Re: Re: My details

2003-08-19 Thread trivo_progs
I'm on holidays...
when i'll come back i'll answer :))

Sono in vacanza...
rispondero' quando torno :D

Lorenzo

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR URGENT RESPONSE

2003-08-19 Thread Mrs Sheila Whittle.

CYBER LOTTO

INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT,
REF: NBM44125677 AND BATCH NO: 31/107/AY.
ATTENTION: Sir/Madam,
RE/ AWARD NOTIFICATION
We are pleased to inform you of the announcement
today,19st August 2003, of winners of the CYBER LOTTO /INTERNATIONAL
PROGRAMS held on 17TH FEB 2003 as part of our begining of year bonanza.
You or your company, attached to ticket number 1416-4612-750, with serial
number 3187-17 drew the lucky numbers 31-17-8-28-55, and consequently won
the lottery in the A category.
You have therefore been approved for a lump sum pay out of US$
5,500,000.00 in cash credited to file REF NO. REF: NBM44125677.
This is from the total prize money of US$16,500,000.00 shared among the
Three (3) international winners in this category. All participants were
selected through a computer
balloting system drawn form 25,000 names from Middle East, Asia,
Africa,Canada,Europe and North America and Oceania as part our
International Promotions Program, which is conducted annually.

CONGRATULATIONS!
Your fund is now deposited with a security House. Due to the mix up of
some numbers and names, we ask that you keep this award strictly from
public notice until your claim has been processed and your money remitted
to your account.
This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or
unscrupulous acts by participants of this program.
We hope with a part of your prize, you will participate in our end of
year high stakes US$1.1 billion International Lottery.
To begin your claim, please contact your claim agent:
Miss Lynne Goodwin ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For due Verification and remittance of your prize money to a designated
account of your choice.
Remember, you must contact your claim agent not later than 30th of
August, 2003.After this date, all funds will be returned as unclaimed. All
correspondences to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
NOTE: In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complications, please
remember to quote your reference and batch numbers in every one of your
correspondences with your agent. Furthermore,should there be any change of
your address, do inform your claims agent as soon as possible.
Congratulations again from all our staff.
Sincerely,
Mrs Sheila Whittle.
THE PROMOTIONS MANAGER
CYBERLOTTO .
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

N.B.You will be required to pay a token for varification and administrative purpose. 
Please do not reply to this mail. Contact your claim agent.   

Re: Undeliverable message returned to sender

2003-08-19 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, it was written:

Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:22:15 + (UCT)
From: Content Filter 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Undeliverable message returned to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

Delivery failed for the following recipients(s):
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block.
Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious software from
being sent to the recipient in question.

The name(s) of the blocked file(s) follow:
   details.pif

To send this file, please place it in a compressed archive using WinZip 
(http://www.winzip.com) or the archive software of your choice.

- Original Message Header -
Received: by mail1-haw (MessageSwitch) id 1061310135892237_13519; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 
16:22:15 + (UCT)
Received: from COMPCHEM (wkstn233-167.nrb.georgetown.edu [141.161.233.167])
   by mail1-haw.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C74AA4539
   for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:22:14 + (UCT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Approved
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:22:38 --0400
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
   boundary=_NextPart_000_1E2F7733
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


I am on vacation currently, and will not be in the office for a 
while.  If this matter is urgent.  *cough* please try sending it 
again to waste even more bandwidth on the net and slow things 
down even more than the viruses spreading around already.

If we each do our part of adding more layers of autoresponders, 
we can achieve the end goal of making the Internet completely 
useless for communication.


-- 
Mike A. Harris


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: XAA and banked memory

2003-08-19 Thread Mark Vojkovich
  XAA itself doesn't care.  You set the LINEAR_FRAMEBUFFER
in the XaaInfoRec Flags if you have a linear framebuffer.  If
you don't set that flag it won't put pixmaps in offscreen memory
(because the software rendering code won't be able to deal with
them), and it won't use an offscreen pixmap cache for the
same reason unless you provide XAA's ImageWrite, WritePixmap or
WritePixmapToCache replacement functions.

  The most difficult part of banked framebuffers is the software
fallback code.  I'm not sure what the status on the banking layer
is.  Marc La France would know.


Mark.


On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi, i found nothing in the mail archive.  
 Does XAA require the linear memory or it can work  
 with the banked memory (64k @ 0xA) on PC in  
 color depth higher than 8bpp?  
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


2 questions about radeon driver

2003-08-19 Thread Alex Deucher
I have two questions for you about the radeon driver.  

the first relates to the CP and accel.  I'm attempting to convert the
Xv code to use the CP.  how do you check to find out if the driver is
using CP or MMIO accel?  I considered using
info-directRenderingEnabled, but as far as I can see the radeon can
use the CP for accel even if the DRI is disabled.  It's probably
obvious, I'm just missing it.

secondly, is there a way we could switch to software rendering if the
total width or height of or all rendering windows is larger than 2048? 
Since we seem to be hw limited by that, it'd be nice if the driver
would just switch to software after 2048 rather than just showing a
blank window or in some cases locking up the video card.  It might be
too much of a pain in the butt though...

thanks,

Alex

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 2 questions about radeon driver

2003-08-19 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 21:49, Alex Deucher wrote:
 
 I'm attempting to convert the Xv code to use the CP.  how do you check 
 to find out if the driver is using CP or MMIO accel?  I considered 
 using info-directRenderingEnabled, but as far as I can see the 
 radeon can use the CP for accel even if the DRI is disabled.

No, it can't. There's also info-CPStarted which indicates whether the
CP is currently running.


 secondly, is there a way we could switch to software rendering if the
 total width or height of or all rendering windows is larger than 2048? 
 Since we seem to be hw limited by that, it'd be nice if the driver
 would just switch to software after 2048 rather than just showing a
 blank window or in some cases locking up the video card.  It might be
 too much of a pain in the butt though...

(I assume you mean OpenGL software rendering)

I don't think this is possible with the current scheme, we simply need
to disable the DRI if the virtual resolution exceeds 2048 in either
dimension.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dnzer   \  Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast  \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


RE: 2 questions about radeon driver

2003-08-19 Thread Alexander Stohr
CP mode means using an engine on the chip
that gets the command data from main memory
by itselves, some sort of busmaster DMA stream.

MMIO means that the driver does program the
chipset directly via its memory mapped registers.

DRI means direct rendering and is the most common
socket for current OpenGL implementation upon
some kernel module supplied and shared resources.

XAA is the 2D accelleration which can be done 
either in MMIO (helps quite a lot for bring up)
or CP mode - it might make use of some kernel
module supplied resources in CP mode. But there
is no need or requirement that DRI is exposed
in that mode, only the other way round if you
are having DRI then its highly likely to have
the XAA running in CP mode as well. therefore
presence of HW accellerated OpenGL does indicate
that the XAA is as well running in CP mode.

If you need to know hos the XAA is operating
then you should hook into the driver. its not
common to let external applications know or
even assume either state because they are
outside of the 2D display driver.

let me assume you are trying something that
does go byond the concept - either you implement
Xv functionality inside or close to the 2D driver 
or you are asking for heavy trouble.

-Alex.

 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Deucher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 21:50
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: 2 questions about radeon driver
 
 
 I have two questions for you about the radeon driver.  
 
 the first relates to the CP and accel.  I'm attempting to convert the
 Xv code to use the CP.  how do you check to find out if the driver is
 using CP or MMIO accel?  I considered using
 info-directRenderingEnabled, but as far as I can see the radeon can
 use the CP for accel even if the DRI is disabled.  It's probably
 obvious, I'm just missing it.
 
 secondly, is there a way we could switch to software rendering if the
 total width or height of or all rendering windows is larger 
 than 2048? 
 Since we seem to be hw limited by that, it'd be nice if the driver
 would just switch to software after 2048 rather than just showing a
 blank window or in some cases locking up the video card.  It might be
 too much of a pain in the butt though...
 
 thanks,
 
 Alex
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
 http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
 ___
 Devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel