[Issue 6599] ICE(constfold.c) On use of invalid expression as a compile-time initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6599 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-09-07 00:04:01 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) That's a strange place to get the error. I get an AV at constfold.c:1396. CatExp::optimize calls :optimize on fileProtocol (which does nothing) then passes it along to Cat, which crashes trying to access fileProtocol's type. It seems to happen for all operators: [snip] It is probably invalid to assume e-type has been set inside Cat and other constfold functions. No, it's valid. Those functions should only be called after the semantic pass was completed successfully on the expression. This is yet another gagging system bug. Repository is forward referenced from Orbit. Semantic is run on Repository with errors gagged. This semantic pass fails, but leaves Repository's members in an invalid state. If you move Orbit after Repository, you see the correct error messages. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6448] writef(%05d, BigInt) problem
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6448 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-09-07 00:11:38 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/568b04658df684118d769f10cb1f4a9413e8c9e5 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6599] ICE(constfold.c) On use of invalid expression as a compile-time initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6599 --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 17:32:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) That's a strange place to get the error. I get an AV at constfold.c:1396. CatExp::optimize calls :optimize on fileProtocol (which does nothing) then passes it along to Cat, which crashes trying to access fileProtocol's type. It seems to happen for all operators: [snip] It is probably invalid to assume e-type has been set inside Cat and other constfold functions. No, it's valid. Those functions should only be called after the semantic pass was completed successfully on the expression. This is yet another gagging system bug. Repository is forward referenced from Orbit. Semantic is run on Repository with errors gagged. This semantic pass fails, but leaves Repository's members in an invalid state. If you move Orbit after Repository, you see the correct error messages. Ok. That would make this another case of bug 4269? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6616] New: foreach argument type inference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616
Summary: foreach argument type inference
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-07 00:57:03 PDT ---
In this program the Foo struct is large, so I use ref to avoid its copies. I
also use const because I want to make sure (and document) the two loops will
not change the matrix contents:
struct Foo { int[1000] a; }
void bar(ref Foo x) {}
void main() {
auto m = new Foo[][](3, 3);
foreach (const(Foo[]) row; m)
foreach (ref const(Foo) x; row)
bar(x);
}
But I'd like type inference there, and be able to write something like:
struct Foo { int[1000] a; }
void bar(ref Foo x) {}
void main() {
auto m = new Foo[][](3, 3);
foreach (const row; m)
foreach (ref const x; row)
bar(x);
}
With DMD 2.055beta3 this gives:
test.d(5): no identifier for declarator const(row)
test.d(6): no identifier for declarator const(x)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6616] foreach argument type inference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 18:14:50 EST --- You're kidding me right? This is the THIRD time you've reported this exact bug. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4090 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4090 --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 18:14:50 EST --- *** Issue 6616 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4090 --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 18:15:11 EST --- *** Issue 5255 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5255] No foreach type inference with const
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5255 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 18:15:11 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4090 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3126] Char concatenation doesn't work for wstring
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3126 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 18:49:55 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 2169 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2169] Can't concat non-char[] string literal and char literal (D1 only)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2169 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfj1es...@sneakemail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 18:49:55 EST --- *** Issue 3126 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6616] foreach argument type inference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-07 02:07:39 PDT --- I am sorry. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6616] foreach argument type inference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6616 --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 19:15:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) I am sorry. Just don't forget to do a quick search first next time! I know you have over 200 enhancement requests open, but it might be worth going through and checking they all still make sense. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6618] New: TypeInfo_Struct.equals should prefer xopEquals than pointer equality
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6618
Summary: TypeInfo_Struct.equals should prefer xopEquals than
pointer equality
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: druntime
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 03:10:17 PDT ---
Following code should pass the assertion.
void main()
{
struct S
{
const bool opEquals(ref const S rhs)
{
return false;
}
}
S s;
assert(!typeid(S).equals(s, s));
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6618] TypeInfo_Struct.equals should prefer xopEquals than pointer equality
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6618 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 03:18:32 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/68 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6619] New: Forward a single field to a subfield, like alias this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6619
Summary: Forward a single field to a subfield, like alias
this
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: thecybersha...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-09-07
07:18:12 PDT ---
It would be nice if this worked:
struct S1 { int f; }
struct S2
{
S1 s1;
alias s1.f g;
}
The error message, which occurs only when trying to access g, is also
somewhat confusing:
Error: struct test.S2 'f' is not a member
Error: struct test.S2 member f is not accessible
Error: this for f needs to be type S1 not type S2
A more general solution would be to allow aliasing expressions, but it sounds
like a large language change which would require some discussion first.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6599] ICE(constfold.c) On use of invalid expression as a compile-time initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6599 --- Comment #4 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2011-09-07 09:26:43 PDT --- With DMD 1.069 I get the same error even when I place Repository before Orbit. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5713] Broken final switch on ints
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5713
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-07 10:15:54 PDT ---
An example from Timon Gehr, this gives no compilation errors, and prints
nothing:
import std.stdio;
enum Mode { nothing, read, write }
void main() {
final switch (Mode.read | Mode.write) {
case Mode.nothing: writeln(0); break;
case Mode.read:writeln(1); break;
case Mode.write: writeln(2); break;
}
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6548] [e2ir.c] Problem with ^^ vector op
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6548 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-09-07 13:17:21 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/344/files Finalised feature and added test cases. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6335] Issues with d-p-l.org statement.html, std_getopt.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6335 jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.k.muel...@gmx.de --- Comment #2 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de 2011-09-07 13:48:00 PDT --- statement.html looks fine to me and Language Reference expands. There is only the OL on http://www.d-programming-language.org/phobos/std_getopt.html left which I cannot reproduce locally. Here they are numbered. BTW When is www.d-programming-language.org regenerated? I suppose this is done if a new version is released to reflect the changes. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6395] ICE(glue.c) Multiple-at-a-time bug breaking e.g. DustMite
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6395 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Summary|Multiple-at-a-time bug |ICE(glue.c) |breaking e.g. DustMite |Multiple-at-a-time bug ||breaking e.g. DustMite --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-09-07 15:22:07 PDT --- Looks like bug 2962 to me. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5754] ICE(glue.c): using nested delegate literal as template alias parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5754
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE('glue.c'): using nested |ICE(glue.c): using nested
|delegate literal as |delegate literal as
|template alias parameter|template alias parameter
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-09-07 15:24:09 PDT ---
See also bug 2962.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6395] ICE(glue.c) Multiple-at-a-time bug breaking e.g. DustMite
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6395 --- Comment #4 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2011-09-07 15:33:10 PDT --- @Don: I don't have time to dig into the issue right now, feel free to close this bug as a duplicate if you think it is one. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6605] Add switch to enable setting library search paths via command line
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605 --- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-09-07 15:50:32 PDT --- Well crap, this syntax doesn't work if you use the -lib switch with DMD. Is there any workaround for this? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5749] argument evaluation order of chained function from right
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5749 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #5 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2011-09-07 15:53:41 PDT --- The result also changes with respect to enabling -inline or not. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6620] New: argument evaluation order inversed for extern(C)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6620
Summary: argument evaluation order inversed for extern(C)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #0 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2011-09-07 16:05:10 PDT ---
version (none)
{
extern(C) int bar(int a, int b) { return b - a; }
}
else
{
int bar(int a, int b) { return b - a; }
}
void main()
{
int i;
assert(bar(++i, ++i) == 1);
}
---
I know argument evaluation order isn't really guaranteed to be left to right.
But having a reverse order for extern(C) calls is simply surprising.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6620] argument evaluation order inversed for extern(C)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6620 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-08 14:30:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #0) I know argument evaluation order isn't really guaranteed to be left to right. It isn't guaranteed _at all_, it's undefined. I think there's already an enhancement open about defining the order of evaluation, but until that's accepted this is perfectly valid behavior by the compiler. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4500] scoped moves class after calling the constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4500 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6040] std.cpuid and core.cpuid return different values for some methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6040 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-09-07 22:30:08 PDT --- Fixed 2.055 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5825] write is calling a deprecated function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5825 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|Other |All Resolution||FIXED OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-08 15:42:54 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/225 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/711f7e2e84d7cbb7a643db70f041868f555d5300 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
