[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-27 Thread xor 
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:22:57 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > > And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
> > > way to get feedback from users.
> >
> > Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the
> > web-interface? Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text
> > "Report Bug".
>
> Wouldn't help in this case.
>
> > Should naturally be a freenet site or similar.
>
> If Freemail worked we could take bug reports over it. If Freetalk works we
> can take bug reports over that. 

Planned: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2987
Will take 1-3 months till I have time for it I guess, getting Freetalk to work 
is more important right now.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
> > way to get feedback from users.
> 
> Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface? 
> Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text "Report Bug". 

Wouldn't help in this case.
> 
> Should naturally be a freenet site or similar. 

If Freemail worked we could take bug reports over it. If Freetalk works we can 
take bug reports over that. As for an official freesite, we'd need a revocation 
mechanism (RSKs).
> 
> - Arne
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-27 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 25 May 2009 12:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> 
> After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on 
> #freenet, I decided to try it out:
> 
> $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar
> $jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar 
> jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable)

It is signed now.
> 
> Needless to say that it's the reason why it doesn't work. MacOS installs
> (and windows pre-UAC) have presumably been broken since we have migrated to
>  git/your build system

Windows uses the wininstaller, whether Vista or not.
> 
> And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We *NEED* to find a better
> way to get feedback from users.

True.
> 
> NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide 
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
> way to get feedback from users.

Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface? 
Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text "Report Bug". 

Should naturally be a freenet site or similar. 

- Arne

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
   - singing a part of the history of free software -
  http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 25 May 2009 12:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote:
 
 After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on 
 #freenet, I decided to try it out:
 
 $wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar
 $jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar 
 jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable)

It is signed now.
 
 Needless to say that it's the reason why it doesn't work. MacOS installs
 (and windows pre-UAC) have presumably been broken since we have migrated to
  git/your build system

Windows uses the wininstaller, whether Vista or not.
 
 And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We *NEED* to find a better
 way to get feedback from users.

True.
 
 NextGen$


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread Matthew Toseland 
On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
 On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote:
  And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
  way to get feedback from users.
 
 Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface? 
 Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text Report Bug. 

Wouldn't help in this case.
 
 Should naturally be a freenet site or similar. 

If Freemail worked we could take bug reports over it. If Freetalk works we can 
take bug reports over that. As for an official freesite, we'd need a revocation 
mechanism (RSKs).
 
 - Arne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-26 Thread xor 
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:22:57 Matthew Toseland wrote:
 On Monday 25 May 2009 22:30:17 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
  On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote:
   And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
   way to get feedback from users.
 
  Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the
  web-interface? Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text
  Report Bug.

 Wouldn't help in this case.

  Should naturally be a freenet site or similar.

 If Freemail worked we could take bug reports over it. If Freetalk works we
 can take bug reports over that. 

Planned: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2987
Will take 1-3 months till I have time for it I guess, getting Freetalk to work 
is more important right now.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-25 Thread Florent Daignière 

After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on 
#freenet, I decided to try it out:

$wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar
$jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar 
jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable)

Needless to say that it's the reason why it doesn't work. MacOS installs
(and windows pre-UAC) have presumably been broken since we have migrated to
 git/your build system

And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We *NEED* to find a better
way to get feedback from users.

NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-25 Thread Florent Daignière 

After reading the rants of a user complaining about javaws not working on 
#freenet, I decided to try it out:

$wget https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/new_installer_offline.jar
$jarsigner -verify new_installer_offline_1211.jar 
jar is unsigned. (signatures missing or not parsable)

Needless to say that it's the reason why it doesn't work. MacOS installs
(and windows pre-UAC) have presumably been broken since we have migrated to
 git/your build system

And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We *NEED* to find a better
way to get feedback from users.

NextGen$


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

2009-05-25 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide 
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote:
 And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
 way to get feedback from users.

Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface? 
Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text Report Bug. 

Should naturally be a freenet site or similar. 

- Arne

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
   - singing a part of the history of free software -
  http://infinite-hands.draketo.de


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl