[Issue 5584] bad string representation of function types with C/Windows linkage
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5584 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze 2012-04-25 23:15:19 PDT --- Looks good. Fix was in dmd 2.056 with commit https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/6c1a3e105529a7577d119a46c1427572be2eabbb -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7986] New: segfault in rt.lifetime.__doPostblit on array of struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7986
Summary: segfault in rt.lifetime.__doPostblit on array of
struct
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: druntime
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: ricoche...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Matt Peterson 2012-04-25 21:58:56
PDT ---
Using DMD v2.060 git 900c537038932435eaebdf7c0f80926e0bd8f2f5
postblitbug.d
struct X {}
void main() {
X[] xs;
xs ~= [X()];
}
gdb backtrace:
#0 0x0001 in ?? ()
#1 0x0041ef10 in rt.lifetime.__doPostblit() (ti=0x630550, len=1,
ptr=0x77ec5fe0) at src/rt/lifetime.d:589
#2 0x004162dc in _d_arrayappendT (ti=0x77ec5fe0, x=0x429620,
y=...)
at src/rt/lifetime.d:1611
#3 0x004149fa in D main ()
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3866] anonymous delegate with default parameters cross-talks to another anonymous delegate
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3866 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2012-04-25 20:35:30 PDT --- Moving the default arguments out of the type and into the function declaration will resolve the problem, at the cost of you would no longer be able to have default arguments for function literals or any pointers to functions. Perhaps that's a good thing. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 --- Comment #39 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-25 16:27:25 PDT --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/d5a33a1cbeedec2ea65ba480636caaf78ca05117 fix Issue 2962 - ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2962 --- Comment #40 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-25 16:27:51 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/900c537038932435eaebdf7c0f80926e0bd8f2f5 fix Issue 2962 - ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570 Johan Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thepumpkin1...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Johan Hernandez 2012-04-25 11:19:32 PDT --- This is definitely a blocker, please fix this, this is a huge issue on OSX too. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7041] [PATCH] Add -di option to show deprecated errors as warnings
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041 --- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella 2012-04-25 04:58:58 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Please see this pull request: > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/908 > > It only includes the patch adding the deprecation() function. I think is good > independently of the discussion about adding deprecations as warnings. Pull request for dmd-1.x branch: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/909 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7041] [PATCH] Add -di option to show deprecated errors as warnings
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7041 --- Comment #4 from Leandro Lucarella 2012-04-25 04:43:27 PDT --- Please see this pull request: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/908 It only includes the patch adding the deprecation() function. I think is good independently of the discussion about adding deprecations as warnings. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7984] why is there a hidden field this in nested struct with non-static methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7984 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #2 from Don 2012-04-25 03:01:02 PDT --- There may be a valid spec bug here: the 'structs and unions' page says that a struct is a POD, but it's not true in the case of nested structs. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7984] why is there a hidden field this in nested struct with non-static methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7984 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-04-25 02:40:00 PDT --- Why are you asking a question in a bug report? Bugzilla is for bug reports and enhancement requests, not questions. Please ask questions in the newsgroup: http://forum.dlang.org/ -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2328] setTypeInfo in gc.d backwards.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2328 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-25 01:43:15 PDT --- Commit pushed to phobos-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/e13d211422f71a681f08bf28df2c54bd7bf9dc88 fix Issue 2328 - setTypeInfo in gc.d backwards. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650
--- Comment #11 from SomeDude 2012-04-25 01:24:40
PDT ---
I noticed that just after compilation, the first run is always slightly longer
than the following ones by about 50 to 80 ms.
The other observation, - and that's crazy -, is if I uncomment the line
writeln(walkLength(t[]));
I am consistently *faster* by 10 to 25 ms than when it's commented !!
My dmd measurements are done via Powershell command:
Measure-Command{./bug.exe}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #10 from SomeDude 2012-04-25 01:12:19 PDT --- For range = 100, n = 10_000_000 Eclipse, JVM1.6 with option -Xmx512M : 381 ms dmd -O -release -inline (2.059): around 1800 ms -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1838] Missing redundant symbols make compile time monsters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1838 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2012-04-25 01:13:49 PDT --- I don't believe this is an issue any more. To create libraries from multiple files, just list all the files on one command line, and specify -lib. dmd will produce fine grained object files, sometimes many per source file. This is the way Phobos is currently built, for example. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #9 from SomeDude 2012-04-25 00:56:28 PDT --- Ah ok, my measurements (Core2Duo 2,14GHz, 2Gb RAM WinXP SP3): range = 100_000_000 n = 10_000_000 Eclipse, JVM1.6 with option -Xmx512M : 9781 ms 537Mb RAM (note that I don't have a server JVM) dmd -O -release -inline (2.059): 25367 ms , 321 Mb RAM -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7985] New: Impossible to cast interface/object reference to void* in presence of 'alias this'
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7985
Summary: Impossible to cast interface/object reference to void*
in presence of 'alias this'
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment #0 from Max Samukha 2012-04-25 00:48:26
PDT ---
struct S
{
}
interface I
{
@property S foo();
alias foo this;
}
class A
{
@property S foo() { return S(); }
alias foo this;
}
void main()
{
A a;
I i;
auto ap = cast(void*)a;
auto ip = cast(void*)i;
}
Error: cannot cast from S to void*
It is easy to workaround for class objects by casting the reference to Object
first. Interfaces require more voodoo.
Can we just have a .ptr property on class/interface references?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7958] Uniform Function Call fails if class defined inside a function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7958
--- Comment #1 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-04-25 00:34:07 PDT ---
EDIT:
more importantly, it also fails if fun() is defined inside a function:
//this doesn't work:
class A{ int x; }
void myfunction(){
int fun(A a){return a.x;}
A a=new A;
auto x=a.fun; //fails
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7984] New: why is there a hidden field this in nested struct with non-static methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7984
Summary: why is there a hidden field this in nested struct with
non-static methods
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: thelastmamm...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from thelastmamm...@gmail.com 2012-04-25 00:27:20 PDT ---
Why is there a hidden field "this" in a struct with non-static methods that is
defined in a function?
given:
void myfunction(){
struct C1{int n; }
struct C2{int n; void fun(){}}
writeln(C1.init); //prints C(0)
writeln(C1.init.sizeof); //prints 4
writeln(C2.init); //prints C(0,null)
writeln(C2.init.sizeof); //prints 8 (on 32bit)
}
In visualD, C2 appears as {n=0 this=0x }. this only occurs when C2 has
at least 1 non-static method.
* Why is this, since C2 seems to be a POD ?
* the "this" field seems to be always 0x (from inspection in visualD)
* the hidden extra field (and extra size) disappears when C2 is not defined
inside a function, or is defined in a class.
I couldn't find any related info in the book nor the docs.
Thanks!
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
