[Issue 9277] New: [diagnostic] bad error message on illegal cast inside foreach
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9277
Summary: [diagnostic] bad error message on illegal cast inside
foreach
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: druntime
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: dmitry.o...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2013-01-07
01:26:56 PST ---
On dmd 2.061 the following (illegal) program:
void main()
{
class Int
{
int _val;
this(int val){ _val = val; }
}
Int[] sink;
foreach(v; 0..5_000)
sink ~= [cast(Int)v]; //12
foreach(v; 0..5_000)
sink ~= cast(Int)v; //14
}
Produces:
bug.d(12): Error: e2ir: cannot cast v of type int to type bug.main.Int
bug.d(14): Error: e2ir: cannot cast v of type int to type bug.main.Int
The awful 'e2ir:' part of message seems to only trigger if v is coming from
foreach variable.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8754] Function commonPrefix returns invalid string when passing two cyrillic utf-8 strings
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8754 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2013-01-07 02:14:00 PST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8890 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8890] std.algorithm.commonPrefix does not handle unicode correctly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8890 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8890] std.algorithm.commonPrefix does not handle unicode correctly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8890 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lxyd.dl...@lxyd.net --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2013-01-07 02:14:01 PST --- *** Issue 8754 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9268] [ice-on-invalid] void assignment in fail44.d no longer caught in frontend
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9268 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 05:44:16 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1434 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9268] [ice-on-invalid] void assignment in fail44.d no longer caught in frontend
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9268 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 06:30:43 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) Maybe d_do_test should generally check the error messages for Internal error instead of just testing the exit value? I added the code to check Internal error: message in the pull request. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6707] Error message for mismatch of const/non-const property functions needs to improve
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6707 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 07:10:36 PST --- *** Issue 8552 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8552] Bogus diagnostic when member function call doesn't match constancy
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8552 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 07:10:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Seems fixed in latest git head: $ dmd test.d test.d(30): Error: mutable method test.SimpleCaseEntry.isUpper is not callable using a const object test.d(31): Error: mutable method test.SimpleCaseEntry.isLower is not callable using a const object The lack of information about qualifier mismatching is fixed by bug 6707. After that, the error message is improved by fixing bug 1730. Both are fixed in 2.061. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6707 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9277] [diagnostic] bad error message on illegal cast inside foreach
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9277 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, pull CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Component|druntime|DMD AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 09:08:40 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1435 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3970] Problem with cast -1.0L == uint/ulong
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3970
--- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2013-01-07 09:07:42 PST ---
This passes on Linux32 and 64, on 1.076 and 2.061. Also tested on D1.073 so it
has been working for quite some time on Linux. Need to check if it is
Windows-specific.
void main() {
static assert((cast(ushort)(-1.0)) == 0x);
static assert((cast(ushort)(-1.0L)) == 0x);
static assert((cast(uint)(-1.0)) == 0x_);
static assert((cast(uint)(-1.0L)) == 0x_);
static assert((cast(ulong)(-1.0L)) == 0x___UL);
assert((cast(ushort)(-1.0)) == 0x);
assert((cast(ushort)(-1.0L)) == 0x);
assert((cast(uint)(-1.0)) == 0x_);
assert((cast(uint)(-1.0L)) == 0x_);
assert((cast(ulong)(-1.0L)) == 0x___UL);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9191] Unhelpful error message on failing override
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9191 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, pull CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 09:25:22 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1436 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9277] [diagnostic] bad error message on illegal cast inside foreach
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9277 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic, pull| AssignedTo|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com |nob...@puremagic.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 09:40:45 PST --- Pull was wrong, this was not a diagnostic problem. The 'e2ir' is a minor ICE, the error check should happen in the front-end. Once that is fixed this error message will improve. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9191] Unhelpful error message on failing override
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9191 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-07 09:51:28 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/5bcba1f0ff22786d47dacf7f24d9d9231291ef7c Fixes Issue 9191 - Wrong diagnostic on failing override. For failing overrides the compiler should look for similar symbols in the base classes and interfaces, and not the current class. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/870bc8690ae4d4898667fbcc572589e842869a32 Merge pull request #1436 from AndrejMitrovic/Fix9191 Issue 9191 - Wrong diagnostic on failing override -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9268] [ice-on-invalid] void assignment in fail44.d no longer caught in frontend
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9268 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-07 10:05:54 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/97e936844677bedf0ab9a05739f63f843cddd155 fix Issue 9268 - [ice-on-invalid] void assignment in fail44.d no longer caught in frontend https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/18e34e9d11f00d7078d13033d9845803eeb59027 Merge pull request #1434 from 9rnsr/fix9268 Issue 9268 - [ice-on-invalid] void assignment in fail44.d no longer caught in frontend -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5243] dmd -run potentially removes user files
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5243 --- Comment #2 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com 2013-01-07 10:46:33 PST --- Can you(In reply to comment #1) Created an attachment (id=1170) [details] patch Possible patch added. I don't have a Posix build system to test it, and there should be a test-script (possibly in shell) to verify it works ok. Can you convert this into a pull request? It will make reviewing more easy. I can write the test case based on the one in the report. All your changes are POSIX only, is the overwriting not happening on Windows? Also, is extremely unlikely, but you can still overwrite unintended files, a check to avoid overwriting anything should be done, but maybe that's much harder to do because you have to change how the file is opened, not just the filename. Finally, any reason for declaring getuid() manually instead of including the appropriate headers? Thanks for addressing this issue! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9047] Expression requiring std.math fails with function-local import
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9047
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |rejects-valid
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
Summary|Bad error message with |Expression requiring
|power ^^ operator |std.math fails with
||function-local import
OS/Version|Windows |All
Severity|minor |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07
10:51:03 PST ---
I don't think this is a diagnostic bug, it's a problem where the compiler
rewrites the call to:
void main() {
import std.math;
auto f = (double a, double b) = .std.math.pow(a, b);
}
This is why you get a undefined identifier std message.
Using the .dot won't work here because the import is function-local.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3970] Problem with cast -1.0L == uint/ulong
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3970 Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 11:02:17 PST --- Just tested on Windows. First two asserts and static asserts pass, the rest fail. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9047] Expression requiring std.math fails with function-local import
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9047
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-07 11:14:42 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't think this is a diagnostic bug, it's a problem where the compiler
rewrites the call to:
void main() {
import std.math;
auto f = (double a, double b) = .std.math.pow(a, b);
}
This is why you get a undefined identifier std message.
Using the .dot won't work here because the import is function-local.
The code the performs that rewriting should verify that the correctness
conditions are satisfied, and otherwise possibly rewrite the ^^ with something
that shows a good error message.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9278] New: ICE todt.c:692 when float containing struct is defined after use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9278 Summary: ICE todt.c:692 when float containing struct is defined after use Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: ice Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: wyatt@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Wyatt wyatt@gmail.com 2013-01-07 12:17:42 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1176) Minimalish test case with comments. Attached code sample builds in 2.060; ICE in 2.061 I didn't try types other than string, int, char, and float; other bugs may exist. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5243] dmd -run potentially removes user files
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5243 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 12:31:42 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Can you convert this into a pull request? It will make reviewing more easy. I'll do it later tonight. All your changes are POSIX only, is the overwriting not happening on Windows? No because executables on win32 always end with .exe. Even if you do dmd -oftest, DMD will still append an .exe . Finally, any reason for declaring getuid() manually instead of including the appropriate headers? The DMC header is unistd.h, but the front-end is also used by GDC and LDC, I don't know which headers they use for this function. It seemed easiest to just declare the function rather than to include an entire header (remember that includes are costly for compile-times in C++). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7659] std.stdio.File.close() erases file.name
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7659 Mike Wey mike-...@planet.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||mike-...@planet.nl Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9047] Expression requiring std.math fails with function-local import
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9047 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 14:59:29 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1438 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9047] Expression requiring std.math fails with function-local import
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9047 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 15:13:35 PST --- *** Issue 4845 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4845] Bad error message with missing math import for ^^
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4845 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 15:13:35 PST --- The pull for 9047 fixes the error message. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 9047 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8635] Allow postfix expressions for new
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aziz.koek...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-08 12:08:11 EST --- *** Issue 8826 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8826] PostExpression cannot follow NewExpression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8826 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2013-01-08 12:08:10 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8635 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5091] main runs after unittests
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5091
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07
17:14:36 PST ---
You can override this behavior by defining your own unittest function:
import core.runtime;
import std.stdio;
import std.string;
import std.path;
bool testRunner()
{
foreach (m; ModuleInfo)
{
if (m is null)
continue;
if (auto fp = m.unitTest)
{
try
{
fp();
}
catch (Throwable e)
{
writeln(e);
}
}
}
// stop execution after tests are done
return false;
}
shared static this()
{
Runtime.moduleUnitTester(testRunner);
}
unittest
{
writeln(in unittest);
assert(1);
}
void main()
{
writeln(not in main);
}
--
I've written a similar test system where I can also set these at runtime via
getopt switches:
- specify which modules to run the tests on (--testMods=foo.bar)
- ditto but set modules which should *not* have their tests ran on
(--ignoreMods=foo.bar.doo)
- specify whether to run the unittests, and whether to run main() if the tests
were successful
I might write a DWiki entry later on how to do this if there's any interest.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4813] trait for getting at access modifiers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4813 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5450] no match for implicit super() call in constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5450 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 18:37:59 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) The only bug here is it could be a better error message. A shame I haven't noticed this report before fixing Issue 8928. The error is now: Error: constructor foo.Bar.this no match for implicit super() call in implicitly generated constructor But I could revert the fix for 8298 and instead avoid generating the ctor at all and printing: Error: class foo.Bar cannot implicitly generate a default ctor when base class foo.Foo is missing a default ctor -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5450] no match for implicit super() call in constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5450 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-07 18:45:54 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1439 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 9280] New: Runtime range violation with named capture groups in regex
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9280 Summary: Runtime range violation with named capture groups in regex Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: nine5...@lantea.net --- Comment #0 from nine5...@lantea.net 2013-01-07 19:05:56 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1177) Source code for test case Given the attached code (also available at https://gist.github.com/5a0b4685c6d316620c86 ) there is a range error when trying to access a named capture group when using a static regex object. When removing static from the declaration of the regex object there is no range error on runtime. The attached test case is run as follows. $ dmd -run regex.d c[1] = a c[nick] = a $ dmd -version=Static -run regex.d c[1] = a core.exception.RangeError@std.regex(2145): Range violation regex(_d_array_bounds+0x16) [0x80c9746] regex() [0x80ce916] regex(@trusted uint std.regex.lookupNamedGroup!(immutable(char)[]).lookupNamedGroup(std.regex.NamedGroup[], immutable(char)[])+0x5a) [0x80c5002] regex(@trusted immutable(char)[] std.regex.Captures!(immutable(char)[], uint).Captures.opIndex!(immutable(char)[]).opIndex(immutable(char)[])+0x48) [0x80c4f20] regex(_Dmain+0xa5) [0x809ef79] regex(extern (C) int rt.dmain2.main(int, char**).void runMain()+0x14) [0x80c9d20] regex(extern (C) int rt.dmain2.main(int, char**).void tryExec(scope void delegate())+0x18) [0x80c9830] regex(extern (C) int rt.dmain2.main(int, char**).void runAll()+0x32) [0x80c9d62] regex(extern (C) int rt.dmain2.main(int, char**).void tryExec(scope void delegate())+0x18) [0x80c9830] regex(main+0x94) [0x80c97e4] /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3) [0xb75c94d3] The bug appears on both dmd 2.059 (on ubuntu) and dmd 2.061 (on archlinux). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5003] regex(replace with delegate) sample doesn't work
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5003 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|and...@erdani.com |dmitry.o...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com 2013-01-07 23:01:30 PST --- Assigning to Dmitry. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6066] std.container: BinaryHeap interface is broken.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6066 --- Comment #1 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com 2013-01-07 23:31:58 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1057 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5773] sort() and topN() fail on sliced/resized array of tuples
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5773 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com 2013-01-07 23:38:59 PST --- Fixed as far back as 2.059. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
