Does Intel 865G graphics card support gamma correction
Hi all, In my system ie Intel PC with i865G integrated graphics card, i am not able to do gamma correction. My Linux is SuSE 9.2. Is it that Intel cards does have XFree86 driver support to change gamma values. How can i do gamma correction in my system. Is it possible in Intel systems or not? Regards Karthik R ___ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: DBE on nv, Shape and XAA questions
Mark Vojkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Michal [iso-8859-2] Maru¹ka wrote: > >> * Is it correct, that the "nv" driver does not support DBE (double buffer >> extension)? > >The drivers have nothing to do with DBE extension support. XFree86 > supports DBE for all hardware whenever you load the "extmod" module. > DBE is not supported in Xinerama, however. Thank you for the solution. It was the Option "Xinerama" "true", even if I had no configuration for the xinerama layout. Strange that with mga driver DBE works even with xinerama. Some manpage (the nv?) should mention this incompatibility. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
libXinerama
Dear Mark, I'm sorry for sending this email, but I've read in http://www.mail-archive.com/devel@xfree86.org/msg07158.html, there was discuss about Metacity window, and Manikandan T ask about libXinerama.so.1, and you said that you can provide libXinerama.so.1, below was your posting. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Vojkovich Sent: 07 April 2005 22:56 To: devel@XFree86.Org Subject: Re: missing libXinerama.so.1 It's unfortunate that Metacity has that dependency. The .so comes with newer X-servers. You can try to pull one out of newer X-server packages. I can mail you the library alone if want. Mark. Is it ok if I ask you to send me libXinerama.so.1 too ? Thanks in Advance, Aji -- Wahai Raja Iblis Datanglah disini ada Linux (asumsikan disini ada gambar bintang lima terbalik dalam sebuah lingkaran) Datang ngga dijemput, pulang ngga diantar (Khan besar mo ko bedeng) -- -- ___ Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox. Powered by Outblaze ___ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: SO_KEEPALIVE - a solution for where X servers are shut down?
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Nick Hill wrote: > The problem: > When running X programs to a remote X server, if the remote X server > stops being available, the programs which were being displayed often > stay running. This results in many stale programs running and using > resources. > > It appears that by default, xlibs opens TCP sockets to remote X servers > without setting SO_KEEPALIVE. ... > If this would work, can anyone consider a reason not to enable SO_KEEPALIVE? I guess it was set this way so that idle clients don't die randomly just because the network is busy. Say you are logged on when you go home for the night (I hate it when users do that) with important files open in emacs. For a few minutes during the night the backups saturate the network and emacs dies. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: SO_KEEPALIVE - a solution for where X servers are shut down?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:52:25PM +0100, Nick Hill wrote: > If the TCP socket is closed by the kernel, will X apps also close, > thereby freeing redundant resources? Yes. > If this would work, can anyone consider a reason not to enable SO_KEEPALIVE? It might cause problems which e.g. use a notebook as X11 server and suspend it. Without such a change the X11 clients will survive, with the change they'll be killed. The best solution is probably to make that optional. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/ ___ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: DBE on nv, Shape and XAA questions
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Michal [iso-8859-2] Maru?ka wrote: > * Is it correct, that the "nv" driver does not support DBE (double buffer > extension)? The drivers have nothing to do with DBE extension support. XFree86 supports DBE for all hardware whenever you load the "extmod" module. DBE is not supported in Xinerama, however. > > > * How fast are "Screen to screen bit blits" ? Depends on the hardware. Hardware blits are always significantly faster than software blits. > > I tuned sawfish WM, so that when resizing windows it sets the border window > (WM > decoration) to a suitable window gravity, so it's up to the X server to move > it > correctly (WM does not redraw). I avoided shaped windows. > > I use the "mga" driver, so it has "Screen to screen bit blits" XXA call. > > Yet, if I resize (in 1 direction) continuously the window, i see the vertical > line as a staircase line: > > >|| > b || > l | | > a | ->| > c | | > k | | >| | > > Any idea if it can be improved? Rendering is not synchronized with the screen retrace, so tearing is expected. > > * Shape vs. flickering > > if i run xlogo -shape (resize it to make things clear) and move the logo > window, i see > flickering (the window below is obscured and redrawn even outside of the > logo). We you move a window, the uncovered area needs to be redrawn, of course. When using the shape extension, exposures are not done down to the pixel. For performance reasons, it's exposing bounding boxes, because every separate exposed rectangle is a additional call back to the client. > > I would likt to know, if "Screen to Screen color expansion" XAA call could be > used to > avoid it. > Everything is already fully accelerated. Add Option "NoAccel" to your Section "Device" in the XF86Config file to see what unaccelerated rendering looks like. Mark. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
