Re: Voting: std.logger
On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Results: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental The link to the team-phobos page doesn't work for me, so I'm not entirely sure what it is (list of users with commit rights?), but in any case, I don't think I'm on any such list (I don't have commit rights for Phobos).
Re: Voting: std.logger
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 21:23:20 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote: On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Results: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental The link to the team-phobos page doesn't work for me, so I'm not entirely sure what it is (list of users with commit rights?), but in any case, I don't think I'm on any such list (I don't have commit rights for Phobos). There was a mail list vote recently about adding you to Phobos commiters and remembering no objections I just presumed it has already happened :O (It should have been!)
Re: Voting: std.logger
On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Results: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental Seems like my vote (http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqis...@forum.dlang.org) went missing – not that it would change anything, of course (later in the thread, I pointed out some other (since fixed) issues, which was the more important part). I probably should've included 1) and 2) as separate bullet points to make counting easier. Cheers, David
Re: Voting: std.logger
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 20:51:48 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote: On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 02:55:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Results: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental Seems like my vote (http://forum.dlang.org/post/anzeespykooeiaqis...@forum.dlang.org) went missing – not that it would change anything, of course (later in the thread, I pointed out some other (since fixed) issues, which was the more important part). I probably should've included 1) and 2) as separate bullet points to make counting easier. Cheers, David Sorry! Unfortunately everyone keeps ignoring me asking to not start discussions in voting threads and some votes may slip through my attention :( Updated.
Re: Voting: std.logger
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:12:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote: x-post http://forum.dlang.org/post/vbotavcclttrgvzcj...@forum.dlang.org Results: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.logger#Voting_for_std.experimental tl; dr: concept approved but exact API needs work before it is ready for std.experimental, further discussions has moved to GitHuuntil it is ready. Important: I have adjusted some of votes based on new inclusion criteria defined by Andrei. If vote stated Yes but listed clear API change requirements, it was counted as No. Please have a look at the vote list to make sure I have not interpreted anything wrong.
