Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta1

[kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 07:57:02 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:

I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : )


That's the plan anyway; plus this druntime regression most likely 
doesn't apply to LDC (atomics are highly compiler-specific).


To catch regressions like this earlier, it would certainly help 
if people used the beta compiler packages for their CI too; for 
Travis, it's as simple as adding additional jobs with `d: 
-beta`.

Re: LDC 1.19.0-beta1

[zoujiaqing via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 13:36:27 UTC, kinke wrote:


Please file a druntime issue, this is DMD.


Yes.
I mean you can waiting for dmd 2.089.1 to release ldc 1.9.0 : )

Thanks.