[Issue 4275] New: Unexpected optlink termination when 'export' attribute is missing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4275 Summary: Unexpected optlink termination when 'export' attribute is missing Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Optlink AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: samu...@voliacable.com --- Comment #0 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-06-05 01:55:09 PDT --- Optlink crashes when 'export' is missing from an imported variable declaration. To reproduce, unzip the attached archive into a directory and run build.bat. Uncomment 'export' in main.d to make the testcase compile. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4275] Unexpected optlink termination when 'export' attribute is missing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4275 --- Comment #1 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2010-06-05 01:57:58 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=652) Optlink bug -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2933] Cannot return const/immutable with contracts (out/invariant) enabled
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2933 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-06-05 03:47:28 PDT --- Fixed when bug 3667 was fixed, in svn 490 (DMD 2.047). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 04:33:03 PDT --- I don't understand why arrays of inner structs shouldn't be possible. Is this just another seemingly random restriction with no real foundation of the dmd compiler? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-05 04:50:08 PDT --- Structs defined inside functions keep a hidden pointer field to the function they are into. If you return the array of nonstatic structs, the scope stops existing and this pointer points to garbage. To avoid this you need 'struct closures', but I prefer to avoid them. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 --- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 05:04:20 PDT --- So what? You _can_ have an array of closures. Why not an array of nested structs? The compiler should obviously allocate all variables referenced by the struct on the heap, just like it is done with closures. Otherwise, it's an half-implemented garbage feature that should be removed before it causes any more harm. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4276] New: CTFE error messages use random variable names
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4276 Summary: CTFE error messages use random variable names Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: jason.james.ho...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Jason House jason.james.ho...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 05:04:40 PDT --- Here's a sample that I hit: $ dmd -c *.d -offoo board.d(519): Error: variable __ctmp533 cannot be read at compile time board.d(519): Error: cannot evaluate __ctmp533.this(global_random) at compile time Bugzilla 3801 and Bugzilla 3730 also demonstrate this behavior but are not about error message quality. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4274] Better array of inner structs error message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 --- Comment #4 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 05:10:24 PDT --- I just tested it, and it seems for nested structs, the compiler correctly allocates upvalues on the heap. The error message you're receiving doesn't make any sense. At least the reason for it must different. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4277] New: delegate reference wrong scope var value
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4277
Summary: delegate reference wrong scope var value
Product: D
Version: 1.057
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: chang...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from changlon chang...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 07:27:33 PDT ---
---
extern(C) void printf(char*, ... );
interface MyCall{
void call(int);
}
class MyObject{
MyCall[] list;
void add(MyCall _mycall){
list~= _mycall ;
}
void call(int i){
foreach( c ; list) {
c.call(i);
}
}
}
class MyTest {
public void run(){
MyObject obj= new MyObject ;
test3(obj);
test2(obj);
test1(obj);
obj.call(3);
}
static void test1(char[] name = test1\0 )(MyObject obj){
printf(out: `%s` = `%x` \n\0.ptr , name.ptr, cast(void*) obj );
obj.add( new class( delegate(int i){
printf(in: `%s` = `%x` \n\0.ptr , name.ptr, cast(void*) obj );
} ) MyCall{
void delegate(int) dg;
this(void delegate(int) _dg){
this.dg= _dg;
}
void call(int i) {
dg(i);
}
} ) ;
}
void test2(MyObject obj){
test1!(test2\0)(obj);
}
void test3(ref MyObject obj){
test1!(test3\0)(obj);
}
}
void main(){
auto t= new MyTest;
t.run;
}
---
out: `test3` = `a42fe0`
out: `test2` = `a42fe0`
out: `test1` = `a42fe0`
in: `test3` = `414204`
in: `test2` = `414204`
in: `test1` = `12fe88`
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4276] CTFE error messages use random variable names
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4276 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-06-05 11:35:17 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Here's a sample that I hit: $ dmd -c *.d -offoo board.d(519): Error: variable __ctmp533 cannot be read at compile time board.d(519): Error: cannot evaluate __ctmp533.this(global_random) at compile time Bugzilla 3801 and Bugzilla 3730 also demonstrate this behavior but are not about error message quality. Such messages are references to compiler generated code. Each is a different bug; they don't have a common cause. A test case for this particular one would be valuable. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4263] Header generation omits '@system' attribute
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4263 --- Comment #1 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-06-05 13:00:25 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=653) Update the header generation to include missing @system and enum attributes There's likely other attributes that are missing. I was focused on fixing the two cases that Sean found. Also fixes issue 4262. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4262] Header generation omits 'enum' for enum declarations
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com --- Comment #1 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-06-05 13:01:28 PDT --- Fixed in the attachment to bug 4263. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4263] Header generation omits '@system' attribute
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4263 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #654|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #654 is|0 |1 patch|| -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
