[Issue 22367] The __ModuleInfo member spuriously linked for modules compiler with -betterC
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22367 --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright --- > $ dmd -betterC -lib mylib1.d mylib2.d This compiles mylib1.d and mylib2.d, and creates a library file mylib.lib containing the object code from both. > $ dmd -I. mylib1 myexe.d -main This compiles mylib1.d and myexe.d together to form an executable named mylib1.exe. It fails to find anything from mylib2.d, because that wasn't given on the command line. This is not a compiler bug. I think what you really meant was: dmd -betterC mylib1.d mylib2.d which creates mylib1.obj into which is placed the compiled versions of mylib1.d and mylib2.d dmd -I. myexe.d mylib1.obj -main which compiles myexe.d and links it to mylib1.obj, creating an executable named myexe.exe. Or at least it tries to, as it gives: myexe.obj(myexe) Error 42: Symbol Undefined __D6mylib212__ModuleInfoZ because -betterC suppresses generating a ModuleInfo, while myexe.d expects it to be there. This is a compiler bug, or at least a compiler problem. --
[Issue 6019] Phobos imports in autogenerated .di header files break implicit linking with DLLs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6019 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=22367 --
[Issue 9816] Export is mostly broken
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9816 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=22367 --
[Issue 22367] The __ModuleInfo member spuriously linked for modules compiler with -betterC
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22367 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=6019, ||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=9816, ||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=4071 --
[Issue 4071] Missing support to share memory and objects between DLLs and executable
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4071 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=22367 --
[Issue 22367] The __ModuleInfo member spuriously linked for modules compiler with -betterC
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22367 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||dll --
[Issue 23520] pragma(inline, false) not applied to nested function declaration
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org --
[Issue 23520] New: pragma(inline, false) not applied to nested function declaration
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
Issue ID: 23520
Summary: pragma(inline, false) not applied to nested function
declaration
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: ibuc...@gdcproject.org
pragma(inline, false) inside a function applies to the outer function, not the
nested declaration it is apparently part of.
---
void inline(ref int x)
{
pragma(inline, false) static void noinline(ref int x) { }
return noinline(x);
}
---
Not a single call to the nested static function when compiled with inline.
--
[Issue 23519] New: Unnecessary and inconsistent restrictions on delegate subtyping
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23519
Issue ID: 23519
Summary: Unnecessary and inconsistent restrictions on delegate
subtyping
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: timon.g...@gmx.ch
DMD v2.101.0:
class Super{}
class Sub: Super{}
void main(){
void delegate(Super) a0;
void delegate(Sub) b0=a0; // error
const(void delegate(Super))[] a1;
const(void delegate(Sub))[] b1=a1; // ok
Sub delegate() a2;
Super delegate() b2=a2; // ok
const(Sub delegate())[] a3;
const(Super delegate())[] b3=a3; // error
}
All of those should work.
--
[Issue 23518] buildkite ae Socket.bind error
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23518 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||TestSuite --
[Issue 23518] New: buildkite ae Socket.bind error
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23518 Issue ID: 23518 Summary: buildkite ae Socket.bind error Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P1 Component: dmd Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com Reporter: n...@geany.org buildkite often errors for me due to `ae` failing: ``` Running ae-test-library std.socket.SocketOSException@std/socket.d(2841): Unable to bind socket: Cannot assign requested address ??:? @trusted void std.socket.Socket.bind(std.socket.Address) [0x55ba8484d144] ``` https://buildkite.com/dlang/dmd/builds/29012#0184c473-9a1b-45c8-b62f-310779ccadcf --
[Issue 9352] Memory corruption in delegate called by struct dtor
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9352 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luka8...@owave.net --- Comment #5 from RazvanN --- *** Issue 9911 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --
[Issue 9911] postblit not called when function is returning a initialized struct
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9911 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from RazvanN --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 9352 *** --
[Issue 9848] Better diagnostic when type declaration was not expected
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9848 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bootcamp CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com --
[Issue 10123] Can't subtract positive number from length of array of struct with disabled default construction
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10123 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |INVALID --
[Issue 10177] irrelevant compiler error messages: should stop semantic3 passes after 1st error is encountered
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10177 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #4 from RazvanN --- I cannot reproduce this. Running `rdmd --force -unittest main.d` on the example in comment 1 yields: test.d(3): Error: undefined identifier `b`. --
[Issue 5207] Immutability is broken in constructors
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5207
--- Comment #9 from RazvanN ---
Thinking more about this, isn't the idea of module constructors to not type
check qualifiers because it is considered that they are used to initialize data
before the program is actually run? For example, this works:
immutable int a;
shared static this()
{
a = 2;
a = 3;
}
I guess this should be documented.
--
[Issue 5187] Attribute hiding error or warning
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5187 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from RazvanN --- This is documented behavior [1]. There is no need to issue a warning for this. [1] https://dlang.org/spec/class.html#fields --
[Issue 5040] opOpAssign should be automatically visible for types.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5040 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from RazvanN --- The operators may only be defined for classes and structs. For generic code, the mixin construct may be used as previously stated. In D there is a distinction between basic types and aggregate types and not all aggregate operators make sense in the context of builtin types. Also, adding the extra complexity in the compiler does not worth it, considering that we have a perfectly valid workaround. --
[Issue 23517] New: dmd with -g flag fails to link on macOS 13.0.1 (i368) with unaligned pointer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23517
Issue ID: 23517
Summary: dmd with -g flag fails to link on macOS 13.0.1 (i368)
with unaligned pointer
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: paolo.inverni...@gmail.com
It looks like Apple's linker is getting tighter on what it will allow:
~/dlang/dmd-2.101.0/osx/bin/dmd -g hello.d
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: alignment (1) of atom 'anon' is too small and may result in
unaligned pointers
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x10007023A ('anon' + 570 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x100070257 ('anon' + 599 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x100070347 ('anon' + 839 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x100070382 ('anon' + 898 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x10007039E ('anon' + 926 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x1000703D6 ('anon' + 982 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x100070429 ('anon' + 1065 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x100070459 ('anon' + 1113 from
hello.o)
ld: warning: pointer not aligned at address 0x100070475 ('anon' + 1141 from
hello.o)
ld: unaligned pointer(s) for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
Error: linker exited with status 1
--
