Re: DIP 1039--Static Arrays with Inferred Length--Withdrawn

2021-09-07 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 15:19:23 UTC, Dukc wrote:

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 15:06:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been accepted with a request for changes. Walter and Paul 
are working out the details.


Congratulations Paul!


This is why I didn't announce it yet. It isn't formally accepted 
until the changes are finalized. I have no reason to doubt that 
will be the end result, but there's always a chance that it won't 
be.


Re: Surprise - New Post on the GtkD Coding Blog

2021-09-07 Thread Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Friday, 3 September 2021 at 15:47:41 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Has it really been 15 months since I last posted an article? 
Um, yes. Yes, it has.


[...]


Welcome back! 


Re: Surprise - New Post on the GtkD Coding Blog

2021-09-07 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:29:14PM +, Dukc via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Friday, 3 September 2021 at 18:52:13 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
> > (i loathe and despise wayland but ill try not to rant)
> 
> Have you written more about this on your blog? I have read more than
> one piece that wishes good riddance of X in favour of Wayland, I'd
> like to read something about the "but" side.

I for one will *not* be happy about X being dropped in favor of Wayland,
esp. since the latter is not (yet?) at feature parity (or better) with
X.


T

-- 
Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've 
forgotten this before.


Re: DIP 1039--Static Arrays with Inferred Length--Withdrawn

2021-09-07 Thread Dukc via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 15:06:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
It's been accepted with a request for changes. Walter and Paul 
are working out the details.


Congratulations Paul!


Re: DIP 1039--Static Arrays with Inferred Length--Withdrawn

2021-09-07 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 13:00:43 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker 
wrote:

[snip]


Regarding DIPs, any news on status of DIP 1038? It has been on 
formal assesment over three months now.


It's been accepted with a request for changes. Walter and Paul 
are working out the details.


Re: DIP 1039--Static Arrays with Inferred Length--Withdrawn

2021-09-07 Thread Dukc via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Saturday, 4 September 2021 at 07:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

[snip]


Regarding DIPs, any news on status of DIP 1038? It has been on 
formal assesment over three months now.





Re: Surprise - New Post on the GtkD Coding Blog

2021-09-07 Thread Dukc via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Friday, 3 September 2021 at 18:52:13 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:

(i loathe and despise wayland but ill try not to rant)


Have you written more about this on your blog? I have read more 
than one piece that wishes good riddance of X in favour of 
Wayland, I'd like to read something about the "but" side.