Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

2018-03-07 Thread Sebastian Huber 



On 09/02/18 13:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:

On 09/02/18 08:58, Sebastian Huber wrote:

On 08/02/18 16:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
sp19 and tm26 are not in that list. What about them? 


They should be fixed now.



The sp19 fails now on SPARC:

*** BEGIN OF TEST SP 19 ***
*** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.dc8fd0152928649ac83632a712d96c0dbeca05ae
*** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS
*** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_NETWORKING RTEMS_POSIX_API RTEMS_SMP
*** TEST TOOLS: 7.3.0 20180125 (RTEMS 5, RSB 
703532cb04c6990fb21e97cb7347a16e9df11108, Newlib 3.0.0)

FP1  - integer base = (0x6000)
FP1  - float base = (NA)
FP1  - integer base = (0x6000)
FP1  - float base = (NA)
TA1  - integer base = (0x1000)
TA1  - rtems_clock_get_tod - 09:00:00   12/31/1988

  CPU 0:  breakpoint 1 hit
  0x4000bc98: 94102000  mov  0, %o2  <_Terminate+4>
  CPU 1:  Power down mode
  CPU 2:  Power down mode
  CPU 3:  Power down mode

grmon2> bt

   %pc  %sp
  #0   0x4000bc98   0x40025b68   <_Terminate+0x4>
  #1   0x4000bce8   0x40025bd0   <_Internal_error+0x8>
  #2   0x40005cf8   0x40025c30   
  #3   0x4001f848   0x40025c98
  #4   0x400172d8   0x40031ba0   <_vfprintf_r+0x2e8>
  #5   0x400198d8   0x40031e28   <__sbprintf+0x70>
  #6   0x40017280   0x40032308   <_vfprintf_r+0x290>
  #7   0x40014880   0x400324e0   
  #8   0x40013e44   0x40032540   
  #9   0x40004688   0x400325a8   
  #10  0x4000f7a0   0x400326b8 <_Thread_Entry_adaptor_numeric+0x8>
  #11  0x4000f870   0x40032718   <_Thread_Handler+0x60>
  #12  0x4000f810   0x40032778   <_Thread_Handler+0>

I don't know how to fix this. The Task_1 is created with/without 
RTEMS_FLOATING_POINT. Changing everything to RTEMS_FLOATING_POINT may 
change the test objectives.




I fixed it like this:

https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=828049cb47d974fcc816a5bd8868fdaf670201a3

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

2018-02-09 Thread Sebastian Huber 

On 09/02/18 08:58, Sebastian Huber wrote:

On 08/02/18 16:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
sp19 and tm26 are not in that list. What about them? 


They should be fixed now.



The sp19 fails now on SPARC:

*** BEGIN OF TEST SP 19 ***
*** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.dc8fd0152928649ac83632a712d96c0dbeca05ae
*** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS
*** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_NETWORKING RTEMS_POSIX_API RTEMS_SMP
*** TEST TOOLS: 7.3.0 20180125 (RTEMS 5, RSB 
703532cb04c6990fb21e97cb7347a16e9df11108, Newlib 3.0.0)

FP1  - integer base = (0x6000)
FP1  - float base = (NA)
FP1  - integer base = (0x6000)
FP1  - float base = (NA)
TA1  - integer base = (0x1000)
TA1  - rtems_clock_get_tod - 09:00:00   12/31/1988

  CPU 0:  breakpoint 1 hit
  0x4000bc98: 94102000  mov  0, %o2  <_Terminate+4>
  CPU 1:  Power down mode
  CPU 2:  Power down mode
  CPU 3:  Power down mode

grmon2> bt

   %pc  %sp
  #0   0x4000bc98   0x40025b68   <_Terminate+0x4>
  #1   0x4000bce8   0x40025bd0   <_Internal_error+0x8>
  #2   0x40005cf8   0x40025c30   
  #3   0x4001f848   0x40025c98
  #4   0x400172d8   0x40031ba0   <_vfprintf_r+0x2e8>
  #5   0x400198d8   0x40031e28   <__sbprintf+0x70>
  #6   0x40017280   0x40032308   <_vfprintf_r+0x290>
  #7   0x40014880   0x400324e0   
  #8   0x40013e44   0x40032540   
  #9   0x40004688   0x400325a8   
  #10  0x4000f7a0   0x400326b8 <_Thread_Entry_adaptor_numeric+0x8>
  #11  0x4000f870   0x40032718   <_Thread_Handler+0x60>
  #12  0x4000f810   0x40032778   <_Thread_Handler+0>

I don't know how to fix this. The Task_1 is created with/without 
RTEMS_FLOATING_POINT. Changing everything to RTEMS_FLOATING_POINT may 
change the test objectives.


--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

2018-02-08 Thread Sebastian Huber 

On 08/02/18 16:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
sp19 and tm26 are not in that list. What about them? 


They should be fixed now.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

2018-02-08 Thread Joel Sherrill 
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> On 08/02/18 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Jennifer noticed that sp19 prints %g instead of numbers now that
>> we switched to printk for the tests.  I did a quick grep and found these:
>>
>> testsuites$ grep -rl "%g" .
>> ./samples/fileio/init.c
>> ./samples/paranoia/paranoia.c
>> ./sptests/sp19/first.c
>> ./sptests/sp19/fptask.c
>> ./sptests/sp19/fptest.h
>> ./tmtests/tm26/fptest.h
>>
>> Are fileio and paranoia using printf()?
>>
>
> They use:
>
> testsuites/samples/pppd/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/samples/loopback/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/samples/paranoia/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/samples/hello/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/samples/capture/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/benchmarks/linpack/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/benchmarks/whetstone/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/benchmarks/dhrystone/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/libtests/mathl/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/libtests/mathf/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/libtests/complex/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/libtests/math/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/smptests/smpmigration01/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/smptests/smpopenmp01/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
> testsuites/sptests/spconsole01/init.c: rtems_print_printer_fprintf_pu
> tc(_test_printer);
>


sp19 and tm26 are not in that list. What about them?


>
>
>> Do we need to eliminate these uses of %g in sptests and tmtests?
>>
>> --joel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
> PGP : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

2018-02-08 Thread Sebastian Huber 

On 08/02/18 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:

Hi

Jennifer noticed that sp19 prints %g instead of numbers now that
we switched to printk for the tests.  I did a quick grep and found these:

testsuites$ grep -rl "%g" .
./samples/fileio/init.c
./samples/paranoia/paranoia.c
./sptests/sp19/first.c
./sptests/sp19/fptask.c
./sptests/sp19/fptest.h
./tmtests/tm26/fptest.h

Are fileio and paranoia using printf()?


They use:

testsuites/samples/pppd/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/samples/loopback/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/samples/paranoia/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/samples/hello/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/samples/capture/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/benchmarks/linpack/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/benchmarks/whetstone/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/benchmarks/dhrystone/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/libtests/mathl/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/libtests/mathf/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/libtests/complex/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/libtests/math/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/smptests/smpmigration01/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/smptests/smpopenmp01/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);
testsuites/sptests/spconsole01/init.c: 
rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc(_test_printer);




Do we need to eliminate these uses of %g in sptests and tmtests?

--joel







___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel