Re: LLVM 7.0.0 no mention of D anymore
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 13:58:00 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 13:10:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-7 no mention of D anymore :( http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-6 http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-5 http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-4-0-0 I think Kai used to make sure every LLVM release worked and notified them to mention ldc. I don't he's had time to do much with ldc lately, so maybe it slipped through. Yep, see e.g. https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/commit/a56df96f1517be7cf8410cdbb190465ad630c1b8
Re: fearless v0.0.1 - shared made easy (and @safe)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:58:04AM +, thedeemon via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: > > I was envious of std::sync::Mutex from Rust and thought: can I use > > DIP1000 to make this work in D and be @safe? Turns out, yes. > > Nice! I spent a few minutes playing with the example and trying to > break it, make the pointer escape, but I couldn't, the compiler caught > me every time. This DIP1000 thing seems to be working! Finally, dip1000 is proving its value. T -- Doubt is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Re: LLVM 7.0.0 no mention of D anymore
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 13:10:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-7 no mention of D anymore :( http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-6 http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-5 http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-4-0-0 I think Kai used to make sure every LLVM release worked and notified them to mention ldc. I don't he's had time to do much with ldc lately, so maybe it slipped through.
Re: fearless v0.0.1 - shared made easy (and @safe)
On 9/19/18 6:44 AM, Atila Neves wrote: On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:34:10 UTC, 12345swordy wrote: On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: The `shared` keyword currently means one of two things: 1. You can use core.atomic with it 2. It's some struct and you BYOM (Bring Your Own Mutex) [...] Why is this is an external 3rd party library isn't of the standard library? Because it's far easier to release something with dub. If it gets traction then it might be a candidate for inclusion in Phobos. I'll also add that if it depends on dip1000, Phobos isn't ready for that anyway. But if Phobos does end up getting to that point, this 100% should be in the standard library. It's a no-brainer. -Steve
Re: LLVM 7.0.0 no mention of D anymore
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 13:10:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-7 no mention of D anymore :( http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-6 http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-5 http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-4-0-0 Hold your horses, it not exactly trivial for the ldc devs to update support to llvm 7 that just recently came out.
Re: LLVM 7.0.0 no mention of D anymore
On 20/09/2018 1:10 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote: http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-7 no mention of D anymore :( http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-6 http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-5 http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-4-0-0 "Supports LLVM 3.7 - 6.0." https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.12.0-beta1
LLVM 7.0.0 no mention of D anymore
http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-7 no mention of D anymore :( http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-6 http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-5 http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-4-0-0
Re: fearless v0.0.1 - shared made easy (and @safe)
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: I was envious of std::sync::Mutex from Rust and thought: can I use DIP1000 to make this work in D and be @safe? Turns out, yes. Nice! I spent a few minutes playing with the example and trying to break it, make the pointer escape, but I couldn't, the compiler caught me every time. This DIP1000 thing seems to be working!
Re: fearless v0.0.1 - shared made easy (and @safe)
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 07:33:55 UTC, Claude wrote: On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: I was envious of std::sync::Mutex from Rust and thought: can I use DIP1000 to make this work in D and be @safe? Turns out, yes. Beautiful! The only current downside, is the fact the application using that library has to be compiled with -dip1000 if I'm not wrong? Thanks! You only have to compile with -dip1000 if you want guarantees about safety... ;)
Re: fearless v0.0.1 - shared made easy (and @safe)
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:34:10 UTC, 12345swordy wrote: On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: The `shared` keyword currently means one of two things: 1. You can use core.atomic with it 2. It's some struct and you BYOM (Bring Your Own Mutex) [...] Why is this is an external 3rd party library isn't of the standard library? -Alexander Because it's far easier to release something with dub. If it gets traction then it might be a candidate for inclusion in Phobos.
Re: fearless v0.0.1 - shared made easy (and @safe)
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 17:20:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: I was envious of std::sync::Mutex from Rust and thought: can I use DIP1000 to make this work in D and be @safe? Turns out, yes. Beautiful! The only current downside, is the fact the application using that library has to be compiled with -dip1000 if I'm not wrong?
Re: GCC: Submission of D Front End, next round
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 20:00:21 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote: Just reposting here two links Johannes left in the Slack: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00931.html [...] This is great news! I am looking forward to it. I admire all the work and the persistence.
