Re: [ovirt-devel] FC27 updates broken for ovirt-4.2

2018-02-27 Thread Nir Soffer 
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM Viktor Mihajlovski <
mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 27.02.2018 13:35, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 בפבר׳ 2018, 13:25, מאת Dan Horák ‏:
> >
> >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:13:15 +0100
> >> Viktor Mihajlovski  wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 27.02.2018 01:26, Nir Soffer wrote:
>  בתאריך יום ב׳, 26 בפבר׳ 2018, 22:10, מאת Yaniv Kaul
>   ‏:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski <
> > mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I just tried to update the ovirt packages on my FC27 host, but
> >> failed due to https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87628/
> >>
> >> vdsm now requires libvirt >= 3.10.0-132 but Fedora 27 has only
> >> 3.7.0-4 the moment.
> >>
> >> It's generic Fedora 27, but since I run on s390, cross-posting to
> >> s390 list.
> >>
> >> I guess there's good reason to require libvirt 3.10. Is there any
> >> chance that we can get libvirt updated for Fedora 27?
> >>
> >
> > Perhaps use the virt-preview[1] repo for now?
> >
> 
>  Yes, we require virt-preview for Fedora. This is why that patch did
>  not fail in the CI.
> >>> Makes sense, unfortunately virt-preview doesn't contains s390 binaries
> >>> at this point in time. Would be great if at least libvirt and qemu
> >>> could be built for s390.
> >>
> >> looks like it's even x86_64 only, /me wonders what it would require to
> >> offer other arches (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x) as well
> >>
> >
> > If we need to support platform not supported in virt-preview, we need to
> > chage the requirement so it is used only on x86_64.
> >
> > Victor, would you like to send a patch?
> I believe there was a good reason to bump the libvirt requirement in the
> vdsm package (some bugfix).


There was a very good reason to require this fix.


> Ideally, virt-preview should be build for
> s390 as well.
>

This is the right thing to do for long term.

But Looking at the related bug, it seems that the fix is available
in libvirt-3.7.0-4.fc27, and there is no need to require 3.10.

Waiting for confirmation from libvirt folks about this.


> If I'm not mistaking, the script
> https://github.com/crobinso/build-fedora-virt-preview is used to build
> the RPMs and populate the repository.
>
> Dan, Cole: what would it take to run this on the fedora-390 build machine?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>> [...]
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>>  Viktor Mihajlovski
> >>> ___
> >>> s390x mailing list -- s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to s390x-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>  Viktor Mihajlovski
>
>
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] FC27 updates broken for ovirt-4.2

2018-02-27 Thread Dan Horák 
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:54:06 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski  wrote:

> On 27.02.2018 13:35, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 בפבר׳ 2018, 13:25, מאת Dan Horák ‏:
> > 
> >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:13:15 +0100
> >> Viktor Mihajlovski  wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 27.02.2018 01:26, Nir Soffer wrote:
>  בתאריך יום ב׳, 26 בפבר׳ 2018, 22:10, מאת Yaniv Kaul
>   ‏:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski <
> > mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I just tried to update the ovirt packages on my FC27 host, but
> >> failed due to https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87628/
> >>
> >> vdsm now requires libvirt >= 3.10.0-132 but Fedora 27 has only
> >> 3.7.0-4 the moment.
> >>
> >> It's generic Fedora 27, but since I run on s390, cross-posting
> >> to s390 list.
> >>
> >> I guess there's good reason to require libvirt 3.10. Is there
> >> any chance that we can get libvirt updated for Fedora 27?
> >>
> >
> > Perhaps use the virt-preview[1] repo for now?
> >
> 
>  Yes, we require virt-preview for Fedora. This is why that patch
>  did not fail in the CI.
> >>> Makes sense, unfortunately virt-preview doesn't contains s390
> >>> binaries at this point in time. Would be great if at least
> >>> libvirt and qemu could be built for s390.
> >>
> >> looks like it's even x86_64 only, /me wonders what it would
> >> require to offer other arches (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x) as well
> >>
> > 
> > If we need to support platform not supported in virt-preview, we
> > need to chage the requirement so it is used only on x86_64.
> > 
> > Victor, would you like to send a patch?
> I believe there was a good reason to bump the libvirt requirement in
> the vdsm package (some bugfix). Ideally, virt-preview should be build
> for s390 as well.
> If I'm not mistaking, the script
> https://github.com/crobinso/build-fedora-virt-preview is used to build
> the RPMs and populate the repository.
> 
> Dan, Cole: what would it take to run this on the fedora-390 build
> machine?

after a brief look the script needs to be made multi-arch-aware (it
hard-codes x86_64 in some places), when it calls mock, and then it
needs some HW (we have ppc64le and s390x even now, aarch64 might take
a while), overall it looks doable to me. Cole, what do you think?


Dan
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] FC27 updates broken for ovirt-4.2

2018-02-27 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski 
On 27.02.2018 13:35, Nir Soffer wrote:
> בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 בפבר׳ 2018, 13:25, מאת Dan Horák ‏:
> 
>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:13:15 +0100
>> Viktor Mihajlovski  wrote:
>>
>>> On 27.02.2018 01:26, Nir Soffer wrote:
 בתאריך יום ב׳, 26 בפבר׳ 2018, 22:10, מאת Yaniv Kaul
  ‏:

> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski <
> mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> I just tried to update the ovirt packages on my FC27 host, but
>> failed due to https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87628/
>>
>> vdsm now requires libvirt >= 3.10.0-132 but Fedora 27 has only
>> 3.7.0-4 the moment.
>>
>> It's generic Fedora 27, but since I run on s390, cross-posting to
>> s390 list.
>>
>> I guess there's good reason to require libvirt 3.10. Is there any
>> chance that we can get libvirt updated for Fedora 27?
>>
>
> Perhaps use the virt-preview[1] repo for now?
>

 Yes, we require virt-preview for Fedora. This is why that patch did
 not fail in the CI.
>>> Makes sense, unfortunately virt-preview doesn't contains s390 binaries
>>> at this point in time. Would be great if at least libvirt and qemu
>>> could be built for s390.
>>
>> looks like it's even x86_64 only, /me wonders what it would require to
>> offer other arches (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x) as well
>>
> 
> If we need to support platform not supported in virt-preview, we need to
> chage the requirement so it is used only on x86_64.
> 
> Victor, would you like to send a patch?
I believe there was a good reason to bump the libvirt requirement in the
vdsm package (some bugfix). Ideally, virt-preview should be build for
s390 as well.
If I'm not mistaking, the script
https://github.com/crobinso/build-fedora-virt-preview is used to build
the RPMs and populate the repository.

Dan, Cole: what would it take to run this on the fedora-390 build machine?
> 
> 
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> [...]
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>  Viktor Mihajlovski
>>> ___
>>> s390x mailing list -- s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to s390x-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
> 


-- 
Regards,
 Viktor Mihajlovski

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] FC27 updates broken for ovirt-4.2

2018-02-27 Thread Nir Soffer 
בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 בפבר׳ 2018, 13:25, מאת Dan Horák ‏:

> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:13:15 +0100
> Viktor Mihajlovski  wrote:
>
> > On 27.02.2018 01:26, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > > בתאריך יום ב׳, 26 בפבר׳ 2018, 22:10, מאת Yaniv Kaul
> > >  ‏:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski <
> > >> mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I just tried to update the ovirt packages on my FC27 host, but
> > >>> failed due to https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87628/
> > >>>
> > >>> vdsm now requires libvirt >= 3.10.0-132 but Fedora 27 has only
> > >>> 3.7.0-4 the moment.
> > >>>
> > >>> It's generic Fedora 27, but since I run on s390, cross-posting to
> > >>> s390 list.
> > >>>
> > >>> I guess there's good reason to require libvirt 3.10. Is there any
> > >>> chance that we can get libvirt updated for Fedora 27?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Perhaps use the virt-preview[1] repo for now?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, we require virt-preview for Fedora. This is why that patch did
> > > not fail in the CI.
> > Makes sense, unfortunately virt-preview doesn't contains s390 binaries
> > at this point in time. Would be great if at least libvirt and qemu
> > could be built for s390.
>
> looks like it's even x86_64 only, /me wonders what it would require to
> offer other arches (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x) as well
>

If we need to support platform not supported in virt-preview, we need to
chage the requirement so it is used only on x86_64.

Victor, would you like to send a patch?


>
> Dan
>
> > [...]
> > --
> > Regards,
> >  Viktor Mihajlovski
> > ___
> > s390x mailing list -- s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to s390x-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] FC27 updates broken for ovirt-4.2

2018-02-27 Thread Dan Horák 
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:13:15 +0100
Viktor Mihajlovski  wrote:

> On 27.02.2018 01:26, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > בתאריך יום ב׳, 26 בפבר׳ 2018, 22:10, מאת Yaniv Kaul
> >  ‏:
> > 
> >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski <
> >> mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just tried to update the ovirt packages on my FC27 host, but
> >>> failed due to https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87628/
> >>>
> >>> vdsm now requires libvirt >= 3.10.0-132 but Fedora 27 has only
> >>> 3.7.0-4 the moment.
> >>>
> >>> It's generic Fedora 27, but since I run on s390, cross-posting to
> >>> s390 list.
> >>>
> >>> I guess there's good reason to require libvirt 3.10. Is there any
> >>> chance that we can get libvirt updated for Fedora 27?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Perhaps use the virt-preview[1] repo for now?
> >>
> > 
> > Yes, we require virt-preview for Fedora. This is why that patch did
> > not fail in the CI.
> Makes sense, unfortunately virt-preview doesn't contains s390 binaries
> at this point in time. Would be great if at least libvirt and qemu
> could be built for s390.

looks like it's even x86_64 only, /me wonders what it would require to
offer other arches (aarch64, ppc64le, s390x) as well


Dan

> [...]
> -- 
> Regards,
>  Viktor Mihajlovski
> ___
> s390x mailing list -- s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to s390x-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] FC27 updates broken for ovirt-4.2

2018-02-27 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski 
On 27.02.2018 01:26, Nir Soffer wrote:
> בתאריך יום ב׳, 26 בפבר׳ 2018, 22:10, מאת Yaniv Kaul ‏:
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski <
>> mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just tried to update the ovirt packages on my FC27 host, but failed
>>> due to https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87628/
>>>
>>> vdsm now requires libvirt >= 3.10.0-132 but Fedora 27 has only 3.7.0-4
>>> the moment.
>>>
>>> It's generic Fedora 27, but since I run on s390, cross-posting to s390
>>> list.
>>>
>>> I guess there's good reason to require libvirt 3.10. Is there any chance
>>> that we can get libvirt updated for Fedora 27?
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps use the virt-preview[1] repo for now?
>>
> 
> Yes, we require virt-preview for Fedora. This is why that patch did not
> fail in the CI.
Makes sense, unfortunately virt-preview doesn't contains s390 binaries
at this point in time. Would be great if at least libvirt and qemu could
be built for s390.
[...]
-- 
Regards,
 Viktor Mihajlovski

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel