Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]

2002-02-06 Thread Darrell May


Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 And thats going well...

At least they tried.  No one else has done better.

 Im not sure how in touch people here are with kernel development,
because
 I wouldnt be rushing to stick the latest and greatest 2.4 kernel on any
 machine other than crash and burn machines, choose your 2.4 kernel very
 carefully, ask anyone who used 2.4.11...

Good point and exactly why I thought to not use a standard RedHat release
and instead favour a distro, like 'krud' or 'SGI XFS' that releases a bug
patched kernel.  In fact maybe a return to revisit SGI XFS is warranted. 
They have a tremendously large high availability server base and their
kernel build is more thoroughly tested.

Regards,

-- 
Darrell May
DMC Netsourced.com
http://netsourced.com
http://myEZserver.com


--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org




RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]

2002-02-06 Thread Brandon Friedman

Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 And thats going well...

At least they tried.  No one else has done better.

What has happened to axonlinux?

 -- 
Regards
Brandon Friedman
Product Manager

Tech-Knowledgy Advantage
Ph:  +27 (011) 486-0626
Fax: +27 (011) 486-0629
Cell: +27 (083) 408-7840
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.techknowledgy.co.za
PO Box 1909, Houghton, 2041 South Africa
No. 1 Mowbray Road, Greenside, Johannesburg, South Africa
Mitel Networks Authorized Partners

--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org




RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]

2002-02-06 Thread Les Mikesell

I haven't had much trouble with Mandrake 8.1 systems other
than their update system not being able to automatically
install their kernel update.  The things you get with it
are built-in support for installing on raid, with or without
LFS and all of the journal file systems, automatic device
detection for things like USB ethernet adapters and wireless
cards, and an install disk that works pretty well as a
rescue disk and attempts to detect and mount existing partitions.

  Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Craig Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:44 AM
 To: Devinfo@E-Smith. Org
 Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re:
 [e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]


 Anecdotal Evidence (tm) says that the RedHat 2.4.9 (includes patches) is
 the most reliable. (ie less panics _and_ page faults)
 I think the recent slashdot.org discussion also displayed a preference for
 RH2.4.9. So a stock Red Hat kernel isn't *that* bad after all :)
 I also think it's more appropriate to ask, What does 2.4.x bring to that
 table feature and reliability wise?
 For me, it's iptables and XFS/ext3/ReiserFS support.
 (Unless someone can show me a JFS for 2.2.x that works reliably and fits
 the e-smith^W Mitel model)

 Regards,

 Craig Foster

  -Original Message-
  From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2002 5:05 PM
  To: Damien Curtain; Darrell May
  Cc: stephen noble; e-smith-devinfo
  Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re:
  [e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]
 
  Good point and exactly why I thought to not use a standard
  RedHat release
  and instead favour a distro, like 'krud' or 'SGI XFS' that
  releases a bug
  patched kernel.  In fact maybe a return to revisit SGI XFS
  is warranted.
  They have a tremendously large high availability server
  base and their
  kernel build is more thoroughly tested.
 
  Regards,
 
  --
  Darrell May
  DMC Netsourced.com
  http://netsourced.com
  http://myEZserver.com
 



--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org




RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo]krud? + X]

2002-02-06 Thread Charlie Brady


On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote:

 Damien Curtain [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
  And thats going well...
 
 At least they tried.  No one else has done better.

 What has happened to axonlinux?

Disappeared without a trace.

--
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer
Network Server Solutions Grouphttp://www.e-smith.com/
Mitel Networks Corporationhttp://www.mitel.com/
Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000  Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739



--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org




[e-smith-devinfo] SME on top of a distro [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] krud? + X]

2002-02-05 Thread Darrell May


stephen noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 would you like to remind us briefly how difficult it
 would be to place SME on top of a redhat distro

If we take axonlinux as a project that has travelled this path already,
they built a new distro iso.  To be very brief they essentially took a
disto (SGI XFS) and added all the e-smith rpms that the distro did not
include by default.  After that you dive under the hood and test what works,
what doesn't work, modify the templates as appropriate, rebuild rpms that
need updating, add new rpms, bundle and build into a new iso... and
axonlinux was born.

Skill level required to do the above is high but anyone with time and
resources may challenge this.

Unfortunately I am deeply involed in other major projects at the moment. If
someone else would lead this project I will offer my assistance to get you
going.  I followed axonlinux and have enough knoweldge myself to be at least
a resource that might know an answer or two ;-

As time permits and as my schedule clears, I'll be happy to join in a more
fuller capacity.

Regards,

-- 
Darrell May
DMC Netsourced.com
http://netsourced.com
http://myEZserver.com


--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org