Re: prep for 1.0.1

2018-02-27 Thread Matthew Selsky via devel
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 02:10:25AM -0600, Richard Laager via devel wrote:
> On 02/20/2018 09:19 PM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote:
> > I'll get on the tracker and swat a bunch of small issues I see.
> 
> I'd like to suggest the following:
> 
> 1) Move #55 out of 1.0.0 milestone.
> 2) Close the 0.9.4, 0.9.5, and 1.0 release milestones, since those
> releases have already happened.
> 3) Optionally, create a 1.0.1 milestone and move things into it that are
> legitimate blockers.
> 
> I'm not sure if the "After 1.0" milestone is accomplishing anything any
> more.

Hey Richard,

I've done #1, #2 and #3.  And I closed "After 1.0"

Anyone with access to add milestone tags to issues should feel free to do so.  
Or propose tagging to the list and I'll apply them for those without access.

Cheers,
-Matt
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: More gitlab quirks: What is this trying to tell me?

2018-02-27 Thread Matthew Selsky via devel
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:39:32PM -0500, Matthew Selsky via devel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:18:10PM -0800, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> > > Yeah, it pushes the web pages.
> > 
> > Should I just ignore it?
> > 
> > Or tell somebody?  If so, who?  What would they do?
> > 
> > Any idea why I'm getting pairs of messages?
> 
> gitlab infrax flakiness...
> 
> This CI job is at 
> https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml#L1  It deploys 
> our documentation web tree to ntpsec.gitlab.io/doc.ntpsec.org (not currently 
> in use).  Our production doc tree is served from docs.ntpsec.org and this is 
> generated from our buildbot CI system.
> 
> I'll mark this job as "allow_failure: true" to avoid these scary messages 
> while the jobs are not yet critical.  We can remove the line once we decide 
> to move the doc tree generation from buildbot to gitlab CI.

CI job updated per 
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/commit/f69f428edfabaaab4fc82a11aec800bc714275be

Cheers,
-Matt
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: More gitlab quirks: What is this trying to tell me?

2018-02-27 Thread Matthew Selsky via devel
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:18:10PM -0800, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> > Yeah, it pushes the web pages.
> 
> Should I just ignore it?
> 
> Or tell somebody?  If so, who?  What would they do?
> 
> Any idea why I'm getting pairs of messages?

gitlab infrax flakiness...

This CI job is at 
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml#L1  It deploys our 
documentation web tree to ntpsec.gitlab.io/doc.ntpsec.org (not currently in 
use).  Our production doc tree is served from docs.ntpsec.org and this is 
generated from our buildbot CI system.

I'll mark this job as "allow_failure: true" to avoid these scary messages while 
the jobs are not yet critical.  We can remove the line once we decide to move 
the doc tree generation from buildbot to gitlab CI.


Cheers,
-Matt
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: More gitlab quirks: What is this trying to tell me?

2018-02-27 Thread Hal Murray via devel
> Yeah, it pushes the web pages.

Should I just ignore it?

Or tell somebody?  If so, who?  What would they do?

Any idea why I'm getting pairs of messages?


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: More gitlab quirks: What is this trying to tell me?

2018-02-27 Thread Gary E. Miller via devel
Yo Jason!

Yeah, it pushes the web pages.

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:57:56 -0500
Jason Azze via devel  wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Hal Murray via devel
>  wrote:
> >  
> 
> > What does "pages:deploy" do?  On the diagram of all the steps, it's
> > the lower of the pair on the right.
> >  
> 
> It looks like it is a CI job dedicated to:
> 
> python ./waf configure --enable-doc --prefix=/tmp/docbot-local
> --htmldir=`pwd`/public/latest/ build install
> 
> I discovered this by examining the console output of one of the
> successful runs. The failed build you saw doesn't provide any useful
> diagnostic info that I can see. I suspect it was a transient failure
> in the CI system on gitlab.
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 




RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin


pgpBsnzekRWF9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: More gitlab quirks: What is this trying to tell me?

2018-02-27 Thread Jason Azze via devel
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Hal Murray via devel  wrote:
>

> What does "pages:deploy" do?  On the diagram of all the steps, it's the lower
> of the pair on the right.
>

It looks like it is a CI job dedicated to:

python ./waf configure --enable-doc --prefix=/tmp/docbot-local
--htmldir=`pwd`/public/latest/ build install

I discovered this by examining the console output of one of the
successful runs. The failed build you saw doesn't provide any useful
diagnostic info that I can see. I suspect it was a transient failure
in the CI system on gitlab.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


More gitlab quirks: What is this trying to tell me?

2018-02-27 Thread Hal Murray via devel

Again, it's the second of a pair of messages.  The first one said it 
succeeded.

Subject: ntpsec | Pipeline #18114131 has failed for master | 8c34d988
...

Pipeline #18114131 ( https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/pipelines/18114131 ) 
triggered by Hal Murray ( https://gitlab.com/hal.murray )
had 1 failed build.

Job #54679446

Stage: deploy
Name: pages:deploy

--

What does "pages:deploy" do?  On the diagram of all the steps, it's the lower 
of the pair on the right.

A fresh clone looks good.  It builds OK, and a diff with my working copy 
shows only git stuff.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

2018-02-27 Thread Sanjeev Gupta via devel
Apologies.

I checked an hour ago, and the guy who assured me that we were using
'native' SNMP has come back saying he setup the cacti script that talks
over ntpq

I have posted a bounty offer on the cacti forum.

Apologies for raising hopes.

On 27 Feb 2018 7:40 pm, "Jason Azze via devel"  wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Richard Laager via devel
>  wrote:
> > On 02/26/2018 06:16 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> >> Richard, I am using cacti.
> >
> > That's what I was hoping to hear, since I also run Cacti. Are you
> > willing to share your templates?
>
> I'm also a Cacti user, though it has been years since I logged on to
> the Cacti forums to search for a template. If you have one that works,
> Sanjeev, I'd also like to get in on the action.
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

2018-02-27 Thread Jason Azze via devel
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Richard Laager via devel
 wrote:
> On 02/26/2018 06:16 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>> Richard, I am using cacti.
>
> That's what I was hoping to hear, since I also run Cacti. Are you
> willing to share your templates?

I'm also a Cacti user, though it has been years since I logged on to
the Cacti forums to search for a template. If you have one that works,
Sanjeev, I'd also like to get in on the action.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

2018-02-27 Thread Sanjeev Gupta via devel
> Related to point 2; do you have rough numbers of how long / many
instances of this have been running?

A few weeks now on at least one.  You may recall I had a bug report about
IPv6 addresses.



-- 
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Ian Bruene via devel 
wrote:

>
>
> On 02/26/2018 06:13 PM, Sanjeev Gupta via devel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For what it is worth, I am running the ntpsnmpd code on a number of debian
> and ubuntu machines for some time, including one with an actual GPS.  No
> issues so far.
>
> I just like to see graphs.
>
>
> Hooray! Someone is using the code!
>
> 1. This means it is useful.
>
> 2. This gives some confirmation of stability.
>
> Related to point 2; do you have rough numbers of how long / many instances
> of this have been running?
>
> --
> *"In the end; what separates a Man, from a Slave? Money? Power? No. A Man
> Chooses, a Slave Obeys."* -- Andrew Ryan
>
> *"Utopia cannot precede the Utopian. It will exist the moment we are fit
> to occupy it."* -- Sophia Lamb
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel