Re: i810 driver 1400x1050 problem -- bios replacement
S Streif wrote: It might be necessary to modify the video bios with the vbios tool. Because it is written in the driver's info file ( ftp://download.intel.com/design/intarch/SWSUP/IEGDLinux.htm ): Please be sure to download the Video BIOS as well. Any ideas? Just found this: ftp://download.intel.com/design/intarch/swsup/IEGDVBIOS.htm I don't have time time to check it now I will when I will be back in the evening. Probably putted togheter can give some interesting results :) kind regards, -- Jakub Troszok [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nomachine.com ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Cheap software on CDs, Devel.
Unbelievable :)An artist must be a reactionary. He has to stand out against the tenor of the age and not go flopping along. Low rates on Software Looking for not expensive high-quality software? We might be just what you need.http://scandalized.soft-dindon.biz We offer Software to download or it can be shipped to you on CD.Here is some of the software you can get on our site:Adobe Photoshop CS 8.0 - 40$Borland Delphi 8 Architect Edition - 50$ Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Enterprise Edition - 55$ And more!We are able to ship worldwide.Luck is infatuated with the efficient.Ambition is pitiless. Any merit that it cannot use it finds despicable.
Re: i830 screen black after resume on 4.4
Have you tried adding Option VBERestore false Alan. On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:37:34AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: I've checked the CVS, and found that the i810 driver up to 4_3_99_9 works after resume, but anything after 4_3_99_9 has the same problem of displaying black screen after apm resume. Is there anyone else having this problem? I'm running on IBM X30 ThinkPad. Thanks, Jeff On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Jeff Chua wrote: still doesn't work. But why _old_ version works better than new one? Usually newer version should works better, but in this case, it looks like going one step back ... Thanks, Jeff [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Alex Deucher wrote: --- Jeff Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting black screen after power resume on version 4.4.99.2. I can see the mouse, all window frames, but black contents. No such problem with 4.3.0. Tested on linux 2.4.26-rc2 and 2.6.5 I'm using apm to resume, and with 4.3.0, it works fine. You might try changing the VT prior to suspending if you are not already. Alex Thanks, Jeff [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: i810 driver 1400x1050 problem -- bios replacement
Hi, L. Jensen schrieb: The driver runs on the external monitor by default. It needs Option PrimaryPort LVDS to start on the local lcd. With that option I was able start XFree86 with a resolution of 1024x768 on my LCD. (That's its native resolution.) But the server crashes every time when starting KDE. I wonder if anybody will get the driver working without problems. CU Christian -- Christian Zietz - CHZ-Soft - [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.chzsoft.com.ar/ PGP-Key auf Anfrage oder ueber http://www.keyserver.net/ ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: license statements in CVS commit messages
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:05:06AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: I notice many of the affected files do not bear the license notice mentioned in the checkin notice. Is that intentional? Will everyone investigating the license that applies to a file now have to check every CVS commit log entry for that file as well as the file itself to find out which license applies? Assume that anything attributed to me is covered by the 1.1 licence unless explicitly stated otherwise. You mean anything attributed to you in the existing copyright notice, or in the CHANGELOG file? Everything I do is covered by the 1.1 licence unless I explicitly state otherwise. David ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: license statements in CVS commit messages
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:05:06AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: I notice many of the affected files do not bear the license notice mentioned in the checkin notice. Is that intentional? Will everyone investigating the license that applies to a file now have to check every CVS commit log entry for that file as well as the file itself to find out which license applies? Assume that anything attributed to me is covered by the 1.1 licence unless explicitly stated otherwise. You mean anything attributed to you in the existing copyright notice, or in the CHANGELOG file? Everything I do is covered by the 1.1 licence unless I explicitly state otherwise. For example, I seem to recall your committing changes such as #if defined(SCO325) || defined(SCO) || defined(sco) to #if defined(__SCO__) in response to a Bugzilla report by someone else. Reading your statement above literally, it says that makes any modified code covered by the 1.1 license. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: FW: license statements in CVS commit messages
I wrote the original question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] several days ago, ( http://www.mail-archive.com/devel%40xfree86.org/msg05901.html ) her response was the now this was a joke right? line. My response Al was private which is why Tom, and anyone else who looked, could not find it. Attributing source correctly seems to be a real problem with you it seems. I guess it's endemic. Georgina ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: i830 screen black after resume on 4.4
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Have you tried adding
Option VBERestore false
Tried, but still doesn't work.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Alex Deucher wrote:
Can you narrow down the exact change that caused the problem?
I looked into why 4_3_99_9 works, and anything after doesn't, and realized
that this portion of the code causes the problem.
--- i830_driver.c.org Mon Apr 12 22:25:53 2004
+++ i830_driver.c Mon Apr 12 22:29:29 2004
@@ -2147,6 +2147,14 @@
vbeFree(pVbe);
#if defined(XF86DRI)
+ /* Load the dri module if requested. */
+ if (xf86ReturnOptValBool(pI830-Options, OPTION_DRI, FALSE)
+ !pI830-directRenderingDisabled) {
+ if (xf86LoadSubModule(pScrn, dri)) {
+xf86LoaderReqSymLists(I810driSymbols, I810drmSymbols, NULL);
+ }
+ }
+
if (!pI830-directRenderingDisabled) {
if (!xf86LoadSubModule(pScrn, shadow)) {
PreInitCleanup(pScrn);
It seems that loading the DRI causes the screen to go blank after resume.
If I don't suspend/resume, screen works fine.
Next, I tried disabling DRI ...
Option DRI off
and that fixes the problem. Screen restores correctly after resume.
I don't know how to fix the DRI to get it to restore the screen after
resume, but if someone is willing to provide guidance, I'll be more than
willing to help.
Thanks,
Jeff.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: i830 screen black after resume on 4.4
--- Jeff Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Have you tried adding
Option VBERestore false
Tried, but still doesn't work.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Alex Deucher wrote:
Can you narrow down the exact change that caused the problem?
I looked into why 4_3_99_9 works, and anything after doesn't, and
realized
that this portion of the code causes the problem.
--- i830_driver.c.org Mon Apr 12 22:25:53 2004
+++ i830_driver.c Mon Apr 12 22:29:29 2004
@@ -2147,6 +2147,14 @@
vbeFree(pVbe);
#if defined(XF86DRI)
+ /* Load the dri module if requested. */
+ if (xf86ReturnOptValBool(pI830-Options, OPTION_DRI, FALSE)
+ !pI830-directRenderingDisabled) {
+ if (xf86LoadSubModule(pScrn, dri)) {
+xf86LoaderReqSymLists(I810driSymbols, I810drmSymbols, NULL);
+ }
+ }
+
if (!pI830-directRenderingDisabled) {
if (!xf86LoadSubModule(pScrn, shadow)) {
PreInitCleanup(pScrn);
It seems that loading the DRI causes the screen to go blank after
resume.
If I don't suspend/resume, screen works fine.
Next, I tried disabling DRI ...
Option DRI off
and that fixes the problem. Screen restores correctly after resume.
I don't know how to fix the DRI to get it to restore the screen after
resume, but if someone is willing to provide guidance, I'll be more
than
willing to help.
Unfortunately, there is no real dri support for suspend/resume. The
only driver with support is the radeon driver. you also need to have
suspend/resume support in the agp chipset driver. See this apge for
more info:
http://cpbotha.net/dri_resume.html
Feel free to implement support.
Alex
Thanks,
Jeff.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
