rules >> >> Does anyone see a problem with this approach? > > I think that is the expected approach :) > However, I would like to receive replies in sip-implementors. I thought we are the SIP implementors ;-) Adrian ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
2009/7/7 Adrian Georgescu : > For the lack of other pragmatic methods I would implement the following: > > A. Suport in OpenXCAP server a new auid, document name dialog-rules with the > clear purpose of providing an authorization policy for dialog Event > B. Setup the OpenSIPS PA module that handles the dialog event to read it in > order to apply a policy, the same as presence_xml does with pres-rules > > Does anyone see a problem with this approach? I think that is the expected approach :) However, I would like to receive replies in sip-implementors. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
For the lack of other pragmatic methods I would implement the following: A. Suport in OpenXCAP server a new auid, document name dialog-rules with the clear purpose of providing an authorization policy for dialog Event B. Setup the OpenSIPS PA module that handles the dialog event to read it in order to apply a policy, the same as presence_xml does with pres- rules Does anyone see a problem with this approach? Adrian On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2009/7/7 Iñaki Baz Castillo : >> 2009/7/7 Adrian Georgescu : >>> I have a question about the policy for subscriptions to dialog >>> state. >>> How should this be done? Would a new pres-rules document make sense >>> for this. Like dialog-rules, same schema. >>> >>> I could not find any normative specification, did someone find >>> something related to this? >> >> Hi Adrian, recently I've read all the XCAP related RFC's and >> documents >> and found no info at all about RFC 4235. It seems that XCAP is just >> defined for SIMPLE presence (events "presence", "presence.watcher" >> and >> so). >> >> In section 6 of RFC 5025 (pres-rules) there is an example of XML >> document in which there is no keyword "presence" at all, so I assume >> it is intended just for "presence" event :( >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5025#section-6 >> >> However, would opensips presence module ask for such authorization >> rules to the XCAP server if the SUBSCRIBE event is different than >> "presence"? > > Adrian, since I'm also interested in this exotic topic, I've started a > thread in sip-implementors: > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2009-July/023106.html > > Feel free to join it :) > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
2009/7/7 Iñaki Baz Castillo : > 2009/7/7 Adrian Georgescu : >> I have a question about the policy for subscriptions to dialog state. >> How should this be done? Would a new pres-rules document make sense >> for this. Like dialog-rules, same schema. >> >> I could not find any normative specification, did someone find >> something related to this? > > Hi Adrian, recently I've read all the XCAP related RFC's and documents > and found no info at all about RFC 4235. It seems that XCAP is just > defined for SIMPLE presence (events "presence", "presence.watcher" and > so). > > In section 6 of RFC 5025 (pres-rules) there is an example of XML > document in which there is no keyword "presence" at all, so I assume > it is intended just for "presence" event :( > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5025#section-6 > > However, would opensips presence module ask for such authorization > rules to the XCAP server if the SUBSCRIBE event is different than > "presence"? Adrian, since I'm also interested in this exotic topic, I've started a thread in sip-implementors: https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2009-July/023106.html Feel free to join it :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
2009/7/7 Adrian Georgescu : > I have a question about the policy for subscriptions to dialog state. > How should this be done? Would a new pres-rules document make sense > for this. Like dialog-rules, same schema. > > I could not find any normative specification, did someone find > something related to this? Hi Adrian, recently I've read all the XCAP related RFC's and documents and found no info at all about RFC 4235. It seems that XCAP is just defined for SIMPLE presence (events "presence", "presence.watcher" and so). In section 6 of RFC 5025 (pres-rules) there is an example of XML document in which there is no keyword "presence" at all, so I assume it is intended just for "presence" event :( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5025#section-6 However, would opensips presence module ask for such authorization rules to the XCAP server if the SUBSCRIBE event is different than "presence"? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSIPS-Devel] Access rules for dialog state?
I have a question about the policy for subscriptions to dialog state. How should this be done? Would a new pres-rules document make sense for this. Like dialog-rules, same schema. I could not find any normative specification, did someone find something related to this? Regards, Adrian ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
