Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
Yes, that repo is dead, and I don’t see it coming alive again. Let’s remove it from qt5.git, mark the repo with an abandoned comment and maybe commit something into it’s top level directory stating the same. As far as I remember it’s not too much work to move it to a different location in gerrit. If that’s the case, I'd move it to some abandoned/dead tree. Cheers, Lars On 19/09/14 22:57, Robin Burchell robin...@viroteck.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy jeremy.k.l...@gmail.com wrote: It’s the repo hosted on qt-project.org and clones such as qt.gitorious.org that I’m wondering about. Leaving qtjsondb at its current URL is not what I would expect for something that is not part of the Qt 5 bundle. Do we start a qt-abandoned tree? qtplayground is too optimistic. We have plenty of other code in similar circumstances (qtwayland pre-5.4, qtpim, ...) that aren't released but may be Some Day (or might not, if nobody cares about them). I don't think the URL really says all that much about something necessarily, and moving things around is a hassle (technically and socially) I'd just leave it ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
On Thursday 18 September 2014 21:46:27 Jeremy wrote: I don’t see an issue with removing it from Qt 5. Is there a general plan for modules that exit from production-ready status? Modules that exit from production-ready status need to go through the deprecation ladder: first Done, then Deprecated (with possibly a replacement), and then finally Removed. The package should be made to compile with future versions of Qt. That's what we did for Qt Script Classic, Qt Assistant ADP, QHttp, QFtp, etc. However, let's be clear: QtJsondb never achieved production-ready status. It never left pre-alpha state and was never released. There's no one using it. Simply remove the link from qt5.git and leave the repo to rot. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
On 5September2014, at 21:57, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Thursday 18 September 2014 21:46:27 Jeremy wrote: I don’t see an issue with removing it from Qt 5. Is there a general plan for modules that exit from production-ready status? Modules that exit from production-ready status need to go through the deprecation ladder: first Done, then Deprecated (with possibly a replacement), and then finally Removed. The package should be made to compile with future versions of Qt. That's what we did for Qt Script Classic, Qt Assistant ADP, QHttp, QFtp, etc. However, let's be clear: QtJsondb never achieved production-ready status. It never left pre-alpha state and was never released. There's no one using it. Simply remove the link from qt5.git and leave the repo to rot. It’s the repo hosted on qt-project.org and clones such as qt.gitorious.org that I’m wondering about. Leaving qtjsondb at its current URL is not what I would expect for something that is not part of the Qt 5 bundle. Do we start a qt-abandoned tree? qtplayground is too optimistic. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy jeremy.k.l...@gmail.com wrote: It’s the repo hosted on qt-project.org and clones such as qt.gitorious.org that I’m wondering about. Leaving qtjsondb at its current URL is not what I would expect for something that is not part of the Qt 5 bundle. Do we start a qt-abandoned tree? qtplayground is too optimistic. We have plenty of other code in similar circumstances (qtwayland pre-5.4, qtpim, ...) that aren't released but may be Some Day (or might not, if nobody cares about them). I don't think the URL really says all that much about something necessarily, and moving things around is a hassle (technically and socially) I'd just leave it ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
RIP qtjsondb, takk for ingenting On Sep 19, 2014 1:58 PM, Robin Burchell robin...@viroteck.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy jeremy.k.l...@gmail.com wrote: It’s the repo hosted on qt-project.org and clones such as qt.gitorious.org that I’m wondering about. Leaving qtjsondb at its current URL is not what I would expect for something that is not part of the Qt 5 bundle. Do we start a qt-abandoned tree? qtplayground is too optimistic. We have plenty of other code in similar circumstances (qtwayland pre-5.4, qtpim, ...) that aren't released but may be Some Day (or might not, if nobody cares about them). I don't think the URL really says all that much about something necessarily, and moving things around is a hassle (technically and socially) I'd just leave it ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
The qtjsondb module is dead. It doesn't build since ages and has zero users. As civilized people we should bury our dead. Therefore I'd like to request the removal of qtjsondb from Qt's mother repository. Please raise any objections here or on codereview: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/95086/ BR, Joerg ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@digia.com wrote: The qtjsondb module is dead. It doesn't build since ages and has zero users. As civilized people we should bury our dead. Therefore I'd like to request the removal of qtjsondb from Qt's mother repository. Please raise any objections here or on codereview: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/95086/ It was one of the modules i was looking forward to while Qt 5.0 was in development. It seemed to be quite promising at the time. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
On 17-Sep-14 11:13, Mark Gaiser wrote: It was one of the modules i was looking forward to while Qt 5.0 was in development. It seemed to be quite promising at the time. The alternative to removal is fixing. Are you stepping up? :) BR, Joerg ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Joerg Bornemann joerg.bornem...@digia.com wrote: On 17-Sep-14 11:13, Mark Gaiser wrote: It was one of the modules i was looking forward to while Qt 5.0 was in development. It seemed to be quite promising at the time. The alternative to removal is fixing. Are you stepping up? :) No :) I don't even know if i would use it. It just seemed promising. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
