Re: DConf '22 Day One Videos
On 9/26/22 14:48, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: I've finished editing uploading all of the videos for Day One of DConf. Thanks a lot, Mike! Also, to make life easier for yourself next DConf, consider uploading the raw video data somewhere public and issue a call for action. I had heaps of free time in August, could have helped editing a video or two per day.
Re: Beta 2.100.2
Hi, > Can only give an estimate as on top of the eye-watering EV prices As far as I know, EV certificates are only required for device drivers in Windows. An OV certificate plus timestamp should be enough to sign an executable for Windows. Hugo
Re: DConf '22 Day One Videos
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 12:48:54 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I've finished editing uploading all of the videos for Day One of DConf. You can find them here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIldXzSkPUXVDzfnBlXcqZF6GB_ejjkEn I hope to be able to pick up the pace a bit after this week. Nice work Mike, appreciated!
DConf '22 Day One Videos
I've finished editing uploading all of the videos for Day One of DConf. You can find them here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIldXzSkPUXVDzfnBlXcqZF6GB_ejjkEn I hope to be able to pick up the pace a bit after this week.
Re: Binary Literals Not Going Anywhere
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 04:40:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Before we got started, I asked him about the binary literal situation. He confirmed that they will not be deprecated. If you're using them today, you can keep using them tomorrow. neat!
Re: Binary Literals Not Going Anywhere
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 04:40:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: You may have seen [the long discussion about the deprecation of binary literals(https://forum.dlang.org/thread/vphguaninxedxopjk...@forum.dlang.org). A few hours ago, Walter and I recorded a second conversation for our YouTube channel. Before we got started, I asked him about the binary literal situation. He confirmed that they will not be deprecated. If you're using them today, you can keep using them tomorrow. That's good to hear as depreciating binary literals wouldn't make any sense. I first assumed that people made too much of the comment as sometimes you just say something like a speculative comment without too much meaning or afterthought. Then Walter got into the discussion at forum not really retracting what he said so that left many people wondering.
Re: Binary Literals Not Going Anywhere
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 04:40:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: You may have seen [the long discussion about the deprecation of binary literals(https://forum.dlang.org/thread/vphguaninxedxopjk...@forum.dlang.org). A few hours ago, Walter and I recorded a second conversation for our YouTube channel. Before we got started, I asked him about the binary literal situation. He confirmed that they will not be deprecated. If you're using them today, you can keep using them tomorrow.
Re: Binary Literals Not Going Anywhere
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 05:58:48 UTC, Markus wrote: An approved DIP would have been a prerequisite to their deprecation regardless, correct? No.
Re: Binary Literals Not Going Anywhere
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 06:19:05 UTC, Max Samukha wrote: Please do not take the backlash against the removal of binary literals as general aversion to breaking changes/deprecations. D has plenty to remove/deprecate I'm sure Walter didn't take it that way.
Re: Binary Literals Not Going Anywhere
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 04:40:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: You may have seen [the long discussion about the deprecation of binary literals(https://forum.dlang.org/thread/vphguaninxedxopjk...@forum.dlang.org). A few hours ago, Walter and I recorded a second conversation for our YouTube channel. Before we got started, I asked him about the binary literal situation. He confirmed that they will not be deprecated. If you're using them today, you can keep using them tomorrow. Please do not take the backlash against the removal of binary literals as general aversion to breaking changes/deprecations. D has plenty to remove/deprecate (and it is NOT `alias this`, unless that is replaced with a more general mechanism, such as `using` in Jai).
Re: Binary Literals Not Going Anywhere
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 04:40:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: You may have seen [the long discussion about the deprecation of binary literals(https://forum.dlang.org/thread/vphguaninxedxopjk...@forum.dlang.org). A few hours ago, Walter and I recorded a second conversation for our YouTube channel. Before we got started, I asked him about the binary literal situation. He confirmed that they will not be deprecated. If you're using them today, you can keep using them tomorrow. An approved DIP would have been a prerequisite to their deprecation regardless, correct?
