Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

2014-02-06 Thread Albert Astals Cid
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 17:45:35 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Regarding Qt 5.2.2 - let's see how well 5.2.1 is received. We have now 1,5
 months shorter cycle than the usual 6 months for Qt 5.3. I agree that it
 was a long wait between 5.1.1 and 5.2.0.

FWIW with my Canonical hat we would appreciate a 5.2.x release with 
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-36430 and 
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-36289 fixed. We can distro-
patch but having it in an official release makes it easier for everyone.

Cheers,
  Albert

 
 Yours,
 
 Tuukka
 
 Lähettäjä: development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=digia@qt-project.org
 [development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=digia@qt-project.org]
 k#228;ytt#228;j#228;n Gladhorn Frederik [frederik.gladh...@digia.com]
 puolesta Lähetetty: 5. helmikuuta 2014 17:46
 Vastaanottaja: development@qt-project.org
 Aihe: Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?
 
 We have the branch model to make it easy to choose the right branch, usually
 without worrying about the releases too much.
 
 Normal bug fixes go always to stable.
 Stable is guaranteed to be merged into dev before the next release, so
 you'll never have to worry, no patch gets lost.
 
 Show stoppers just before the release might have to go into the release
 branch, this should really be the exception.
 
 Sometimes a bug is less critical and/or involves huge changes, these may
 have to go into the dev branch pending the approvers and your judgement.
 
 By the way, I heard quite a few requests for more patch releases, maybe we
 should aim for 5.2.2 with hopefully only stability improvements.
 
 Greetings,
 Frederik
 
 
 From: development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org
 [development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf
 of Giuseppe D'Angelo [dange...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 05,
 2014 4:19 PM
 To: jl...@kde.org
 Cc: development@qt-project.org
 Subject: Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?
 
 On 5 February 2014 15:55, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I've seeing contradictory advice on Gerrit as to which branch to push bug-
  fixes to, some say there will be no 5.2.2 so to use dev instead, others
  say to keep using stable in case there is.  What is the current
  official policy?
  
  Oh, and please remember when making such decisions to clearly communicate
  them to this list, not everyone is in the office or on IRC.
 
 The policy didn't change, see Where to push a change?
 
 http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines
 
 It doesn't matter that 5.2.2 is not planned. If the change qualifies
 for stable, push it to stable.
 
 --
 Giuseppe D'Angelo
 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
 ___
 Development mailing list
 Development@qt-project.org
 http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


[Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

2014-02-05 Thread John Layt
Hi,

I've seeing contradictory advice on Gerrit as to which branch to push bug-
fixes to, some say there will be no 5.2.2 so to use dev instead, others say to 
keep using stable in case there is.  What is the current official policy?

Oh, and please remember when making such decisions to clearly communicate them 
to this list, not everyone is in the office or on IRC.

Thanks!

John.

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

2014-02-05 Thread Knoll Lars
For now the policy is still to push to stable. We haven’t made any
decision on whether to do or not do a 5.2.2 release yet, but it’s
something we need to figure out rather soon.

Cheers,
Lars

On 05/02/14 15:55, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:

Hi,

I've seeing contradictory advice on Gerrit as to which branch to push bug-
fixes to, some say there will be no 5.2.2 so to use dev instead, others
say to 
keep using stable in case there is.  What is the current official
policy?

Oh, and please remember when making such decisions to clearly communicate
them 
to this list, not everyone is in the office or on IRC.

Thanks!

John.

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

2014-02-05 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 5 February 2014 15:55, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
 Hi,

 I've seeing contradictory advice on Gerrit as to which branch to push bug-
 fixes to, some say there will be no 5.2.2 so to use dev instead, others say to
 keep using stable in case there is.  What is the current official policy?

 Oh, and please remember when making such decisions to clearly communicate them
 to this list, not everyone is in the office or on IRC.

The policy didn't change, see Where to push a change?

http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines

It doesn't matter that 5.2.2 is not planned. If the change qualifies
for stable, push it to stable.

-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

2014-02-05 Thread Gladhorn Frederik
We have the branch model to make it easy to choose the right branch, usually 
without worrying about the releases too much.

Normal bug fixes go always to stable.
Stable is guaranteed to be merged into dev before the next release, so you'll 
never have to worry, no patch gets lost.

Show stoppers just before the release might have to go into the release branch, 
this should really be the exception.

Sometimes a bug is less critical and/or involves huge changes, these may have 
to go into the dev branch pending the approvers and your judgement.

By the way, I heard quite a few requests for more patch releases, maybe we 
should aim for 5.2.2 with hopefully only stability improvements.

Greetings,
Frederik


From: development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org 
[development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of 
Giuseppe D'Angelo [dange...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:19 PM
To: jl...@kde.org
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

On 5 February 2014 15:55, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
 Hi,

 I've seeing contradictory advice on Gerrit as to which branch to push bug-
 fixes to, some say there will be no 5.2.2 so to use dev instead, others say to
 keep using stable in case there is.  What is the current official policy?

 Oh, and please remember when making such decisions to clearly communicate them
 to this list, not everyone is in the office or on IRC.

The policy didn't change, see Where to push a change?

http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines

It doesn't matter that 5.2.2 is not planned. If the change qualifies
for stable, push it to stable.

--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

2014-02-05 Thread Turunen Tuukka

Hi,

Regarding Qt 5.2.2 - let's see how well 5.2.1 is received. We have now 1,5 
months shorter cycle than the usual 6 months for Qt 5.3. I agree that it was a 
long wait between 5.1.1 and 5.2.0. 

Yours,

Tuukka

Lähettäjä: development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=digia@qt-project.org 
[development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=digia@qt-project.org] 
k#228;ytt#228;j#228;n Gladhorn Frederik [frederik.gladh...@digia.com] 
puolesta
Lähetetty: 5. helmikuuta 2014 17:46
Vastaanottaja: development@qt-project.org
Aihe: Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

We have the branch model to make it easy to choose the right branch, usually 
without worrying about the releases too much.

Normal bug fixes go always to stable.
Stable is guaranteed to be merged into dev before the next release, so you'll 
never have to worry, no patch gets lost.

Show stoppers just before the release might have to go into the release branch, 
this should really be the exception.

Sometimes a bug is less critical and/or involves huge changes, these may have 
to go into the dev branch pending the approvers and your judgement.

By the way, I heard quite a few requests for more patch releases, maybe we 
should aim for 5.2.2 with hopefully only stability improvements.

Greetings,
Frederik


From: development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org 
[development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of 
Giuseppe D'Angelo [dange...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:19 PM
To: jl...@kde.org
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Bug fixes to Stable or Dev branch?

On 5 February 2014 15:55, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
 Hi,

 I've seeing contradictory advice on Gerrit as to which branch to push bug-
 fixes to, some say there will be no 5.2.2 so to use dev instead, others say to
 keep using stable in case there is.  What is the current official policy?

 Oh, and please remember when making such decisions to clearly communicate them
 to this list, not everyone is in the office or on IRC.

The policy didn't change, see Where to push a change?

http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines

It doesn't matter that 5.2.2 is not planned. If the change qualifies
for stable, push it to stable.

--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development