Re: [Development] Licensing of qtbase
On 3.8.2022, 15.21, "Development on behalf of Benjamin TERRIER" mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of b.terr...@gmail.com<mailto:b.terr...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 13:05, Florian Bruhin mailto:m...@the-compiler.org>> wrote: https://www.qt.io/product/features?hsLang=en#js-6-3 lets you see the individual components of Qt and what license they are available as. > That's some high level of FUD and BS. > If I select LGPLv3, all Qt tools are greyed out (moc, qmake, Qt Creator, > etc.). > Sure these tools are themselves not licensed under LGPLv3, but nothing > prevents them from being used for LGPLv3 projects. Indeed. If using means running here, GPLv3 sets no limitations for running the unmodified version of the SW. Limitations are related to the modified SW. And GPLv3 is compatible with LGPLv3, but then the combination will be GPLv3-licensed. I did not put these license details on the features page. Small clarification would not hurt. > Ang given the text at the top of the page: Please select a [...] license model, [...] programming language to see, what items are available for that selection. > it will clearly make some people think that one cannot use these tools with > LGPLv3 projects. > Especially because when selecting a language it will filter based on which > languages can be used with a tool, not which languages a tool is developed > with. I agree this is a little bit counter-intuitive. In one place we talk about development licenses and in another place using the SW. I will try to clarify this. -- Tino Pyssysalo Maintainer of Qt features page ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt IFW and Online Installer 4.3.0 released today
Hi, We are proud to announce that Qt Installer Framework and Online Installer 4.3.0 have been released today. More details are provided in the related blog post https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-online-installer-4.3.0-released -- BR, Tino Pyssysalo IFW and installer PO The Qt Company ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Online Installer and Installer Framework 4.2.0 released today
I’m happy to announce about the release of a new Qt Online Installer and Installer Framework 4.2.0. Read the blog post about the exciting improvements https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-online-installer-4.2.0-released. -- Tino Pyssysalo The Qt Company Installer PO ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Online Installer 4.1.1 has been released
Hello, Qt Online Installer 4.1.1 has been released. The version contains an updated default installations page to improve the first-time user experience + several fixes. For further details, please read https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-online-installer-4.1.1-released. -- Tino Pyssysalo The Qt Company Installer product owner ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt website showing template
Hello, The problem was a human error related to A/B testing. It was fixed yesterday and should not occur anymore. -- Tino Pyssysalo On 27.5.2021, 10.23, "Development on behalf of Eike Ziller" wrote: > On May 27, 2021, at 08:28, Nibedit Dey wrote: > > Hi Qt Team, > > I think the issue occurs when there is a script blocker like AdBlockPlus is running on the browser. > I guess the content is loaded through a script that replaces the template. When the script is blocked the template appears. You need to add a message to disable the script blocker or add default contents on the homepage. > > I don't know whether it is the right mail thread to discuss this topic. Can someone at Qt's website maintenance team look at the issue? I suppose the best way of reporting the problem would be to open an issue at https://bugreports.qt.io/projects/QTWEBSITE with component “qt.io” Br, Eike > Thanks & Regards, > Nibedit > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:43 AM Nibedit Dey wrote: > Hi Qt Team, > > qt.io shows a template. Can you fix the link or restore the home page? > Refer to the screenshot below: > > > > Thanks & Regards, > Nibedit > ___ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development -- Eike Ziller Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Erich-Thilo-Straße 10 D-12489 Berlin eike.zil...@qt.io http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Installer Framework 4.1 released
Hi all, We are happy to announce that Qt Installer Framework 4.1 has been released. At the same time Qt Online Installer and Qt Maintenance Tool have been updated to use the new Installer Framework. More details in the blog post https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-installer-framework-4.1-released. Thanks for everyone, who has contributed in terms of developing, reviewing, and providing valuable improvement suggestions to us. -- Tino Pyssysalo ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Online Installer 4.0.1-1 released
Hello, I’m happy to announce that Qt Online Installer 4.0.1-1 has been released. In this version, open-source users can select the mirror to download metadata and packages. By default, the mirror is still selected automatically, but users can select another mirror in the command line. In addition, UI fixes for the new UI style, introduced in 4.0.1, have been done. Further details in the blog post https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-online-installer-4.0.1-1-released. -- Tino Pyssysalo The Qt Company Installer PO ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Installer Framework 4.0 released
Hi all, We are happy to announce that Qt Installer Framework 4.0 and Online Installer / Maintenance Tool 4.0 have been released today. Please, read the details in the related blog post https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-installer-framework-4.0-released. -- Tino Pyssysalo Qt Installer product owner ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Online Installer and Maintenance Tool 4.0 beta released - testers wanted
Hi all, We are happy to announce that Qt Online Installer and Maintenance Tool 4.0 beta have been released. We are about one month away from the final release, so we invite all Qt users to start using and testing the new installer. It has completely renewed CLI experience, significant performance improvements in terms of meta-data download speed. Also the UI has been modified here and there based on the user suggestions. Please download the installer from http://download.qt.io/development_releases/online_installers/ and start using it today. The installer uses the same package repos as Installer 3.x, so it is possible to install standard production packages with it. We look forward to getting your feedback. You can find ready-made links and further information in a related blog post in https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-online-installer-4.0-beta-released Thanks for all contributors for this – especially the development team. -- Tino Pyssysalo Installer PO ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Online Installer 4.0 pre-alpha released today
Qt Online Instaler and Maintenance Tool 4.0 pre-alpha have been released today. In this release, the main effort has been in the CLI support development to provide users with an improved unattended installation experience. Please, read more in https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-online-installer-4.0-pre-alpha-released -- Tino Pyssysalo Installer Product Owner The Qt Company ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Arttu Tarkiainen as approver
+1 -- Tino Pyssysalo Senior Product Manager The Qt Company On 10.3.2020, 14.00, "Development on behalf of Katja Marttila" mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of katja.martt...@qt.io<mailto:katja.martt...@qt.io>> wrote: Hi all, I’d like to nominate Arttu Tarkiainen as approver for the Qt Project. Arttu has been working in the installer team as a SW developer since he joined the Qt Company about one year ago. First as a trainee and currently as full-time employee. Arttu has been focusing mainly to improve and maintain Installer Framework and proven to be very skilful developer. I’ll trust that he will use the approver rights responsibly and follow the Qt guidelines. Here is the list of his changes: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:arttu.tarkiainen%2540qt.io Br, Katja Marttila Software Engineer | Maintainer of Installer Framework The Qt Company | Finland | Oulu ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering
On 14.2.2020, 22.17, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 January 2020 19:31:34 PST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 28 January 2020 03:52:49 PST Tino Pyssysalo wrote:
> > > It is also possible to transfer the qtaccount.ini file to a CI
machine,
> > > which removes the need for manual/interactive login. The qtaccount.ini
> > > just
> > > contains the hash of the password.
> >
> > I suggest you be very careful in suggesting how to transfer the
> > qtaccount.ini file. Test half a dozen public CI systems and give
> > instructions to them all.
> >
> > And specifically tell people NOT to "git add" it to a project on GitHub/
> > GitLab/BitBucket.
>
> Hello Tino
>
> Can we get an answer here?
>
> What is the recommended way to install Qt on a CI to test a Qt-based
> application?
>
> Travis CI has stopped working completely and I'd like to switch to GitHub
> Actions. Does The Qt Company recommend I use Stephan Binner's PPA? Or
does it
> want me to use its own compiled binaries? If the latter, please provide
> instructions for automated builds.
Actually, we do not have a good support to install Qt on a (public) CI.
Currently, it's
done with scripting: ./installer --script myScript.qs
However, this does not solve the issue of providing the credentials. It is
possible
to read credentials from the environment variables
https://doc.qt.io/qtinstallerframework/scripting-installer.html#environmentVariable-method.
BUT WE DO NOT RECOMMEND anyone to upload the credentials to CI, even
If it is possible to hide them in GitHub.
The next installer (4.0) will allow accessing qtaccout.ini via the env variable,
but it's still heavily under development.
Meanwhile, the JWT token in qtaccount.ini could be possibly used as a session
Token, but we need to investigate this further.
As I said not a good solution right now, but we'll study a few workarounds
to have a better support right now.
Controller.prototype.CredentialsPageCallback = function()
{
var page = gui.pageWidgetByObjectName("CredentialsPage");
/*** Login widget */
page.loginWidget.EmailLineEdit.setText();
page.loginWidget.PasswordLineEdit.setText();
Or using signup widget
/*** Signup widget */
page.signupWidget.SignUpLineEdit.setText();
page.signupWidget.SignUpPasswordLineEdit.setText();
page.signupWidget.SignUpPasswordVerifyEdit.setText();
page.signupWidget.ServiceTermsCheckBox.setChecked(true);
gui.clickButton( buttons.NextButton);
}
--
Tino Pyssysalo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering
The problem must be somewhere else. There are no installer changes in production yet. -- Tino Pyssysalo Qt Installer Product Owner On 31.1.2020, 11.09, "Development on behalf of Mark De Wit" wrote: > I'm guessing the Qt installer has now been updated in line with the licensing changes? > > I've just had the first developer in our team come up to me to complain that they can't install Qt My usual response of click the skip button appears to no longer work. And no, I'm not going to ask 45 developers in > this company to create Qt accounts, that's a non-starter... > > Mark ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Marketplace
Inside The Qt Company, we have identified three values of the marketplace to the developer. 1. To get products in one single location. Currently, most of the products are from inqlude.org and KDE framework + from a couple of our vendors. There are new contributions from vendors all the time, so the product base is growing. Hopefully, we have more our own products in the marketplace soon. However, I agree with you that this alone is not very valuable to the developer. 2. Contributions in the marketplace are validated by Qt. Right now, we test them rather randomly, but the goal is to add them part of our automated testing as well. 3. Source builds. Our goal from the beginning was to have similar UX to Visual Studio Code to build products from the sources. The development is in progress and the plan is to release Marketplace 2.0 in May. At the high level, the idea is the following: - Developers browse Marketplace products in Qt Creator or directly in Marketplace. Selecting a product in Qt Creator launches the marketplace, where the product description is shown. - Developer picks up one or more products. Marketplace handles the payments if any. - The product is enabled in the Online Installer. Installer still has an important role in license management, even though it can be used in a headless way from any IDE in the future. - Product repo contains a Conan recipe. Conan takes care of getting/building the dependencies. - Product is added to an existing project. The product is built inside the project using one kit to avoid unnecessary builds for targets, not needed. This is what we have planned to during the next five months. -- Tino Pyssysalo On 10.1.2020, 12.56, "Development on behalf of Alexander Ivash" wrote: In its current state Qt Marketplace is imho nearly useless - it looks like just one more https://inqlude.org/ What would be much more helpful is not *just* a list of libraries but also simple way to install it. Is there any plans to implement package manager for Qt Marketplace? Or maybe adopt https://github.com/Cutehacks/qpm/ ? ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Marketplace launched
Hello all Qt developers, Today The Qt Company have launched Qt Marketplace at https://qt.io/marketplace. Qt Marketplace is an innovation platform for our community, bringing together Qt developers looking for new ways to enhance Qt and develop workflow. We would like to invite you for populating the marketplace with all fantastic extensions, add-ons, modules … that has been done with Qt. We have wanted to make it easy for both individual developers and companies to publish extensions in the marketplace and to be able to reach the whole Qt ecosystem. Whether you are doing a new Qt module just for fun, want to find new ways to expand your existing product sales channels, or are thinking of trying a new business idea, we got you covered. The publisher guidelines are available inhttps://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Marketplace_Publisher_Guidelines. We have been putting our efforts in developing the marketplace, but without our active community, there would not be any content. We were very fortunate to have a dedicated bunch of early adopters both working with us during the development process and onboarding their extensions to the marketplace. We now have the first 100 extensions there. Please, check our blog post https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-marketplace for further details. You can find the marketplace from qt.io/marketplace<http://marketplace.qt.io> so go ahead and give it a try! -- Tino Pyssysalo Product Manager The Qt Company ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] To improve UX of the online installer
Thanks for your valuable comments and feedback. Please find my comments online > (A) Downloading metadata is very time-consuming. We have recognized the problem as well and considered several options to solve this issue https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTIFW-975. You have excellent points about how to group the repositories. We will take those into account when we plan metadata downloading further. Downloading less metadata, would make the whole download process less vulnerable to network errors. There have been discussions around a retry/resume button and we will evaluate its need after we have evaluated the effect of repository grouping on download time. Obviously, you other suggestions will be considered as well. > (B) The automatic mirror selection algorithm doesn't always pick the best > mirror. Adding a select/deselect all button in the repositories view or allowing user to choose mirrors, should be rather easy to do. We will consider these. > (C) (New users) It's not clear how to choose what to install. There has been quite a lot of effort in planning and even implementing different approaches to tackle this. Simple default installation would be easy for newbies, but deciding what the default actually means, is challenging. User may have several toolchains installed and it's difficult to decide in the first installation, for which toolchain the user wants to install Qt libraries. This could be asked separately, but in the end the user would have the same component tree view anyway. To minimise the number of installable components in a Qt version, we have considered removing the checkbox, so that the user is forced to open Qt X.X node and choose components explicitly. However, we would lose the 'partially checked' feature, used by many. We could maybe implement something that the "Qt 5.9.4" node is not selectable but would still show the 'partially checked' mark. Showing additional screens before the component view, would move the complexity of component selection from the installer tree view to some screens. We have also received some feedback that the number of screens is already too high. So, we have been considering simplifying the views https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-62671 by using different categories/groups, which define the visible components to the user. This should simplify the first-time installation experience. Someone may want to install Qt Creator only, but giving a warning, if now Qt target is chosen is a good idea. --- Tino Pyssysalo Senior Manager Product management The Qt Company --- On 03/04/2018, 3.14, "Development on behalf of Sze Howe Koh" <development-bounces+tino.pyssysalo=qt...@qt-project.org on behalf of szehowe@gmail.com> wrote: 3 broad issues impede new users who want to start using Qt and frustrate old users who want to update Qt: (A) Downloading metadata is very time-consuming. (B) The automatic mirror selection algorithm doesn't always pick the best mirror. (C) (New users) It's not clear how to choose what to install. == Factors that contribute to (A) include: * The metadata downloader opens lots of short-duration TCP connections. Wireshark revealed 2391 HTTP GET requests from 77.86.229.90 (download.qt.io) on Windows. This process is less painful on Linux (1205 GETs -- almost half of Windows') as there are fewer compilers/platforms. * Downloading many small files is very inefficient compared to downloading a few large files. While GET-ting metadata from download.qt.io, my network traffic crawls at ~10 KiB/s (yes, ten kibibytes). After this, the actual binaries download from my designated mirror at ~1 MiB/s, which shows that metadata downloader doesn't make good use of available bandwidth. I'm in Australia. * MaintenanceTool downloads metadata too frequently (QTIFW-975). * If the metadata download fails halfway (e.g. one file times out), the whole process needs to start from scratch. There is no retry/resume. This makes the online installer nigh unusable if the user's connection to download.qt.io is flaky: https://forum.qt.io/post/450076 * Currently, there is a way to manually avoid downloading unwanted metadata: Deselecting the unwanted Temporary Repositories. However, all 91 Repositories must be unchecked one-by-one, and this process must be repeated each time MaintenanceTool is restarted: https://forum.qt.io/post/450076 == Evidence for (B) include: * Geographical proximity does not imply mirror quality. E.g. a user from China finds Chinese mirrors too slow, and opts for non-Chinese mirrors instead: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2013-December/010336.html
Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator
I’ll clarify little bit, as my earlier comment about “any backend” has been confusing. I requested a repo for a QtCreator analytics plugin, but we realized why not to use a similar solution in other tools as well. I want to concentrate on a Qt Creator plugin first to fully understand the problem domain. Once that is done we can discuss how to move forward with this project”. Our intention is usage data collection, but nothing else at this point. Obviously, we plan to use the collected data to improve Qt. As a concrete example, we have provided a lot of nice features in Qt Quick Designer in the recent Qt Creator releases, but we have no idea, if the use of Qt Quick Designer has changed in any way. This kind of data would be very valuable to us. -- Tino On 23/02/2018, 14.28, "Adam Treat" <adam.tr...@qt.io<mailto:adam.tr...@qt.io>> wrote: +1 to playground This is open source... by all means experiment! As long as no laws are being broken and no licenses violated, then if their is an itch... scratch it! The person who codes decides. We can all judge the results by looking at the code. Useless to have stop energy about a plug-in that does not yet exist. It could be great or it could be a lousy failure, but opening up a playgrounds repo costs no one anything. From: Development <development-bounces+adam.treat=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@qt.io> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 3:00:33 AM To: Pasi Keränen; Tino Pyssysalo; Tuukka Turunen; qt-crea...@qt-project.org; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator Hi, Given that no plan has been presented about how this is intended to work in terms of backend or API scope, I stand with my -1 for a qt/ or qt-creator/ repo. If there exists no plan yet but the desire to experiment, then I'm with Pasi here and would suggest a repository in the playground scope. I think either analytics or telemetry make sense to have in the name. Firebase for example uses the term analytics in their API and Mozilla uses the term telemetry for the service of collecting performance and usage info for Firefox. Simon From: Pasi Keränen Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 8:53:33 AM To: Maurice Kalinowski; Tino Pyssysalo; Simon Hausmann; Tuukka Turunen; qt-crea...@qt-project.org; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator Hi, Repos can be relocated to new homes if really needed, but I think it’s fair to say more generic location is definitely preferred from Qt 3D Studio point of view. To make this even easier I’d even start with a playground repo if nothing else can be found. Qt has always been (despite our vocal and sometimes a bit harsh dialogue) inclusive, so it should be fine to go and experiment with all things UI related. Just to see if something is worth the effort or not. Regards, Pasi From: Development <development-bounces+pasi.keranen=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Maurice Kalinowski <maurice.kalinow...@qt.io> Date: Friday, 23 February 2018 at 9.33 To: Tino Pyssysalo <tino.pyssys...@qt.io>, Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@qt.io>, Tuukka Turunen <tuukka.turu...@qt.io>, "qt-crea...@qt-project.org" <qt-crea...@qt-project.org>, "development@qt-project.org" <development@qt-project.org> Subject: Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator “The idea is to develop a generic library/plugin, which anyone could use for analytics” If that is the case, then qt-creator/telemetry is the wrong repository to ask for. If you are aiming at something generic, then it should be qt/ Maurice Von: Qt-creator [mailto:qt-creator-bounces+maurice.kalinowski=qt...@qt-project.org] Im Auftrag von Tino Pyssysalo Gesendet: Thursday, February 22, 2018 2:59 PM An: Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@qt.io>; Tuukka Turunen <tuukka.turu...@qt.io>; qt-crea...@qt-project.org; development@qt-project.org Betreff: Re: [Qt-creator] [Development] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator Hi, The idea is to develop a generic library/plugin, which anyone could use for analytics. The backend can be any storage and The Qt Company does not provide that. We plan to use the same backend, which we already use in online installers to collect statistics about installations. At least in case of Qt Creator, the plan is to make some analysis results available for the community. Obviously, we do not do that for our commercial tooling. Analytics is opt-in and disabled by default in Qt Creator. We plan to ask user in the installer, if the user wish to participate in Qt UX improvement. If the answers is no, the analytics pl
Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator
Hi, The idea is to develop a generic library/plugin, which anyone could use for analytics. The backend can be any storage and The Qt Company does not provide that. We plan to use the same backend, which we already use in online installers to collect statistics about installations. At least in case of Qt Creator, the plan is to make some analysis results available for the community. Obviously, we do not do that for our commercial tooling. Analytics is opt-in and disabled by default in Qt Creator. We plan to ask user in the installer, if the user wish to participate in Qt UX improvement. If the answers is no, the analytics plugin is never installed. When the creator is started for the first time, it will show a dialog, consisting a list of collected data items and an option to enable/disable the plugin. There will be a new output pane, which shows collected data, conversions methods, if any used, and transmitted data to the user. -- Tino On 22/02/2018, 15.26, "Simon Hausmann" <simon.hausm...@qt.io<mailto:simon.hausm...@qt.io>> wrote: Hi, Can you provide a bit more information about how this plugin / frontend fits into the Qt project? Where is the collected data sent to and how is it accessible to the community? (-1 from me, as I think this needs to be clarified) Simon From: Development <development-bounces+simon.hausmann=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Tuukka Turunen <tuukka.turu...@qt.io> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 2:14:14 PM To: Tino Pyssysalo; qt-crea...@qt-project.org; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator Hi, +1 for creating the repo, but what about qt/qtanalytics as a name? This item could be useful also for other applications. Yours, Tuukka From: Qt-creator <qt-creator-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Tino Pyssysalo <tino.pyssys...@qt.io> Date: Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 13.04 To: "qt-crea...@qt-project.org" <qt-crea...@qt-project.org> Subject: [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator Description: Telemetry plugin (frontend) to collect usage data from Qt Creator to help improving Qt, Qt features, and Qt tools. Non-personal data items, such as duration the user spent in design mode, will be collected in a way, which is completely transparent to the user. Responsible: Tino Pyssysalo Repository: qt-creator/plugin-telemetry --- Tino Pyssysalo Senior Manager The Qt Company Hämeenkatu 14 C 25 33100 Tampere, Finland tino.pyssys...@qt.io<mailto:tino.pyssys...@qt.io> +358 40 8615475 http://qt.io<http://qt.io/> The future is Written with Qt --- ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
