[Issue 7176] Lambda = syntax for function and methods too
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7176 Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment #7 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2012-01-03 23:30:48 PST --- I could really have a use for this. I have a lot of methods that just returns a single expression. Another idea would be to allow optional braces for methods and functions, just as for if-statements. This could be extended to all language features where braces are used to make it more consistent. In addition to the above we could make implicit returns possible to all functions and methods. I don't know which of these two ideas are farthest away from the normal C-based syntax. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7216] New: [CTFE] Can't call struct member function using pointer field
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7216
Summary: [CTFE] Can't call struct member function using pointer
field
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-01-04 10:51:19 MSK
---
---
struct S {
S* ptr;
int t; // no errors if `t` is commented
void f() { }
}
int f() {
S s0, s1;
s0.ptr = s1;
s0.ptr.f(); // Error: couldn't find field ptr of type S in S(s1,0)
return 0;
}
void main() {
enum e = f();
}
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7217] New: Regression(head 7c839960): [CTFE] ICE on accesing struct array field
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7217
Summary: Regression(head 7c839960): [CTFE] ICE on accesing
struct array field
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-01-04 11:22:00 MSK
---
It compiles with dmd 2.057. But with head commit (7c839960):
Assertion failure: '((StructLiteralExp *)newval)-ownedByCtfe' on line 6281 in
file 'interpret.c'
---
struct S { int[] arr; }
int f() {
auto s = S();
auto t = s.arr;
return 0;
}
enum e = f();
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7223] New: Access violation when using rmdirRecurse on folder without modify permissions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7223 Summary: Access violation when using rmdirRecurse on folder without modify permissions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 13:54:27 PST --- On Windows if you do not have permissions to modify a folder (i.e. delete it) then the program will crash with an Access Violation instead of throwing a FileException. I tried adding writeln statements to try and narrow down the code and instead I end up with an infinite loop. Interesting bits below. === Bypassed === std.file.FileException@std\file.d(551): C:\New folder\New Text Document.txt: Acc ess is denied. 436098 435F0F 403296 402125 402042 4027C8 40280C 402403 4BF2E5 object.Error: Access Violation 436098 435F0F 402042 4027C8 40280C 402403 4BF2E5 Bypasses std.file.FileException@std\file.d(551) object.Error: Access Violation -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7117] Regression(2.057, 1.072): out contract for class member functions are broken
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7117 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 14:03:39 PST --- From git bisect's man page: The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code cannot be tested. If the script exits with this code, the current revision will be skipped (see git bisect skip above). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7224] New: Throwing precondition of nothrow function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7224
Summary: Throwing precondition of nothrow function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-04 14:14:10 PST ---
This function compiles with no errors with DMD 2.058head:
bool foo() {
throw new Exception();
}
void main() nothrow
in {
assert(foo());
} body {}
but main() raises an exception (main() doesn't raise an exception in release
mode).
I think this is a problem.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7225] New: immutable argument by const ref
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7225
Summary: immutable argument by const ref
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-04 14:15:07 PST ---
In this program:
- a1 gives no errors and this is correct;
- a2 gives an error, and I think this is correct;
- a3 too gives an error, and I think this is not correct, because it not a
manifest constant:
void foo(const ref int[2] M) {}
void main() {
const int[2] a1 = [1, 2];
foo(a1);
enum int[2] a2 = [1, 2]; // line 5
foo(a2);
immutable int[2] a3 = [1, 2];
foo(a3);
}
DMD 2.058head gives:
test.d(6): Error: function test.foo (ref const(int[2u]) M) is not callable
using argument types (int[2u])
test.d(5): Error: [1,2] is not an lvalue
test.d(8): Error: cast(const(int[2u]))a3 is not an lvalue
The first two error messages are not good, I think they should be merged in a
single more clear error message relative to just line 6.
A similar program that uses just ints:
void foo(const ref int M) {}
void main() {
const int a1 = 1;
foo(a1);
enum int a2 = 1;
foo(a2);
immutable int a3 = 1;
foo(a3);
}
DMD 2.058head gives:
test.d(6): Error: function test3.foo (ref const(int) M) is not callable using
argument types (int)
test.d(5): Error: constant 1 is not an lvalue
test.d(8): Error: constant 1 is not an lvalue
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7226] New: Refused pure nothrow ctor syntax
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7226
Summary: Refused pure nothrow ctor syntax
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-04 14:16:06 PST ---
I think this is a parser issue:
struct Foo {
static this() pure nothrow {}
}
void main() {}
DMD 2.058head gives:
test.d(2): semicolon expected following function declaration
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A different case:
struct Foo {
static pure this() {}
}
void main() {}
DMD 2.058head gives:
test.d(2): Error: constructor test.Foo.this default constructor for structs
only allowed with @disable and no body
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7219] New: valid overrides with type qualifiers rejected
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7219
Summary: valid overrides with type qualifiers rejected
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #0 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-01-04 09:30:04 PST ---
With DMD 2.057, all three overrides fail:
class A{
void foo(immutable(int)[] x){}
immutable(int)[] bar(immutable(int)[] x){return x;}
immutable(int) qux(immutable(int) y){return y;}
}
class B: A{
override void foo(const(int)[] x){}
override inout(int)[] bar(inout(int)[] x){return x;}
override int qux(int y){return y;}
}
The code should compile.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4549] D2 Language Docs: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/expression.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4549 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 09:33:14 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/52 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4560] D2 Language Docs: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/const3.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4560 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 10:15:32 PST --- Fixed ages ago. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7220] New: Bad initialization when using mixin to generate a static field in a -lib'rary
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7220
Summary: Bad initialization when using mixin to generate a
static field in a -lib'rary
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: xtzgzo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Alex R�nne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com 2012-01-04
10:17:29 PST ---
main.d:
module main;
import std.stdio,
faulty;
static this()
{
writefln(Faulty.instance: %s, Faulty.instance);
}
private int main(string[] args)
{
writeln(Main);
return 0;
}
faulty.d:
module faulty;
import std.stdio;
private mixin template DefineCoreType(string type)
{
mixin(public final class ~ type ~
{ ~
private static ~ type ~ _instance; ~
~
@property public static ~ type ~ instance() ~
{ ~
writeln(\accessing ~ type ~ .instance()\);~
return _instance; ~
} ~
~
static this() ~
{ ~
writeln(\initializing ~ type ~._instance\);~
_instance = new ~ type ~ (); ~
} ~
~
});
}
mixin DefineCoreType!(Faulty);
Compile with:
dmd -lib faulty.d
dmd main.d faulty.lib
Run the resulting main.exe, and you'll see this output:
accessing Faulty.instance()
Faulty.instance: null
initializing Faulty._instance
Main
but the expected output is:
initializing Faulty._instance
accessing Faulty.instance()
Faulty.instance: faulty.DefineCoreType!(Faulty).Faulty
Main
The error does not occur if faulty.d is not compiled as a -lib'rary (i.e.
compiled directly into the executable), or if you unroll the mixin so faulty.d
becomes like so:
module faulty;
import std.stdio;
// this works properly!
public final class Faulty
{
private static Faulty _instance;
@property public static Faulty instance()
{
writeln(accessing Faulty.instance());
return _instance;
}
static this()
{
writeln(initializing Faulty._instance);
_instance = new Faulty();
}
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7227] New: [] syntax for empty associative array too?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7227
Summary: [] syntax for empty associative array too?
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-04 14:37:27 PST ---
void foo(int[int] bb) {}
void main() {
int[int] aa;
aa = null; // OK
foo(null); // OK
aa = []; // Error
foo([]); // Error
}
DMD 2.058head gives:
test.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ([]) of type void[] to
int[int]
test.d(7): Error: function test2.foo (int[int] bb) is not callable using
argument types (void[])
test.d(7): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ([]) of type void[] to
int[int]
I am not sure, but maybe the second syntax too should be accepted.
An alternative syntax for empty associative array literal:
void foo(int[int] bb) {}
void main() {
int[int] aa;
aa = [:];
foo([:]);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7117] Regression(2.057, 1.072): out contract for class member functions are broken
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7117 --- Comment #6 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 14:38:08 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) From git bisect's man page: The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code cannot be tested. If the script exits with this code, the current revision will be skipped (see git bisect skip above). Nice! I didn't know that. Thanks! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6205] Strongly-pure nothrow functions with ignored return value are entirely stripped even if it contains a failing 'assert'.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6205 --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 03:07:56 PST --- I think this is 'too early optimization' bug. Mechanism: 1. The calling of a function that is strong-pure and nothrow is 'no side effect'. Then dmd marks it in IR level. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/blob/master/src/e2ir.c#L286 2. OPucallns and OPcallns are completely removed in backend optimizer level. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/blob/master/src/backend/cgelem.c#L4088 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/blob/master/src/backend/cgelem.c#L4385 The mistaken is in #1. assert() has 'implicit side effect' (throw AssertError, or halt), so all of function call with enabling assertion should disable 'remove no side effect calling' optimization. At least, a compilation without -O switch should not remove such calls. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4563] [module system] Error messages for missing package or missing name
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4563
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-04 03:11:27 PST ---
The situation is not improved.
Wrong D2 code:
import core.stdc.stdlib: puts;
import std.stdio: reverse;
void main() {
puts(hello);
int[] a = [1, 2, 3];
reverse(a);
}
After the recent changes in import semantics DMD 2.058head gives:
test.d(4): Error: undefined identifier puts
test.d(6): Error: undefined identifier reverse
But instead of such errors at the usage point I suggest to give import errors,
something like:
test.d(1): Error: name 'puts' not present in 'core.stdc.stdlib' module.
test.d(2): Error: name 'reverse' not present in 'std.stdio' module.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6205] Strongly-pure nothrow functions with ignored return value are entirely stripped even if it contains a failing 'assert'.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6205 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 04:24:59 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/607 Only `-O -release` specification ignite the optimization. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7117] Regression(2.057, 1.072): out contract for class member functions are broken
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7117 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-01-04 05:54:59 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #0) I tried to do a git bisect to come up with the exact commit that broke this but it was impossible because there are commits that doesn't compile. git bisect skip should help in such situations. Not in this case. Almost every commit was broken. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7035] Please use instead broken documentation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7035 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6996] std.typecons calls writeln without importing std.stdio
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6996 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 06:42:05 PST --- Seems to be fixed in 2.057. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6821] core.exception.OutOfMemoryError on dtor field test of class-embedded struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6821 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 06:44:01 PST --- I think it's ok to close this, this is a GC implementation issue and is not necessarily a bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6605] Add switch to enable setting library search paths via command line
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6768] Problem with init of struct members in presence of templated opAssign
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6768 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 06:49:54 PST --- In 2.057 all calls to the `dg` delegate print garbage values if the templated opAssign was used: Point: Point(4202703, 4931824, void delegate()) Point: Point(1244728, 4202612, void delegate()) Point: Point(4202726, 4931824, void delegate()) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6732] ICE: __traits(compiles) fails on valid expression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6732
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
Summary|__traits(compiles) fails on |ICE: __traits(compiles)
|valid expression|fails on valid expression
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04
06:55:23 PST ---
The following has now turned into an ICE (is a crash equivalent to an ICE?) in
2.057:
template isDouble(T)
{
enum bool isDouble = __traits(hasMember, T, x);
}
void test(T)(T rhs) if (isDouble!T) { }
void main()
{
test(4.5);
}
---
dmd.exe - Application Error
---
The instruction at 0x00489e61 referenced memory at 0x. The memory
could not be read.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6821] core.exception.OutOfMemoryError on dtor field test of class-embedded struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6821 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 06:56:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) Because AssertError is an object, I understand. I think it was Vladimir who changed it to throw an exception, which is a good thing rather than have it corrupt memory. Yup. The newer Druntime versions have a dedicated exception class for this error (InvalidMemoryOperationError), which should be Google-able enough to clear confusion regarding it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6710] Can't use .sizeof in pragma(msg) call
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6710 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 06:56:49 PST --- Workaround: Put the pragma call outside of the structure definition. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6632] toUTFz sometimes does not work with const parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6632 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 06:57:43 PST --- Fixed in 2.057, thanks Jonathan. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7101] Downloads Tools doesn't expand
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7101 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:03:16 PST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6441 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6441] Downloads Tools section is impossible to reach
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6441 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:03:16 PST --- *** Issue 7101 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6456] toString fails with alias this when more than one field present
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6456 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:03:57 PST --- Fixed in 2.057, but I don't know which pull fixed it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6364] Static struct's destructor called on exit of function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6364 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:07:56 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) To clarify: It should print 1 both times. I think the dtor should run on app exit, since it's a static variable. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6175] String corruption when passing static char arrays to std.conv
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6175
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04
07:17:05 PST ---
This has now changed to a template error:
import std.conv;
void main()
{
char[9] statCArr = blablabla;
auto res1 = to!(char[])(statCArr);
}
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\conv.d(237): Error: template
std.conv.toImpl(T,S) if (isImplicitlyConvertible!(S,T)) toImpl(T,S) if
(isImplicitlyConvertible!(S,T)) matches more than one template declaration,
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\conv.d(245):toImpl(T,S) if
(isImplicitlyConvertible!(S,T)) and
D:\DMD\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\conv.d(350):toImpl(T,S) if
(isStaticArray!(S))
A simple workaround is to pass a slice:
auto res1 = to!(char[])(statCArr[]);
But since to() seems to have specializations for static arrays I'll leave this
open.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6021] std.net.isemail missing from dpl.org
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6021 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:23:01 PST --- Fixed in 2.057, and probably an earlier release. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6020] Dead link: http://d-programming-language.org/32-64-portability.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6020 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:23:34 PST --- Fixed in 2.057 and earlier. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5913] std.range.put broken sentence
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5913 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:25:31 PST --- The docs for this function have changed, this is fixed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5460] enum of struct not calling constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5460
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04
07:33:27 PST ---
The following has now changed into a CT error:
enum Sizes : Size {
Minimum = Size(10)
}
struct Size {
int store;
}
void main()
{
}
test.d(4): Error: Integer constant expression expected instead of Size(10)
test.d(4): Error: Integer constant expression expected instead of Size(10)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5358] std.functional: binaryReverseArgs toDelegate missing from documentation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5358 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:36:03 PST --- toDelegate is now documented, but not binaryReverseArgs. I think it's just missing an extra asterisk in its comment to make it ddoc'ed /* = /** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4736] http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/hash-map.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4736 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:41:52 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/51 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4556] Wrong docs for nested functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4556 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Misbehaving nested function |Wrong docs for nested ||functions --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:47:14 PST --- It's the docs that are outdated, changing title and will make a pull shortly. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4562] D2 Language Docs: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dbc.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4562 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 07:45:24 PST --- This has turned into a CT error in 2.057 and probably earlier: test.d(11): Error: function test.B.test cannot have an in contract when overriden function test.A.test does not have an in contract I think it's ok to close it then. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7218] New: Nested function with contract is rejected
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7218
Summary: Nested function with contract is rejected
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 08:26:00 PST ---
This code can't compile.
void main()
{
size_t foo() in{} out{} body{ return 0; } // OK
size_t bar() in{} /*out{}*/ body{ return 0; } // OK
size_t hoo() /*in{}*/ out{} body{ return 0; } // NG1
size_t baz() /*in{} out{}*/ body{ return 0; } // NG2
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7218] Nested function with contract is rejected
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7218 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 08:31:25 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/608 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4547] D2 Language Docs: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/property.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4547 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 08:47:28 PST --- Fixed ages ago, forgot to close. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5849] std.random.dice is better as a range
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5849 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1060|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-04 14:58:04 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1066) Version 0.5 of the fast dice You may want to package contributions as pull requests. Thanks! Thank you. I think the current code is not yet fit for a pull request, there are some things to be done/solved first: - Create statistical unittests. - Is popLast() overkill/not useful enough? - Is the Range correct now? - Is uint[] enough for mAlias? - ddoc comments are missing still. - Currently the Dice constructor lacks a pre-condition: I think the input probabilities must sum to 1.0. But is this necessary? An alternative design is to accept any array of numbers (integers too), and normalize their sum to 1.0 inside the Dice constructor itself. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6157] to!string should work for various pointer types
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6157 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 16:59:06 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1067) utf Added implementation to be added to std.conv. These have to be further verified. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6157] to!string should work for various pointer types
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6157 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-04 17:00:31 PST --- Btw, several people have asked for to!(char*)/to!(wchar*)/to!(dchar*) to work, so I've added a simple template overload that forwards to toUTFz. Personally I think this is a good convenience. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7187] Regression(head 12d62ca5): [CTFE] ICE on slicing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7187 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-04 18:24:34 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/51bc588d2e834650e5278247cd06b5da36569feb https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/602 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6933] Segfault(declaration.c) using struct with destructor in CTFE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6933 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-04 18:24:54 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/51bc588d2e834650e5278247cd06b5da36569feb https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/602 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7185] [CTFE] ICE on changing char array length
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7185 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-04 18:25:11 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/51bc588d2e834650e5278247cd06b5da36569feb https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/602 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7194] [CTFE] Incorrect behaviour with pointers as local struct variable fields
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7194 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-04 18:25:27 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/51bc588d2e834650e5278247cd06b5da36569feb https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/602 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7228] New: MOVDQ2Q instruction is emitted with swapped register indices
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7228 Summary: MOVDQ2Q instruction is emitted with swapped register indices Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: psztur...@tlen.pl --- Comment #0 from Piotr Szturmaj psztur...@tlen.pl 2012-01-04 21:03:48 PST --- With D's inline assembler, this instruction: movdq2q MM2, XMM7; is emitted as: movdq2q MM7, XMM2; I encountered this behaviour only with this instruction. Its reverse instruction movq2dq is emitted correctly. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6632] toUTFz sometimes does not work with const parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6632 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-01-04 21:56:09 PST --- LOL. My fix actually hasn't been checked in yet. The changes to IFTI made it completely unnecessary (and is why it works in 2.057). In fact, I just removed my fix from the pull request for adding toUTF, since there's no reason to have it anymore. The change to how IFTI deals with const and immutable arrays is moste definitely a welcome one. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
