Re: [Development] QVariant comparison in Qt6
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 16:15:47 PDT Bernhard Lindner wrote: > Hi! > > There was a discussion about the decision to deprecate (remove?) QVariant > comparison (<,>) in Qt6 completely. > > Has anything changed for Qt6 (especially regarding comparison of equal > and/or convertible types)? Is the complete deprecation still the latest > decision? Yes, it's changed; no, it's not deprecation. What's been removed is the conversion. Aside from the numeric types, comparing two variants of different types will always result in false. If you want to compare across types, convert one to the other's type or to a common third type. You know what data you put in there and you should know what conversions can be lossy or not. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] QVariant comparison in Qt6
Hi! There was a discussion about the decision to deprecate (remove?) QVariant comparison (<,>) in Qt6 completely. Has anything changed for Qt6 (especially regarding comparison of equal and/or convertible types)? Is the complete deprecation still the latest decision? -- Best Regards, Bernhard Lindner ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver
+1. I did not know Alex is not approver yet. Best regards, Timur. From: Development on behalf of Mårten Nordheim Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 1:57 PM To: Edward Welbourne ; André Hartmann Cc: alex197...@gmail.com ; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver +1 Mårten From: Development on behalf of Edward Welbourne Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 13:43 To: André Hartmann Cc: alex197...@gmail.com; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver On 17 Sep 2020, at 11:37, André Hartmann wrote: >> I like to propose Alex Trotsenko as approver. Samuel Gaist (17 September 2020 11:51) > +1 Also +1 - and there was I thinking he surely was an approver already. Definitely way past time to catch up on that, Eddy. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver
+1 Mårten From: Development on behalf of Edward Welbourne Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 13:43 To: André Hartmann Cc: alex197...@gmail.com; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver On 17 Sep 2020, at 11:37, André Hartmann wrote: >> I like to propose Alex Trotsenko as approver. Samuel Gaist (17 September 2020 11:51) > +1 Also +1 - and there was I thinking he surely was an approver already. Definitely way past time to catch up on that, Eddy. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver
On 17 Sep 2020, at 11:37, André Hartmann wrote: >> I like to propose Alex Trotsenko as approver. Samuel Gaist (17 September 2020 11:51) > +1 Also +1 - and there was I thinking he surely was an approver already. Definitely way past time to catch up on that, Eddy. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 11:37, André Hartmann wrote: > > Hi all, > > I like to propose Alex Trotsenko as approver. > > Alex has been contributing to Qt since 2014, and has done *a lot* > of low level optimization and fixes. He has a deep knowledge of > QIODevice, Q*Socket, QProcess, and related classes. > > Furthermore, he is also an active and helpful reviewer. His constructive > feedback makes changes better and improves the overall Qt quality. > > All this makes me believe he will be a good approver. > > Now the interesting part: > > His patches: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:alex1973tr%2540gmail.com > > And his reviews: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:alex1973tr%2540gmail.com > > Best regards, > André Seconded. Alex is clearly not afraid to go where few others dare to even set a breakpoint, and he does ask for and listens to comments and feedback. Volker ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 11:37, André Hartmann wrote: > > Hi all, > > I like to propose Alex Trotsenko as approver. > > Alex has been contributing to Qt since 2014, and has done *a lot* > of low level optimization and fixes. He has a deep knowledge of > QIODevice, Q*Socket, QProcess, and related classes. > > Furthermore, he is also an active and helpful reviewer. His constructive > feedback makes changes better and improves the overall Qt quality. > > All this makes me believe he will be a good approver. > > Now the interesting part: > > His patches: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:alex1973tr%2540gmail.com > > And his reviews: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:alex1973tr%2540gmail.com > > Best regards, > André > ___ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development +1 Best regards Samuel -- Samuel Gaist Senior Research And Development Engineer Idiap Research Institute, Centre du Parc, CH-1920 Martigny http://www.idiap.ch/ signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] [Announce] Qt Creator 4.13.1 released
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 4.13.1 ! https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-creator-4.13.1-released -- Eike Ziller Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Erich-Thilo-Straße 10 D-12489 Berlin eike.zil...@qt.io http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B ___ Announce mailing list annou...@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/announce ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Proposing Alex Trotsenko as approver
Hi all, I like to propose Alex Trotsenko as approver. Alex has been contributing to Qt since 2014, and has done *a lot* of low level optimization and fixes. He has a deep knowledge of QIODevice, Q*Socket, QProcess, and related classes. Furthermore, he is also an active and helpful reviewer. His constructive feedback makes changes better and improves the overall Qt quality. All this makes me believe he will be a good approver. Now the interesting part: His patches: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:alex1973tr%2540gmail.com And his reviews: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:alex1973tr%2540gmail.com Best regards, André ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
