[Issue 16060] extern(C++) abstract base class and interface
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16060 Nicholas Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iamthewilsona...@hotmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Nicholas Wilson --- This is probably the same issue as https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19192 --
[Issue 20123] Impossible to disable post-increment/decrement semantics
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20123 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- @thewilsonator updated dlang/dmd pull request #12301 "Fix issue20123 by allowing opUnaryRight to disable post-[inc|dec]rement" fixing this issue: - Fix issue 20123 by allowing opUnaryRight to disable post-[inc|dec]rement https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/12301 --
[Issue 21753] Struct literal with function literal member not allowed as template value argument
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21753 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dmd pull request #12300 "Fix Issue 21753 - Struct literal with function literal member not allowed" was merged into master: - abe4ac1b6a3b89865076cc6f33ff18f29d24bd58 by Boris Carvajal: Fix Issue 21753 - Struct literal with function literal member not allowed as template value argument https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/12300 --
[Issue 21753] Struct literal with function literal member not allowed as template value argument
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21753 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Dlang Bot --- @BorisCarvajal created dlang/dmd pull request #12300 "Fix Issue 21753 - Struct literal with function literal member not allowed" fixing this issue: - Fix Issue 21753 - Struct literal with function literal member not allowed as template value argument https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/12300 --
[Issue 21753] New: Struct literal with function literal member not allowed as template value argument
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21753
Issue ID: 21753
Summary: Struct literal with function literal member not
allowed as template value argument
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: boris...@gmail.com
From: https://forum.dlang.org/post/syxnzddlnkfwtbvrd...@forum.dlang.org
```d
import std.stdio;
struct Sample{
void function() func1;
void function() func2;
}
void noth(Sample smpl)() {
smpl.func1(); // Error: expression __lambda1 is not a valid template value
argument
smpl.func2(); // Error: expression __lambda2 is not a valid template value
argument
}
void main(){
enum s = Sample(
{writeln("Hello world1");},
{writeln("Hello world2");}
);
s.func1();
s.func2();
noth!(s)();
}
```
A function literal can be a template value argument and the spec says that
"struct literals of template value arguments" are too, so this should be
allowed.
--
[Issue 21752] Template constraint breaks overload resolution
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21752 moonlightsenti...@disroot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |regression --- Comment #1 from moonlightsenti...@disroot.org --- Regression introduced by https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/2826 --
[Issue 21752] New: Template constraint breaks overload resolution
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21752
Issue ID: 21752
Summary: Template constraint breaks overload resolution
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: moonlightsenti...@disroot.org
A template constraint for a nested template breaks overload resolution in the
following example (even though the constraint is satisfied). Commenting the
constraint or moving it into a `static assert` fixes the problem.
void foo(A)(A a)
{}
template foo()
{
void foo()()
if (true) // Comment this constraint to make it pass
{}
}
void main()
{
foo!()();
}
The original code used nested templates to create two variadic parameters but
those are not required to trigger this bug.
--
[Issue 21751] New: std.experimental.logger add possibility to pass a throwable to a log
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21751 Issue ID: 21751 Summary: std.experimental.logger add possibility to pass a throwable to a log Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: phobos Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com Reporter: etie...@gitrekt.fr It would be a nice feature to add the possibility to add a Throwable to logs functions and LogEntry. This would add the possibility to enrich the log with Exception information (like the stack trace), as it’s possible to do in languages like Python or java. --
[Issue 21750] -betterC undefined reference to _memsetn
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21750 Nathan S. changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||betterC CC||n8sh.second...@hotmail.com Hardware|x86_64 |All OS|Windows |All --- Comment #1 from Nathan S. --- This is a proper subset of issue 19946. --
[Issue 19946] In betterC filling an array with a non-zero value fails for types of size > 1 due to missing _memset16/_memset32/etc.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19946 Nathan S. changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||21750 Referenced Issues: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21750 [Issue 21750] -betterC undefined reference to _memsetn --
[Issue 21750] -betterC undefined reference to _memsetn
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21750 Nathan S. changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||19946 Referenced Issues: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19946 [Issue 19946] In betterC filling an array with a non-zero value fails for types of size > 1 due to missing _memset16/_memset32/etc. --
[Issue 21750] New: -betterC undefined reference to _memsetn
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21750
Issue ID: 21750
Summary: -betterC undefined reference to _memsetn
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: ryuukk@gmail.com
The following code produces:
onlineapp.d:15: error: undefined reference to '_memsetn'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Error: linker exited with status 1
Only happen in with DMD -betterC, with LDC it compiles fine
Also on a more complex code base i get the following:
Error: `TypeInfo` cannot be used with -betterC
When creating a static array as local variable
```
struct Mat4
{
float a;
}
struct Test
{
char[64] a = 0;
Mat4 b;
}
extern (C) int main()
{
Test[1] test;
return 0;
}
```
--
[Issue 21738] std.format.spec: singleSpec should throw on "%%"
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21738 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/phobos pull request #7894 "Fix Issue 21738 - std.format.spec: singleSpec should throw on "%%"" was merged into master: - 68c7e183d41413c95b37f2e9cf03efa6791bab4c by wolframw: Fix Issue 21738 - std.format.spec: singleSpec should throw on "%%" https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7894 --
[Issue 21672] [REG][ICE][SIMD] accessing SIMD type as a short causes compiler ice
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21672 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dmd pull request #12297 "fix Issue 21672 - [REG][ICE][SIMD] accessing SIMD type as a short cau…" was merged into master: - 1ab1d61186f2a17d2854b3b9e9fef28b0e4ae2eb by Walter Bright: fix Issue 21672 - [REG][ICE][SIMD] accessing SIMD type as a short causes compiler ice https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/12297 --
[Issue 21749] New: Misleading error message for an operator in an 'alias this'ed type
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21749
Issue ID: 21749
Summary: Misleading error message for an operator in an 'alias
this'ed type
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: maxsamu...@gmail.com
struct S {
void opUnary(string op: "++")() {
bad;
}
}
struct S2 {
S s;
alias s this;
}
void main() {
S2 s;
++s;
}
Error: s is not a scalar, it is a S2
The error should be similar to that when the operator is called explicitly:
void main() {
S2 s;
s.opUnary!"++"();
}
onlineapp.d(4): Error: undefined identifier bad
onlineapp.d(15): Error: template instance onlineapp.S.opUnary!"++" error
instantiating
--
[Issue 21403] [ICE] dmd/backend/cgcs.d:375: Assertion `0' failed.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21403
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright ---
And a minimal test case:
int[] mul11ret3(ref int[] s);
void test(int[] val) {
(val ~= mul11ret3(val)) ~= 7;
}
--
[Issue 21403] [ICE] dmd/backend/cgcs.d:375: Assertion `0' failed.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21403
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #2 from Walter Bright ---
A no-template version:
int[] mul11ret3(ref int[] s) {
s ~= 11;
return [3];
}
int[] test(int[] val) {
(val ~= mul11ret3(val)) ~= 7;
return val;
}
void main() {
static assert(test([2]) == [2, 11, 3, 7]);
assert(test([2]) == [2, 11, 3, 7]);
}
--
