[Issue 4091] Small docs page about dynamic array implementation

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4091



--- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori  2010-04-16 
13:19:15 PDT ---
To understand a system programming language "abstraction", OOP and Grady Booch
are not the right way to go :3
Implementation is not abstract, it's concrete.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 3971] Syntax & semantics for array assigns

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971



--- Comment #4 from Sobirari Muhomori  2010-04-16 
13:08:07 PDT ---
a = b;  static  dynamic
static  Err2Err
dynamic Err OK2
^ As I understand, this disallows assignment of a static array to the dynamic
one?

Is this related to bug 3395?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4097] New: Error: can only declare type aliases within static if conditionals

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4097

   Summary: Error: can only declare type aliases within static if
conditionals
   Product: D
   Version: future
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P2
 Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: nfx...@gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-04-16 09:03:52 PDT ---
Look at this code:


void foo() { }
alias typeof(&foo) T;

// works
static if (is(T X : X*) && is(X == function)) {} else { static assert(false); }

// doesn't work
// Error: can only declare type aliases within static if conditionals
static assert(is(T X : X*) && is(X == function));


This looks really silly. Couldn't that restriction be lifted? The alias would
be only valid within the expression and wouldn't require a static if.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4096] New: nonzero timezone offset in UTC timestamp; wrong local time.

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4096

   Summary: nonzero timezone offset in UTC timestamp; wrong local
time.
   Product: D
   Version: future
  Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: graham.fawc...@gmail.com


--- Comment #0 from Graham Fawcett  2010-04-16 
06:16:57 PDT ---
In DMD Version 2.043, the following code should print a timestamp both
in UTC and local time. The local tzoffset is correct, but the UTC
tzoffset should not be nonzero. Furthermore, what claims to be the UTC
time is actually the localtime, and the so-called localtime is just
wrong. The code imports std.datebase to hack around the initialization
issue reported in #2965.

#!/usr/bin/dmd -run

import std.datebase;
import std.stdio;
import std.date;

void main() {
writefln("UTC:   %s", toString(getUTCtime()));
writefln("Local: %s", toString(UTCtoLocalTime(getUTCtime(;
}

$ TZ=EST5EDT date
Fri Apr 16 09:14:35 EDT 2010

$ TZ=EST5EDT ./timedemo.d
UTC:   Fri Apr 16 09:14:37 GMT-0400 2010
Local: Fri Apr 16 05:14:37 GMT-0400 2010

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---