Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Who is the third party in that case? The third party at http://qt.nokia.com/forms/summit-signup is Nokia. Sorry for not being more explicit in the first place. -- Quim ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Op 14-4-2012 12:08, Sivan Greenberg schreef: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Quim Gilquim@nokia.com wrote: Still a third party from a Qt Project point of view but I guess one that you are more used to trust. Sorry, it was the fastest and simplest way to save us from handling emails manually. Who is the third party in that case? Gitorious, I assume, as that is the hosting party of qt-project.org, right? André ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
On 04/12/2012 06:54 PM, ext quim@nokia.com wrote: Alright, forget all this. Let me arrive at home and change the wiki page. I will start by asking people to send me an email with those fields. Any improvement from that lowest point is welcome. Alexandra has been kind enough to provide a patch: a form hosted at http://qt.nokia.com/forms/summit-signup Still a third party from a Qt Project point of view but I guess one that you are more used to trust. Sorry, it was the fastest and simplest way to save us from handling emails manually. PS: But we need to find the right alternative for handling collaborative data online with satisfactory privacy terms. -- Quim ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
On 04/11/2012 02:23 PM, ext André Pönitz wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process, like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody. If you say so... http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki There will be at least one person who is not even remotely amused about the prospect to have to enter personal data into some random document hosted at some third party site. Interesting. Can I ask what is your concern? Every time someone registers to some third party event s/he uses some third party site. This is no exception. Last year a 3rd party service was used as well afair. The alternative would have been to use something within http://qt-project.org - but what? We didn't want to bring more work to Marius co installing services and we actually are reusing as much as Qt DevNet as possible, The personal data requested is mostly public anyway? Also, if you send it to me via email guess what I will do: store it in the same online spreadsheet since that is the space used by the organizers and all badges are printed from there. And the random document has been defined from scratch and reviewed extensively at the Qt Project [Marketing] mailing list. -- Quim ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:44:36PM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: On 04/11/2012 02:23 PM, ext André Pönitz wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process, like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody. If you say so... http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki There will be at least one person who is not even remotely amused about the prospect to have to enter personal data into some random document hosted at some third party site. Interesting. Can I ask what is your concern? Every time someone registers to some third party event s/he uses some third party site. There seems to be a misunderstanding concerning the term third party here. In that what I consider a usual registration process _two_ parties are involved: A person who wants to attend an event, and the host of the event. The host typically promises to use the attendee's personal data only for the purpose of the event, to not pass it on to third parties etc, and the attendee typically trusts the host of the event to stick to the promise. The registration setup you choose for the summit involves a third party as man in the middle which neither the host nor the attendee has any business with, let alone controls in any way. On the contrary, by using the services of said third party one agrees to their terms and conditions, put into writing in several pages of legalese, not all of it harmless to the uninitiated on first sight. This is no exception. Last year a 3rd party service was used as well afair. I don't really remember filling in a form hosted at google. But I admit that doesn't mean much. The alternative would have been to use something within http://qt-project.org - but what? We didn't want to bring more work to Marius co installing services and we actually are reusing as much as Qt DevNet as possible, The alternatives range from a hand crafted web page on qt-project.org to using plain email and manual transfer into a database. Total effort for a 200 person event in both cases less than a day. And I'd rather volunteer to key in the data personally instead of spending the time discussing basic privacy concerns. The personal data requested is mostly public anyway? [mostly perhaps. But even if so, it would not matter in this particular context. Availability does not imply the right to use it without consent, at least not over here.] Also, if you send it to me via email guess what I will do: store it in the same online spreadsheet [...] I would feel more comfortable if you could at least try to pretend that a Qt Project community manager acknowledges the existence of the concept of privacy, and does not feed personal data of members of the community into _anything_ outside the reach of the Qt Project without the consent of the person concerned. [...] since that is the space used by the organizers and all badges are printed from there. I can take care of a badge. No worries ;-) Andre' ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Quim, I agree with André on this one. Google's terms and policies are quite complicated, and it's not right for the Qt Project to force anyone to abide by their terms. We need to stop using their spreadsheet and find other ways to organize the information you need to keep tabs on the Contributor Summit. A simple highlight of one of the terms for Google Docs (underline, bolding and eliding by me) from http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/ @ 2012-04-12 20:30: When you upload or otherwise submit content to our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (...), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content. -- .marius -Original Message- From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext André Pönitz Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:34 PM To: Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley) Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open! On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:44:36PM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: On 04/11/2012 02:23 PM, ext André Pönitz wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process, like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody. If you say so... http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki There will be at least one person who is not even remotely amused about the prospect to have to enter personal data into some random document hosted at some third party site. Interesting. Can I ask what is your concern? Every time someone registers to some third party event s/he uses some third party site. There seems to be a misunderstanding concerning the term third party here. In that what I consider a usual registration process _two_ parties are involved: A person who wants to attend an event, and the host of the event. The host typically promises to use the attendee's personal data only for the purpose of the event, to not pass it on to third parties etc, and the attendee typically trusts the host of the event to stick to the promise. The registration setup you choose for the summit involves a third party as man in the middle which neither the host nor the attendee has any business with, let alone controls in any way. On the contrary, by using the services of said third party one agrees to their terms and conditions, put into writing in several pages of legalese, not all of it harmless to the uninitiated on first sight. This is no exception. Last year a 3rd party service was used as well afair. I don't really remember filling in a form hosted at google. But I admit that doesn't mean much. The alternative would have been to use something within http://qt-project.org - but what? We didn't want to bring more work to Marius co installing services and we actually are reusing as much as Qt DevNet as possible, The alternatives range from a hand crafted web page on qt-project.org to using plain email and manual transfer into a database. Total effort for a 200 person event in both cases less than a day. And I'd rather volunteer to key in the data personally instead of spending the time discussing basic privacy concerns. The personal data requested is mostly public anyway? [mostly perhaps. But even if so, it would not matter in this particular context. Availability does not imply the right to use it without consent, at least not over here.] Also, if you send it to me via email guess what I will do: store it in the same online spreadsheet [...] I would feel more comfortable if you could at least try to pretend that a Qt Project community manager acknowledges the existence of the concept of privacy, and does not feed personal data of members of the community into _anything_ outside the reach of the Qt Project without the consent of the person concerned. [...] since that is the space used by the organizers and all badges are printed from there. I can take care of a badge. No worries ;-) Andre' ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.orgmailto:Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Ok. The system we have now was discussed and agreed in the [Marketing] list in a thread that lasted several days followed by a wait of more days until the Alpha was released. It's a system that works, takes little time to manage and is allowing us to get mew participants registered as we speaks. Who can work on a better system? Please, go ahead and we will adopt it. In the meantime I will handle manually and locally those participants not willing to submit their data. In the meantime I'm for keeping the current registration open. I understand the theoretical concern but for this case and for the low sensitiveness of the data being gathered (mostly public) I don't see the point of stopping the registration process before having a replacement. Is that ok? -- Quim On 4/12/12 6:39 PM Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin) wrote: Quim, I agree with André on this one. Google's terms and policies are quite complicated, and it's not right for the Qt Project to force anyone to abide by their terms. We need to stop using their spreadsheet and find other ways to organize the information you need to keep tabs on the Contributor Summit. A simple highlight of one of the terms for Google Docs (underline, bolding and eliding by me) from http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/ @ 2012-04-12 20:30: “When you upload or otherwise submit content to our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (…), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content.” -- .marius -Original Message- From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext André Pönitz Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:34 PM To: Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley) Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open! On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:44:36PM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: On 04/11/2012 02:23 PM, ext André Pönitz wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process, like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody. If you say so... http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki There will be at least one person who is not even remotely amused about the prospect to have to enter personal data into some random document hosted at some third party site. Interesting. Can I ask what is your concern? Every time someone registers to some third party event s/he uses some third party site. There seems to be a misunderstanding concerning the term third party here. In that what I consider a usual registration process _two_ parties are involved: A person who wants to attend an event, and the host of the event. The host typically promises to use the attendee's personal data only for the purpose of the event, to not pass it on to third parties etc, and the attendee typically trusts the host of the event to stick to the promise. The registration setup you choose for the summit involves a third party as man in the middle which neither the host nor the attendee has any business with, let alone controls in any way. On the contrary, by using the services of said third party one agrees to their terms and conditions, put into writing in several pages of legalese, not all of it harmless to the uninitiated on first sight. This is no exception. Last year a 3rd party service was used as well afair. I don't really remember filling in a form hosted at google. But I admit that doesn't mean much. The alternative would have been to use something within http://qt-project.org - but what? We didn't want to bring more work to Marius co installing services and we actually are reusing as much as Qt DevNet as possible, The alternatives range from a hand crafted web page on qt-project.org to using plain email and manual transfer into a database. Total effort for a 200 person event in both cases less than a day. And I'd rather volunteer to key in the data personally instead of spending the time discussing basic privacy concerns. The personal data requested is mostly public anyway? [mostly perhaps. But even if so, it would not matter in this particular context. Availability does not imply the right to use it without consent, at least not over here.] Also, if you send it to me via email guess what I will do: store it in the same online spreadsheet [...] I would feel more comfortable if you could at least try to pretend that a Qt Project community manager acknowledges the existence of the concept of privacy, and does not feed personal data of members of the community into _anything_ outside
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Alright, forget all this. Let me arrive at home and change the wiki page. I will start by asking people to send me an email with those fields. Any improvement from that lowest point is welcome. Quim On 4/12/12 6:50 PM Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley) wrote: Ok. The system we have now was discussed and agreed in the [Marketing] list in a thread that lasted several days followed by a wait of more days until the Alpha was released. It's a system that works, takes little time to manage and is allowing us to get mew participants registered as we speaks. Who can work on a better system? Please, go ahead and we will adopt it. In the meantime I will handle manually and locally those participants not willing to submit their data. In the meantime I'm for keeping the current registration open. I understand the theoretical concern but for this case and for the low sensitiveness of the data being gathered (mostly public) I don't see the point of stopping the registration process before having a replacement. Is that ok? -- Quim On 4/12/12 6:39 PM Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin) wrote: Quim, I agree with André on this one. Google's terms and policies are quite complicated, and it's not right for the Qt Project to force anyone to abide by their terms. We need to stop using their spreadsheet and find other ways to organize the information you need to keep tabs on the Contributor Summit. A simple highlight of one of the terms for Google Docs (underline, bolding and eliding by me) from http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/ @ 2012-04-12 20:30: “When you upload or otherwise submit content to our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (…), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content.” -- .marius -Original Message- From: development-bounces+marius.storm-olsen=nokia.com@qt- project.org [mailto:development-bounces+marius.storm- olsen=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ext André Pönitz Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:34 PM To: Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley) Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open! On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:44:36PM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: On 04/11/2012 02:23 PM, ext André Pönitz wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process, like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody. If you say so... http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki There will be at least one person who is not even remotely amused about the prospect to have to enter personal data into some random document hosted at some third party site. Interesting. Can I ask what is your concern? Every time someone registers to some third party event s/he uses some third party site. There seems to be a misunderstanding concerning the term third party here. In that what I consider a usual registration process _two_ parties are involved: A person who wants to attend an event, and the host of the event. The host typically promises to use the attendee's personal data only for the purpose of the event, to not pass it on to third parties etc, and the attendee typically trusts the host of the event to stick to the promise. The registration setup you choose for the summit involves a third party as man in the middle which neither the host nor the attendee has any business with, let alone controls in any way. On the contrary, by using the services of said third party one agrees to their terms and conditions, put into writing in several pages of legalese, not all of it harmless to the uninitiated on first sight. This is no exception. Last year a 3rd party service was used as well afair. I don't really remember filling in a form hosted at google. But I admit that doesn't mean much. The alternative would have been to use something within http://qt-project.org - but what? We didn't want to bring more work to Marius co installing services and we actually are reusing as much as Qt DevNet as possible, The alternatives range from a hand crafted web page on qt-project.org to using plain email and manual transfer into a database. Total effort for a 200 person event in both cases less than a day. And I'd rather volunteer to key in the data personally instead of spending the time discussing basic privacy concerns. The personal data requested is mostly public anyway? [mostly perhaps. But even if so, it would not matter in this particular context. Availability does not imply the right to use it without consent, at least not over here.] Also, if you send it to me via email guess what I will do: store it in the same online
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process, like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody. http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki REQUEST AN INVITATION [docs.google.com] Direct link with a free ad ;) http://tinyurl.ms/50kb -- Quim ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote: Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process, like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody. If you say so... http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki There will be at least one person who is not even remotely amused about the prospect to have to enter personal data into some random document hosted at some third party site. Andre' ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
I believe that Simon is the module maintainer in Qt Project sense. Kenneth From: development-bounces+kenneth.r.christiansen=nokia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+kenneth.r.christiansen=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley) Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:50 PM To: si...@omniqueue.com; jesus.palen...@openbossa.org Cc: development@qt-project.org; market...@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open! Qt WebKit counts just like any other Qt module. In case of doubt get an indication or invitation from the module maintainers. Quim On 4/4/12 10:41 AM ext Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote: From the registration page: Reasons for Attending. What are webkit people considered?! We don't fit as maintainers neither as approvers. =/ Cheers, -jesus yet another QtWebKit Gerrit Outlaw 2012/4/4 Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com: We now have a human friendly URL for the registration page (Thanks Thiago the reminder): http://tinyurl.ms/50kb -Sivan On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com wrote: reserve your place. [0]: http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit committers that are contributors to the Qt port. Quim, what do you think? Simon -- Sendt fra min Nokia N904.04.12 19:51 skrev Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley): Qt WebKit counts just like any other Qt module. In case of doubt get an indication or invitation from the module maintainers. Quim On 4/4/12 10:41 AM ext Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote: From the registration page: Reasons for Attending. What are webkit people considered?! We don't fit as maintainers neither as approvers. =/ Cheers, -jesus yet another QtWebKit Gerrit Outlaw 2012/4/4 Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com: We now have a human friendly URL for the registration page (Thanks Thiago the reminder): http://tinyurl.ms/50kb -Sivan On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote: reserve your place. [0]: http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
IMO that's reasonable. They are an equal part of the Qt community as anybody else, since it benefits Qt directly. -- .marius On 04/06/2012 08:01 AM, ext simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote: I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit committers that are contributors to the Qt port. Quim, what do you think? Simon -- Sendt fra min Nokia N904.04.12 19:51 skrev Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley): Qt WebKit counts just like any other Qt module. In case of doubt get an indication or invitation from the module maintainers. Quim On 4/4/12 10:41 AM ext Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote: From the registration page: Reasons for Attending. What are webkit people considered?! We don't fit as maintainers neither as approvers. =/ Cheers, -jesus yet another QtWebKit Gerrit Outlaw 2012/4/4 Sivan Greenbergsi...@omniqueue.com: We now have a human friendly URL for the registration page (Thanks Thiago the reminder): http://tinyurl.ms/50kb -Sivan On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Sivan Greenbergsi...@omniqueue.com wrote: reserve your place. [0]: http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- .marius ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM, simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote: I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit committers that are contributors to the Qt port. Quim, what do you think? I second that as well, I also want to make sure how we can include folks out of the Necessitas project as well. -Sivan ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
On 04/06/2012 06:01 AM, Hausmann Simon (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote: I think it would be great if we could extend the invitations to WebKit committers that are contributors to the Qt port. Quim, what do you think? Sure, this is what I meant when I wrote Qt WebKit counts just like any other Qt module. In case of doubt get an indication or invitation from the module maintainers. The doubt is not about QtWebKit contributors in general but about a specific guy interested. Just like any other module. The only concern (in general) is that maintainers and core approvers just leave registration for tomorrow - and tomorrow (or are not really aware that this is happening) and then the 225 seats are taken by others. I hope the Qt Project meritocracy does an effective work top-down making sure that whoever needs to be in Berlin registers soon. Note also that all this discussion about invitations is orthogonal to sponsoring travel and accommodation for participants. If the person requesting the invitation is also requesting e.g. 1.500€ valued travel sponsorship then this is a separate discussion that is purely related with the event budget. -- Quim ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
We now have a human friendly URL for the registration page (Thanks Thiago the reminder): http://tinyurl.ms/50kb -Sivan On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote: reserve your place. [0]: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDB6WkgzQW0yVmI0VXktaGt4bENDN2c6MQtheme=0AX42CRMsmRFbUy03NThiZTgyMi1iNWZiLTQ1ZTUtYmJkZi00ZDMzODQ4NzA5YWIifq ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
From the registration page: Reasons for Attending. What are webkit people considered?! We don't fit as maintainers neither as approvers. =/ Cheers, -jesus yet another QtWebKit Gerrit Outlaw 2012/4/4 Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com: We now have a human friendly URL for the registration page (Thanks Thiago the reminder): http://tinyurl.ms/50kb -Sivan On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote: reserve your place. [0]: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDB6WkgzQW0yVmI0VXktaGt4bENDN2c6MQtheme=0AX42CRMsmRFbUy03NThiZTgyMi1iNWZiLTQ1ZTUtYmJkZi00ZDMzODQ4NzA5YWIifq ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Qt WebKit counts just like any other Qt module. In case of doubt get an indication or invitation from the module maintainers. Quim On 4/4/12 10:41 AM ext Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote: From the registration page: Reasons for Attending. What are webkit people considered?! We don't fit as maintainers neither as approvers. =/ Cheers, -jesus yet another QtWebKit Gerrit Outlaw 2012/4/4 Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com: We now have a human friendly URL for the registration page (Thanks Thiago the reminder): http://tinyurl.ms/50kb -Sivan On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com wrote: reserve your place. [0]: http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list si...@omniqueue.commailto:si...@omniqueue.com http://tinyurl.ms/50kb ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
Hello Everybody! Now that we have a successful Qt5 Alpha release, we have a complementary event to celebrate it, the wonderful Qt Contributors' Summit. If you want to influence where Qt is headed, and engage in fruit full, yet fun sessions and discussions about the future of Qt, this event is for you. Plus, you don't want to evening treat in the form of super cool Qt social activity in the evening. We've opened the registration[0], as approval for participation is required (on a first come, first served basis). So hurry up and reserve your place. We hope we see you in Berlin this June! -Sivan (on behalf of the organization team). [0]: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDB6WkgzQW0yVmI0VXktaGt4bENDN2c6MQtheme=0AX42CRMsmRFbUy03NThiZTgyMi1iNWZiLTQ1ZTUtYmJkZi00ZDMzODQ4NzA5YWIifq ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt Summit 2012 Registration is now open!
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote: this event is for you. Plus, you don't want to evening treat in the form of super cool Qt social activity in the evening. Ah...I typed too fast.. Of course I meant you *do not* want to miss the evening treat! ;) Sorry for the extra noise, but the night event last time was so much fun I had to fix this. Thank you for your attention, -Sivan ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
