[freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Matthew Toseland]

Because it is not time yet. We need to have load balancing sorted out
well before we implement opennet, for example. IMHO we also need to
have some clear benefits to getting darknet connections on an opennet
node.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:59:47AM +, Thomas Bruderer wrote:
> 
> > Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.
> 
> this year "perhaps"? 
> Why not?
> 
> 0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site anymore, if
> you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the users. So you let 
> both
> networks die.
> 
> So u splitted the small community, and push off the masses. I am not certain I
> should run a node, since you obviously not want us to run nodes.
> 
> I shutdown my node aswell... obviously its not needed...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> 

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 

[freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Marco A. Calamari]

On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 08:59 +, Thomas Bruderer wrote:
> > Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.
> 
> this year "perhaps"? 
> Why not?
> 
> 0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site anymore, if
> you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the users. So you let 
> both
> networks die.

For the Freenet contents it is certainly true.

I remember what happened 0.2 version ago .

The winning opinion here is that killing the
 previous version move resources to the
 new one.

The minority report say that each time
 we reset contents we lose a lot
 of angry publishers, that would
 be happy to maintain contents on both.

JM2C.   Marco

-- 

+--- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---+
| il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello |
| the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother  |
| Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it  http://www.marcoc.it   |
| DSS/DH:  8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B |
+ PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 --+

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: 

[freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Lean Fuglsang]

Den Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:59:47 +. skrev Thomas Bruderer:

> 
>> Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.
> 
> this year "perhaps"?
> Why not?
> 
> 0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site
> anymore, if you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the
> users. So you let both networks die.
> 
> So u splitted the small community, and push off the masses. I am not
> certain I should run a node, since you obviously not want us to run nodes.
> 
> I shutdown my node aswell... obviously its not needed...
Ubernode has not shut his freenet node down, but just a html page where
people could exchange noderefs. Darknet is alive and kicking, just keep on
using it and it will get better over time...

[freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Thomas Bruderer]

> Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.

this year "perhaps"? 
Why not?

0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site anymore, if
you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the users. So you let both
networks die.

So u splitted the small community, and push off the masses. I am not certain I
should run a node, since you obviously not want us to run nodes.

I shutdown my node aswell... obviously its not needed...

[freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Thomas Bruderer]

 Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.

this year perhaps? 
Why not?

0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site anymore, if
you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the users. So you let both
networks die.

So u splitted the small community, and push off the masses. I am not certain I
should run a node, since you obviously not want us to run nodes.

I shutdown my node aswell... obviously its not needed...





___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Lean Fuglsang]

Den Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:59:47 +. skrev Thomas Bruderer:

 
 Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.
 
 this year perhaps?
 Why not?
 
 0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site
 anymore, if you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the
 users. So you let both networks die.
 
 So u splitted the small community, and push off the masses. I am not
 certain I should run a node, since you obviously not want us to run nodes.
 
 I shutdown my node aswell... obviously its not needed...
Ubernode has not shut his freenet node down, but just a html page where
people could exchange noderefs. Darknet is alive and kicking, just keep on
using it and it will get better over time...


___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Marco A. Calamari]

On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 08:59 +, Thomas Bruderer wrote:
  Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.
 
 this year perhaps? 
 Why not?
 
 0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site anymore, if
 you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the users. So you let 
 both
 networks die.

For the Freenet contents it is certainly true.

I remember what happened 0.2 version ago .

The winning opinion here is that killing the
 previous version move resources to the
 new one.

The minority report say that each time
 we reset contents we lose a lot
 of angry publishers, that would
 be happy to maintain contents on both.

JM2C.   Marco

-- 

+--- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---+
| il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello |
| the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother  |
| Marco A. Calamari [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.marcoc.it   |
| DSS/DH:  8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B |
+ PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 --+



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Ubernode shutting down

[Matthew Toseland]

Because it is not time yet. We need to have load balancing sorted out
well before we implement opennet, for example. IMHO we also need to
have some clear benefits to getting darknet connections on an opennet
node.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:59:47AM +, Thomas Bruderer wrote:
 
  Not the near future. This year perhaps, but not the immediate future.
 
 this year perhaps? 
 Why not?
 
 0.5 seems officially deprecated since it's not on the project site anymore, if
 you dont know where to look, and 0.7 is just not for the users. So you let 
 both
 networks die.
 
 So u splitted the small community, and push off the masses. I am not certain I
 should run a node, since you obviously not want us to run nodes.
 
 I shutdown my node aswell... obviously its not needed...
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Devl mailing list
 Devl@freenetproject.org
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
 

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl