[freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[mambro]

Can you provide me an example of something I can implement to prove my
abilities?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland  wrote:

> On Saturday 12 Mar 2011 11:22:22 mambro wrote:
> > Hello,
> > do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
> > plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
> > some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?
>
> It is a good idea. It would be a fairly large project so we'd need to be
> sure you are a really good student though. But by all means put in a
> proposal. We'll need you to fix a small bug or implement a small feature to
> prove you are a reasonably capable coder, before we accept you. But as far
> as I know we haven't even been accepted into the programme yet ...
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

[freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[Matthew Toseland]

On Monday 14 Mar 2011 16:09:55 mambro wrote:
> Can you provide me an example of something I can implement to prove my
> abilities?

Well, like I said, we haven't been accepted yet.

But I suggest you have a look on the bug tracker. There are lots of small tasks 
that need implementing, or small bugs that need squashing, as well as lots of 
huge ones.
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/

There might be something on the wiki too ( http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org )

After you've had a look maybe email about it, or chat with us on IRC.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland  amphibian.dyndns.org
> > wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday 12 Mar 2011 11:22:22 mambro wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
> > > plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
> > > some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?
> >
> > It is a good idea. It would be a fairly large project so we'd need to be
> > sure you are a really good student though. But by all means put in a
> > proposal. We'll need you to fix a small bug or implement a small feature to
> > prove you are a reasonably capable coder, before we accept you. But as far
> > as I know we haven't even been accepted into the programme yet ...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 

[freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[Matthew Toseland]

On Saturday 12 Mar 2011 11:22:22 mambro wrote:
> Hello,
> do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
> plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
> some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?

It is a good idea. It would be a fairly large project so we'd need to be sure 
you are a really good student though. But by all means put in a proposal. We'll 
need you to fix a small bug or implement a small feature to prove you are a 
reasonably capable coder, before we accept you. But as far as I know we haven't 
even been accepted into the programme yet ...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 

[freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Hi Andrea, 

On Saturday 12 March 2011 12:22:22 mambro wrote:
> do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
> plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
> some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?

I do consider it as a good project, It is my major wish for freenet.

It might be a bit too big, though ? you need to ask toad about that.

Best wishes, 
Arne
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[Matthew Toseland]

On Saturday 12 Mar 2011 11:22:22 mambro wrote:
 Hello,
 do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
 plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
 some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?

It is a good idea. It would be a fairly large project so we'd need to be sure 
you are a really good student though. But by all means put in a proposal. We'll 
need you to fix a small bug or implement a small feature to prove you are a 
reasonably capable coder, before we accept you. But as far as I know we haven't 
even been accepted into the programme yet ...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[mambro]

Can you provide me an example of something I can implement to prove my
abilities?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
 wrote:

 On Saturday 12 Mar 2011 11:22:22 mambro wrote:
  Hello,
  do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
  plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
  some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?

 It is a good idea. It would be a fairly large project so we'd need to be
 sure you are a really good student though. But by all means put in a
 proposal. We'll need you to fix a small bug or implement a small feature to
 prove you are a reasonably capable coder, before we accept you. But as far
 as I know we haven't even been accepted into the programme yet ...

___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[Matthew Toseland]

On Monday 14 Mar 2011 16:09:55 mambro wrote:
 Can you provide me an example of something I can implement to prove my
 abilities?

Well, like I said, we haven't been accepted yet.

But I suggest you have a look on the bug tracker. There are lots of small tasks 
that need implementing, or small bugs that need squashing, as well as lots of 
huge ones.
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/

There might be something on the wiki too ( http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org )

After you've had a look maybe email about it, or chat with us on IRC.
 
 On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
  wrote:
 
  On Saturday 12 Mar 2011 11:22:22 mambro wrote:
   Hello,
   do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
   plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
   some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?
 
  It is a good idea. It would be a fairly large project so we'd need to be
  sure you are a really good student though. But by all means put in a
  proposal. We'll need you to fix a small bug or implement a small feature to
  prove you are a reasonably capable coder, before we accept you. But as far
  as I know we haven't even been accepted into the programme yet ...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Hi Andrea,

On Saturday 12 March 2011 12:22:22 mambro wrote:
 do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
 plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
 some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?

I do consider it as a good project, It is my major wish for freenet.

It might be a bit too big, though — you need to ask toad about that.

Best wishes,
Arne

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

[mambro]

Hello,
do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport
plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement
some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers?

Andrea
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: