Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-25 Thread Egbert Eich
Craig Ringer writes:
 > On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 22:55, Alan Hourihane wrote:
 > > We could leave the option in, but enable it by default, so that this
 > > information is displayed, and allow people to turn it off if it hangs.
 > 
 > Additionally, why not print a log line like
 > 
 > "Some versions of this video BIOS have a bug that will cause XFree86 to
 > hang. If you encounter this, try setting the BLAH option in your config
 > file."
 > 
 > It should save a bunch of questions on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes, this sounds like a good idea. It should be printed right before 
the offending call so people will see it. The system does not hang
hard therefore people should be able to retreive their log. On
the other hand they may not know how to do it in this case.

Sill, such a message may be worthwhile. I will add it together with
the changes Alan suggested.


Egbert.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-24 Thread Craig Ringer
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 22:55, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> We could leave the option in, but enable it by default, so that this
> information is displayed, and allow people to turn it off if it hangs.

Additionally, why not print a log line like

"Some versions of this video BIOS have a bug that will cause XFree86 to
hang. If you encounter this, try setting the BLAH option in your config
file."

It should save a bunch of questions on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Craig Ringer

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-24 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:37:27PM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Christian,
> 
> thank you for the investigation. It proves that we are not to blame.
> It remains to see what should be done about it. Disabling the offending
> function by default for all future doesn't seem to be a good idea as
> the information retreived thru this function may be helpful when people
> send in their logs with their bug reports.
> I'd therefore suggest to enable it and provide information on the
> web and in the man page how the hang can be avoided if somebody 
> encounters it.

Egbert,

We could leave the option in, but enable it by default, so that this
information is displayed, and allow people to turn it off if it hangs.

That might be better.

Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-24 Thread Egbert Eich
Christian,

thank you for the investigation. It proves that we are not to blame.
It remains to see what should be done about it. Disabling the offending
function by default for all future doesn't seem to be a good idea as
the information retreived thru this function may be helpful when people
send in their logs with their bug reports.
I'd therefore suggest to enable it and provide information on the
web and in the man page how the hang can be avoided if somebody 
encounters it.

Egbert.


Christian Zietz writes:
 > 
 > I made some research with a little tool of mine which allows me to load
 > and use another BIOS than the pre-installed one. (This tool is NOT going
 > to be released.)
 > The BIOS dump I got from an Inspiron 510m crashes under DOS, too. This
 > crash only occurs for CX (device number) 0x01. It's not an endless loop
 > but a jump to "nowhere". Let me explain: Depending on the device number
 > the address of the function to call is taken from a table. This fails
 > for device 1 and isn't properly caught so a jump to the middle of some
 > other (totally unrelated) function is executed. That obviously leads to
 > the crash.
 > BIOS build 3197 (which can be obtained from the Intel web site) doesn't
 > have that bug. Since the table with the addresses is in the (partially)
 > user configurable BIOS data block, the missing table entry could also be
 > a configuration error made by Dell. But as Dell's policy towards Linux
 > is "we don't support it", chances are low to get a new BIOS asking there.
 > 
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-24 Thread Egbert Eich
Christian Zietz writes:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > I wrote:
 > 
 > > an interesting thing to know is whether there are i855GM notebooks by
 > > other companies using the same BIOS build (3066) and if these show the
 > > same problem.
 > 
 > Googling the net I found these release notes by Intel
 > (http://www.levi.cz/pub/support/driver/vga/intel/i830_845_852_855_865/pv13.5/relnotes_135.htm)
 > saying "Video BIOS Ver.3066 causes the system to hang". This isn't very
 > detailed but maybe if refers to the bug we're talking about.
 > 

Ah, that explains things. Thanks.
So if Intel is aware of the problem it is for Dell to provide an updated
BIOS.

Egbert.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi,

I wrote:

> an interesting thing to know is whether there are i855GM notebooks by
> other companies using the same BIOS build (3066) and if these show the
> same problem.

Googling the net I found these release notes by Intel
(http://www.levi.cz/pub/support/driver/vga/intel/i830_845_852_855_865/pv13.5/relnotes_135.htm)
saying "Video BIOS Ver.3066 causes the system to hang". This isn't very
detailed but maybe if refers to the bug we're talking about.

CU Christian
-- 
Christian Zietz  -  CHZ-Soft  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://chzsoft.com.ar/ - Fido: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2437/74.9
PGP-Key auf Anfrage oder ueber http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net (Port 11371)


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Christian Zietz
Hallo,

an interesting thing to know is whether there are i855GM notebooks by
other companies using the same BIOS build (3066) and if these show the
same problem.

CU Christian
-- 
Christian Zietz  -  CHZ-Soft  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://chzsoft.com.ar/ - Fido: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2437/74.9
PGP-Key auf Anfrage oder ueber http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net (Port 11371)


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:29:32PM +0100, Christian Zietz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Alan Hourihane schrieb:
> 
> > Is there a string 'DELL' or similar in the BIOS that we can use the
> > function xf86ReadBIOS() to detect this buggy BIOS and skip using this
> > function call in this case ?
> 
> No, there is no reference to Dell in the BIOS. I'm not even sure if they
> configure the BIOS. I just know that there is the possibility to do so
> and that the faulty table is in an area where some values can be
> configured by the OEM. So it doesn't need to be a bug introduced by
> Dell, it's just one possible explanation.
 
No, but currently we've only had reports of people with a Dell BIOS
complain of problems.

> But I suppose that all computers made by Dell affected by this bug use
> BIOS build 3066. So you could scan for "3066Intel(r)", although I don't
> think this would be a good idea. Dell could release a BIOS update or
> other computers from other companies with a different build number could
> be affected, too.

Right, so a combination of the build number and something else would
nail it down furthur.

> So, why not continue to use a configuration option? I don't see any
> problems caused by not calling this particular function.

I don't mind leaving the option in, but it's nice to be able to print
out the detected monitor information for those BIOS' that actually work.

Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi,

Alan Hourihane schrieb:

> Is there a string 'DELL' or similar in the BIOS that we can use the
> function xf86ReadBIOS() to detect this buggy BIOS and skip using this
> function call in this case ?

No, there is no reference to Dell in the BIOS. I'm not even sure if they
configure the BIOS. I just know that there is the possibility to do so
and that the faulty table is in an area where some values can be
configured by the OEM. So it doesn't need to be a bug introduced by
Dell, it's just one possible explanation.

But I suppose that all computers made by Dell affected by this bug use
BIOS build 3066. So you could scan for "3066Intel(r)", although I don't
think this would be a good idea. Dell could release a BIOS update or
other computers from other companies with a different build number could
be affected, too.
So, why not continue to use a configuration option? I don't see any
problems caused by not calling this particular function.

CU Christian

PS: Some video BIOS developer must be a fan of Star Wars. A string I
found in all BIOS versions I had a look at was "Use the force Luke". ;-)
-- 
Christian Zietz  -  CHZ-Soft  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://chzsoft.com.ar/ - Fido: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2437/74.9
PGP-Key auf Anfrage oder ueber http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net (Port 11371)



___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Christian Zietz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Egbert Eich schrieb:
> 
> > I think it would be worthwhile to investigate the origin or the problem
> > and report it to Intel to fix it in the BIOS - in case they have broken
> > something. It looks like an endless loop to me.
> 
> I made some research with a little tool of mine which allows me to load
> and use another BIOS than the pre-installed one. (This tool is NOT going
> to be released.)
> The BIOS dump I got from an Inspiron 510m crashes under DOS, too. This
> crash only occurs for CX (device number) 0x01. It's not an endless loop
> but a jump to "nowhere". Let me explain: Depending on the device number
> the address of the function to call is taken from a table. This fails
> for device 1 and isn't properly caught so a jump to the middle of some
> other (totally unrelated) function is executed. That obviously leads to
> the crash.
> BIOS build 3197 (which can be obtained from the Intel web site) doesn't
> have that bug. Since the table with the addresses is in the (partially)
> user configurable BIOS data block, the missing table entry could also be
> a configuration error made by Dell. But as Dell's policy towards Linux
> is "we don't support it", chances are low to get a new BIOS asking there.

Christian,

Is there a string 'DELL' or similar in the BIOS that we can use the
function xf86ReadBIOS() to detect this buggy BIOS and skip using this
function call in this case ?

Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi,

I just forgot to say, that BIOS build 3197 is newer than the one
installed on the new Dell machines (build 3066). So if it was an error
by Intel they already fixed it.

CU Christian


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi,

Egbert Eich schrieb:

> I think it would be worthwhile to investigate the origin or the problem
> and report it to Intel to fix it in the BIOS - in case they have broken
> something. It looks like an endless loop to me.

I made some research with a little tool of mine which allows me to load
and use another BIOS than the pre-installed one. (This tool is NOT going
to be released.)
The BIOS dump I got from an Inspiron 510m crashes under DOS, too. This
crash only occurs for CX (device number) 0x01. It's not an endless loop
but a jump to "nowhere". Let me explain: Depending on the device number
the address of the function to call is taken from a table. This fails
for device 1 and isn't properly caught so a jump to the middle of some
other (totally unrelated) function is executed. That obviously leads to
the crash.
BIOS build 3197 (which can be obtained from the Intel web site) doesn't
have that bug. Since the table with the addresses is in the (partially)
user configurable BIOS data block, the missing table entry could also be
a configuration error made by Dell. But as Dell's policy towards Linux
is "we don't support it", chances are low to get a new BIOS asking there.

CU Christian
-- 
Christian Zietz  -  CHZ-Soft  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://chzsoft.com.ar/ - Fido: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2437/74.9
PGP-Key auf Anfrage oder ueber http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net (Port 11371)


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-23 Thread Egbert Eich
Christian Zietz writes:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > as I already pointed out some of the users affected by the problem don't
 > want to or aren't able to build XFree86 out of the CVS sources.
 > So I wrote a small hack which wraps around int 0x10 and prevents the
 > function in question (ax=0x5f64, bx=0x0300) from being called. I'm aware
 > that that's a much dirtier solution to the problem than the patched
 > driver but nonetheless I think it might be useful for people who want to
 > use the precompiled XFree86 that came with their distribution.
 > 
 > Download URL for 855wrap: http://www.chzsoft.com.ar/855wrap.tar.gz
 > 

I think it would be worthwhile to investigate the origin or the problem
and report it to Intel to fix it in the BIOS - in case they have broken
something. It looks like an endless loop to me. 
Since the problem appears both to happen inside the emulator and 
vm86 mode it points to the BIOS however we cannot say for sure.
One may want to try to set up registers and execute this command
from 'debug' inside DOS to see if this ends up in an endless loop
also. 

Egbert.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-20 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi,

as I already pointed out some of the users affected by the problem don't
want to or aren't able to build XFree86 out of the CVS sources.
So I wrote a small hack which wraps around int 0x10 and prevents the
function in question (ax=0x5f64, bx=0x0300) from being called. I'm aware
that that's a much dirtier solution to the problem than the patched
driver but nonetheless I think it might be useful for people who want to
use the precompiled XFree86 that came with their distribution.

Download URL for 855wrap: http://www.chzsoft.com.ar/855wrap.tar.gz

CU Christian
-- 
Christian Zietz  -  CHZ-Soft  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://chzsoft.com.ar/ - Fido: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2437/74.9
PGP-Key auf Anfrage oder ueber http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net (Port 11371)


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver - solved

2004-02-20 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi,

Thank you Alain for sorting out this problem and Alan for commiting a patch.
Would it be possible to offer binaries or a small, easy to build source
package? I think many of the users affected by that problem can't build
or don't want to build the whole XFree86 from source.

CU Christian


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver - solved

2004-02-20 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:33:41PM +0100, Alain Poirier wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 Février 2004 01:33, Alan Hourihane a écrit :
> > Alain,
> >
> > Can you try the int10 emulator ?
> >
> > To do this, (re)move this file out of the way.
> >
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a
> >
> > Then XFree86 will use
> >
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libint10.a
> >
> > Which is the emulator. Does it still lockup with that BIOS call ?
> 
> I tried and got the exact same lockup.

O.k. Thanks. I committed a patch which turns this BIOS call off by
default and it can be turned back on again with the option "DisplayInfo".

Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver - solved

2004-02-20 Thread Alain Poirier
Le vendredi 20 Février 2004 01:33, Alan Hourihane a écrit :
> Alain,
>
> Can you try the int10 emulator ?
>
> To do this, (re)move this file out of the way.
>
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a
>
> Then XFree86 will use
>
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libint10.a
>
> Which is the emulator. Does it still lockup with that BIOS call ?

I tried and got the exact same lockup.

-

Section "Module"
Load"dbe"

SubSection  "extmod"
Option  "omit xfree86-dga"
EndSubSection

Load"type1"
Load"freetype"
Load"glx"
Load"dri"
Load"synaptics"
EndSection

Section "Files"
RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"

#FontPath   "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
#FontPath   "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID"
#FontPath   "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts"
#FontPath   "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/truetype"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF"
FontPath"/usr/local/share/fonts/TTF"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Keyboard"
Driver  "keyboard"

Option  "AutoRepeat""500 30"


Option  "XkbRules"  "xfree86"
Option  "XkbModel"  "pc105"
Option  "XkbLayout" "fr"
#Option "XkbVariant""fr-latin1"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"

Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
#Option "Device""/dev/input/mice
Option  "Device""/dev/misc/psaux"

Option  "Emulate3Buttons"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier  "LCD"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Device"
Driver  "i810"

#VideoRam   32768
VideoRam8192
#Option "hw cursor" "off"
#Option "no_accel"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier  "Screen"
Device  "Device"
Monitor "LCD"

DefaultDepth 24

SubSection "Display"
Depth   24
Modes   "1280x1024"
EndSubsection
EndSection

Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier  "Main Layout"

Screen  "Screen"
InputDevice "Mouse" "CorePointer"
InputDevice "Keyboard" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection

Section "DRI"
Mode0666
EndSection

-

This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way.  Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository
(http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs).

XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1
Release Date: 15 August 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.3-love1 i686 [ELF] 
Build Date: 20 February 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sat Feb 21 12:20:10 2004
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config"
(==) ServerLayout "Main Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen" (0)
(**) |   |-->Monitor "LCD"
(**) |   |-->Device "Device"
(**) |-->Input Device "Mouse"
(**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard"
(**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30"
(**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
(**) XKB: rules: "xfree86"
(**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
(**) XKB: model: "pc105"
(**) Option "XkbLayout" "fr"
(**) XKB: layout: "fr"
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts".
Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts").
(**) FontPath set to 
"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF,/usr/local/share/fonts/TTF"
(**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"
(==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
Using vt 7
(--) using VT number 7

(WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such file or directory)
(II) Module ABI versions:
XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2
XFree86 Video Driver: 0.6
XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4
XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2
XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4
(II) Loader running on linux
(II) LoadModule: "bitmap"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
ABI class: XFree86 Font Render

Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver - solved

2004-02-19 Thread Alan Hourihane
Alain,

Can you try the int10 emulator ?

To do this, (re)move this file out of the way.

/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a

Then XFree86 will use

/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libint10.a

Which is the emulator. Does it still lockup with that BIOS call ?

Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver - solved

2004-02-19 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:17:03PM +0100, Alain POIRIER wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > > Christian Zietz writes:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > as developer of 855patch I get a lot of feedback from people using
> > > XFree86 on computers with i855GM graphics.
> > > It seems like new notebooks by Dell feature a new video BIOS from Intel
> > > (iirc Build 3066) which finally implements the int 0x10 0x5f11 function
> > > to set the amount of video RAM and thus making 855patch obsolete.
> > > 
> > > But the i810-driver refuses to work on systems with that BIOS version. I
> > > had several independent reports of users who just get a completely green
> > > screen when starting XFree86. I had a look on a log file and found
> > > nothing unusual. The XFree86 VESA driver however works but just in low
> > > resolutions/color depths as there is no way to allocate more video RAM
> > > there.
> > > 
> > > As I've been absent of this list: Is this already a known issue?
> > > 
> >
> > I haven't heared anyting about this issue yet.
> > The first question that comes to my mind is:
> > What happens if a low resolution mode that works with VESA 
> > is set on the i8xx driver?
> >
> > Egbert.
> 
> I've got this problem with the new Dell 510m model : with the normal i810
> driver, we've got only a total green screen.
> 
> The problem comes from the call to INT 10h, 0x5f64 in the 
> GetDisplayInfo() function. It never returns.
> 
> As this function is only informative, I commented out its call in
> I830DetectDisplayDevice() (XFree86 4.3.0.1) :
> 
> ...
> static Bool
> I830DetectDisplayDevice(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn)
> {
>I830Ptr pI830 = I830PTR(pScrn);
>int pipe, n;
>DisplayType i;
> 
> #if 0
>for (i = 0; i < NumKnownDisplayTypes; i++) {
>   if (GetDisplayInfo(pScrn, 1 << i, &pI830->displayAttached[i],
>  &pI830->displayPresent[i],
>  &pI830->displaySize[i].x2,
>  &pI830->displaySize[i].y2)) {
>  xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_INFO,
> "Display Info: %s: attached: %s, present: %s, size: "
> "(%d,%d)\n", displayDevices[i],
> BOOLTOSTRING(pI830->displayAttached[i]),
> BOOLTOSTRING(pI830->displayPresent[i]),
> pI830->displaySize[i].x2, pI830->displaySize[i].y2);
>   }
>}
> #endif
> 
>pI830->configuredDevices = GetDisplayDevices(pScrn);
>if (pI830->configuredDevices == -1) {
>   xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_INFO,
>  "Failed to detect active display devices\n");
>   return FALSE;
>}

Alain,

That's good to know. This call to GetDisplayInfo isn't strictly needed,
but it's useful information to find out about the attached displays.

It's probably wise if we make this an option in the driver and turn
it off by default.

Alan.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver - solved

2004-02-19 Thread Alain POIRIER
Hi,

> > Christian Zietz writes:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > as developer of 855patch I get a lot of feedback from people using
> > XFree86 on computers with i855GM graphics.
> > It seems like new notebooks by Dell feature a new video BIOS from Intel
> > (iirc Build 3066) which finally implements the int 0x10 0x5f11 function
> > to set the amount of video RAM and thus making 855patch obsolete.
> > 
> > But the i810-driver refuses to work on systems with that BIOS version. I
> > had several independent reports of users who just get a completely green
> > screen when starting XFree86. I had a look on a log file and found
> > nothing unusual. The XFree86 VESA driver however works but just in low
> > resolutions/color depths as there is no way to allocate more video RAM
> > there.
> > 
> > As I've been absent of this list: Is this already a known issue?
> > 
>
> I haven't heared anyting about this issue yet.
> The first question that comes to my mind is:
> What happens if a low resolution mode that works with VESA 
> is set on the i8xx driver?
>
> Egbert.

I've got this problem with the new Dell 510m model : with the normal i810
driver, we've got only a total green screen.

The problem comes from the call to INT 10h, 0x5f64 in the 
GetDisplayInfo() function. It never returns.

As this function is only informative, I commented out its call in
I830DetectDisplayDevice() (XFree86 4.3.0.1) :

...
static Bool
I830DetectDisplayDevice(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn)
{
   I830Ptr pI830 = I830PTR(pScrn);
   int pipe, n;
   DisplayType i;

#if 0
   for (i = 0; i < NumKnownDisplayTypes; i++) {
  if (GetDisplayInfo(pScrn, 1 << i, &pI830->displayAttached[i],
 &pI830->displayPresent[i],
 &pI830->displaySize[i].x2,
 &pI830->displaySize[i].y2)) {
 xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_INFO,
"Display Info: %s: attached: %s, present: %s, size: "
"(%d,%d)\n", displayDevices[i],
BOOLTOSTRING(pI830->displayAttached[i]),
BOOLTOSTRING(pI830->displayPresent[i]),
pI830->displaySize[i].x2, pI830->displaySize[i].y2);
  }
   }
#endif

   pI830->configuredDevices = GetDisplayDevices(pScrn);
   if (pI830->configuredDevices == -1) {
  xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_INFO,
 "Failed to detect active display devices\n");
  return FALSE;
   }
...

Now all is working fine (except the fact that the 1500x1040 resolution
is still not reconized by the bios).

I hope this help.

Regards

PS : not more need to use 855Patch with this bios.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver]

2004-02-19 Thread Predrag Miocinovic


 >Christian Zietz writes:
 > > Hi,
 > >
 > > as developer of 855patch I get a lot of feedback from people using
 > > XFree86 on computers with i855GM graphics.
 > > It seems like new notebooks by Dell feature a new video BIOS from Intel
 > > (iirc Build 3066) which finally implements the int 0x10 0x5f11 function
 > > to set the amount of video RAM and thus making 855patch obsolete.
 > >
 > > But the i810-driver refuses to work on systems with that BIOS version. I
 > > had several independent reports of users who just get a completely green
 > > screen when starting XFree86. I had a look on a log file and found
 > > nothing unusual. The XFree86 VESA driver however works but just in low
 > > resolutions/color depths as there is no way to allocate more video RAM
 > > there.
 > >
 > > As I've been absent of this list: Is this already a known issue?
 > >
 >
 >I haven't heared anyting about this issue yet.
 >The first question that comes to my mind is:
 >What happens if a low resolution mode that works with VESA
 >is set on the i8xx driver?
 >
 >Egbert.
Hi,

I have the Dell Latitude D505 in question. It runs latest BIOS (v2) as posted
by Dell on their web site. The video chipset is Intel 82852/855GM. I installed
XFree86 4.4 RC3 with RH 9 kernel 2.4.20-30.9 (although I believe that the same
problem occurs with XF86 4.3, but I didn't investigate in detail before
upgrading). The monitor is XGA, capable of 1024x768 at 60 Hz. The symptoms are
following;
* 892 kB of video memory are reported by BIOS
* vesa driver takes that amount and can run 1024x768x8
* i810 driver negotiates with BIOS for extra memory (the actual amount seems to
depend on video modes specified in XF86Config, anywhere from 8-32 MB)
* i810 driver freezes with green screen and the last line of log is;
"(II) I810(0): 2 display pipes available."
Soft reboot seems like the only way to regain the control of console (ALT-F1,
etc. doesn't work, although keyboard seems responsive)
By changing video modes I tried to "convince" i810 driver not to request extra
video memory, but even for 640x400x8 (4 and 1 bit depth seem not to be
supported by i810) it tries to allocate at least 8 MB.
I'm attaching the logs (successful vesa and frozen i810) and config file (where
I onlt toggle between driver in question).
I hope this helps,
--
~
Predrag Miocinovic


Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "XFree86 Configured"
Screen  0  "Screen0" 0 0
InputDevice"Mouse0" "CorePointer"
InputDevice"Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection

Section "Files"
RgbPath  "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"
ModulePath   "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/"
EndSection

Section "Module"
Load  "extmod"
Load  "dbe"
Load  "dri"
Load  "glx"
Load  "record"
Load  "xtrap"
Load  "speedo"
Load  "type1"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Keyboard0"
Driver  "keyboard"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Mouse0"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "Protocol" "auto"
Option  "Device" "/dev/mouse"
Option  "Emulate3Buttons"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier   "Monitor0"
VendorName   "Dell"
ModelName"Dell Laptop Display 1024x768"
HorizSync31.5-48.5
VertRefresh  59-75

EndSection

Section "Device"
### Available Driver options are:-
### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False",
### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz"
### [arg]: arg optional
#Option "NoAccel"   # []
#Option "SWcursor"  # []
#Option "ColorKey"  # 
#Option "CacheLines"# 
#Option "Dac6Bit"   # []
#Option "DRI"   # []
#Option "NoDDC" # []
#Option "ShowCache" # []
#Option "XvMCSurfaces"  # 
#Option "PageFlip"  # []
Identifier  "Card0"
#Driver  "i810"
Driver  "vesa"
VendorName  "Intel Corp."
BoardName   "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device"
BusID   "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Card0"
Monitor"Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 8
Subsection "Display"
 Depth   8
 #Modes   "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
   

Re: i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-19 Thread Egbert Eich
Christian Zietz writes:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > as developer of 855patch I get a lot of feedback from people using
 > XFree86 on computers with i855GM graphics.
 > It seems like new notebooks by Dell feature a new video BIOS from Intel
 > (iirc Build 3066) which finally implements the int 0x10 0x5f11 function
 > to set the amount of video RAM and thus making 855patch obsolete.
 > 
 > But the i810-driver refuses to work on systems with that BIOS version. I
 > had several independent reports of users who just get a completely green
 > screen when starting XFree86. I had a look on a log file and found
 > nothing unusual. The XFree86 VESA driver however works but just in low
 > resolutions/color depths as there is no way to allocate more video RAM
 > there.
 > 
 > As I've been absent of this list: Is this already a known issue?
 > 

I haven't heared anyting about this issue yet.
The first question that comes to my mind is:
What happens if a low resolution mode that works with VESA 
is set on the i8xx driver?

Egbert.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


i855GM: New BIOS breaks i810-driver

2004-02-18 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi,

as developer of 855patch I get a lot of feedback from people using
XFree86 on computers with i855GM graphics.
It seems like new notebooks by Dell feature a new video BIOS from Intel
(iirc Build 3066) which finally implements the int 0x10 0x5f11 function
to set the amount of video RAM and thus making 855patch obsolete.

But the i810-driver refuses to work on systems with that BIOS version. I
had several independent reports of users who just get a completely green
screen when starting XFree86. I had a look on a log file and found
nothing unusual. The XFree86 VESA driver however works but just in low
resolutions/color depths as there is no way to allocate more video RAM
there.

As I've been absent of this list: Is this already a known issue?

CU Christian


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel