Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec

2017-02-03 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d

On 02/02/2017 10:07 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:

> Cool, is there some place to make an issue for it?

Try the two links at the top of each page: "Report a bug" and "Improve 
this page"


> Don't want any unsuspecting goobers like me falling for it :P.

People who read those pages down to every colon deserve to suffer. :o) 
(Actually, I think you implied that one of your tools is parsing that page.)


Ali



Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec

2017-02-02 Thread FatalCatharsis via Digitalmars-d

On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 05:38:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:

On 02/02/2017 07:46 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis 
wrote:
(PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" 
rule at the
line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. 
Just spent
many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. 
Can
someone confirm or show an example where the colon is 
correctly

applied in the language?


Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule


Yes, definitely looks like a documentation bug. In all other 
places, there is always another symbol on the right hand side.


Ali


Cool, is there some place to make an issue for it? Don't want any 
unsuspecting goobers like me falling for it :P.


Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec

2017-02-02 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d

On 02/02/2017 07:46 PM, FatalCatharsis wrote:

On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:

(PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule at the
line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. Just spent
many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is that. Can
someone confirm or show an example where the colon is correctly
applied in the language?


Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule


Yes, definitely looks like a documentation bug. In all other places, 
there is always another symbol on the right hand side.


Ali



Re: Typo on the grammar section of the spec

2017-02-02 Thread FatalCatharsis via Digitalmars-d

On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 02:57:07 UTC, FatalCatharsis wrote:
(PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule 
at the line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after 
it. Just spent many hours troubleshooting and I believe my 
problem is that. Can someone confirm or show an example where 
the colon is correctly applied in the language?


Specifically on the NonVoidInitializer rule


Typo on the grammar section of the spec

2017-02-02 Thread FatalCatharsis via Digitalmars-d
(PLEASE) correct me if I'm wrong, but on the "Initializer" rule 
at the line with ExpInitializer should not have a colon after it. 
Just spent many hours troubleshooting and I believe my problem is 
that. Can someone confirm or show an example where the colon is 
correctly applied in the language?