Re: [Development] Building a QtAddon from git
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Christian Gagneraud chg...@gna.orgwrote: On 08/10/2013 01:45 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sexta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2013 21:37:24, Chris Craig wrote: I am not sure what the correct value should be for a playground module that is more or less stagnant should be. Does it need to get bumped with each release like the official modules? Perhaps Sergio, Ossi, or somebody else who does this stuff can chime in. It is the version number of the next release of that addon. Has this addon ever been released before? (I had a look at git log only) No. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Bundling Qt 5 libraries with application package and strange font error
2013/8/10 Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com 2013/8/10 Tomasz Olszak olszak.tom...@gmail.com: It looks like LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't work because even if I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. in /opt/usr/APPID/lib directory and execute ldd on e.g. libQt5Qml.so I get: name=value in a Unix shell does *not* set an environment variable. It sets a shell variable, which won't be seen by external commands run from that shell (like ldd). You need to use either name=value command as a single statement, or export name=value to make it affect all future commands run on the shell session. I am aware of that and used it properly :). In addition, I strongly doubt LD_LIBRARY_PATH supports relative paths. It supports relative to cwd paths. Tomasz Olszak. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2
Tony sayeth: snip, We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms coming in and old ones are just that.old. snip, These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition can be seen here: http://qt-project.org/wiki/CI_Configurations (That web page has been badly out of date, but I'm automating the update process of it currently. I will also keep the Qt argument list up to date so that you can see what the differences are between the configurations.) snip, This is a helpful page -- thanks! QUESTION: I see MSVC2012 start to show up for Win8 (only), and Win7 mostly stays with MSVC2010. Because Microsoft is pushing updates for their MSVC2012 (they are no longer updating MSVC2010, and it misses much C++11), our impression is that MSVC2010 is like Vista, where it's just easier to move-along to the next version. However, we will be Win7 for the foreseeable future (we have no current efforts investigating Win8). Thus, our (Windows) reference platforms are MSVC2008 and MSVC2012 (we have no interest in 2010). Are other people doing this too? Is there interest in moving to MSVC2012 at the expense of MSVC2010? --charley ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] QApplication startup is a lot slower in Qt5 than Qt4
On domingo, 11 de agosto de 2013 02:14:47, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: Did anyone notice that QApplication app(argc, argv) takes on Qt5 about 220ms (warm execution) to execute while on Qt4 only about 50-75ms (warm execution)? Another person confirmed these results on his computer. Can anyone please explain why it happens and if/when it gets fixed? There have been a few fixes post 5.1.0 to fix that. Please make sure you're using 5.1.1 (release branch) or 5.1.2 (stable branch). -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Bundling Qt 5 libraries with application package and strange font error
On sábado, 10 de agosto de 2013 23:53:48, Tomasz Olszak wrote: In addition, I strongly doubt LD_LIBRARY_PATH supports relative paths. It supports relative to cwd paths. And RPATH overrides LD_LIBRARY_PATH. However, the presence of RUNPATH disables RPATH. LD_LIBRARY_PATH overrides RUNPATH. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] QApplication startup is a lot slower in Qt5 than Qt4
Thanks, I compiled and installed from http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.1/5.1.1-rc1/backups/2013-08-10-96/single/ did a reboot and tested again, I didn't notice any difference, I get about 190-220ms on Qt 5.1.1rc1 (while qt4 takes less than 100ms). I wonder if I picked the wrong source files or if the startup time is gonna further improve. On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.comwrote: On domingo, 11 de agosto de 2013 02:14:47, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: Did anyone notice that QApplication app(argc, argv) takes on Qt5 about 220ms (warm execution) to execute while on Qt4 only about 50-75ms (warm execution)? Another person confirmed these results on his computer. Can anyone please explain why it happens and if/when it gets fixed? There have been a few fixes post 5.1.0 to fix that. Please make sure you're using 5.1.1 (release branch) or 5.1.2 (stable branch). -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
