[freenet-dev] a670382: Add code for obtaining the USK URI which was used to create the USKRetriever.
re: http://github.com/freenet/fred-staging/commit/bfcd376880641c6eb40 getURI() is used no where but in some log message. It is safe to return any value.
[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols
On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this > idea. I just added the mailbody as comment :) Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090519/aba5c06b/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-dev] Usability test results
On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a > useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use > exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens, > when the selected browser has no privacy mode enabled, while another has > it? This was and still is no real option. > Simple and easy is only the warning page, everyone sees it, everyone can > act as written there. All choices still open and if anyone chooses to act > like an idiot, it is his own problem. I agree, it sounds most reasonable, and it worked for me. Maybe it could be possible to reorder the list of freenet in the wizard / on the warning. Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090519/ba8dc915/attachment.pgp>
[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols
This is a very good idea! Please go here http://freenet.uservoice.c<http://freenet.uservoice.com/pages/8861-general/suggestions/94861-use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication> configuration<http://127.0.0.1:8080/forumviewthread.htm?threadid=7453=1=21> om/pages/8861-general/suggestions/94861-use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication<http://freenet.uservoice.com/pages/8861-general/suggestions/94861-use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this idea. On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for > communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the > possibility > that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the > internet). > > I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of ports normally used for > communication (ideally encrypted), so that encrypted data wouldn't draw > suspicions (and so we don't need to implement full steganography at once, > but > can move towards it). > > Maybe the option could include a list with the note "Only select services > you > DON'T want to run!" > > Some ideas, not all encrypted: > > - 2190/UDP TiVoConnect Beacon > - 2593/TCP,UDP RunUO?Ultima Online server > - 3723/TCP,UDP Used by many Battle.net Blizzard games (Diablo II, Warcraft > II, Warcraft III, StarCraft) > - 3724/TCP,UDP World of Warcraft Online gaming MMORPG > - 4000/TCP,UDP Diablo II game > - 6619/TCP,UDP odette-ftps, Odette File Transfer Protocol (OFTP) over > TLS/SSL > - 6891?6900/TCP,UDP Windows Live Messenger (File transfer) > - 6901/TCP,UDP Windows Live Messenger (Voice) > - 28910 Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection > > (all information from > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers > I'm sure there are more...) > > Is tehre any danger in using known ports? > > Best wishes, > Arne > > --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- > - singing a part of the history of free software - > http://infinite-hands.draketo.de > > ___ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090519/0200a1d7/attachment.html>
[freenet-dev] a670382: Add code for obtaining the USK URI which was used to create the USKRetriever.
re: http://github.com/freenet/fred-staging/commit/bfcd376880641c6eb40 getURI() is used no where but in some log message. It is safe to return any value. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Re: [freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols
On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunicationand vote (3 points) for this idea. I just added the mailbody as comment :) Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Re: [freenet-dev] Usability test results
On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote: Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens, when the selected browser has no privacy mode enabled, while another has it? This was and still is no real option. Simple and easy is only the warning page, everyone sees it, everyone can act as written there. All choices still open and if anyone chooses to act like an idiot, it is his own problem. I agree, it sounds most reasonable, and it worked for me. Maybe it could be possible to reorder the list of freenet in the wizard / on the warning. Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
