[Issue 23823] New: Deprecated class alias ignored completely
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23823
Issue ID: 23823
Summary: Deprecated class alias ignored completely
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: elpenguin...@gmail.com
No deprecation warnings are printed with this code:
```
alias Alias(alias A) = A;
class S {
deprecated alias value1 = Alias!(5);
}
alias shouldWarn = S.value1;
```
The shouldWarn alias should produce a deprecation warning.
--
[Issue 23822] Deprecated struct alias ignored completely
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23822 FeepingCreature changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --
[Issue 23822] Deprecated struct alias ignored completely
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23822
--- Comment #1 from FeepingCreature ---
```
alias Alias(alias A) = A;
class S { deprecated alias value = Alias!5; }
void main() { auto a = S.value; }
```
This errors correctly.
--
[Issue 23822] Deprecated struct alias ignored completely
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23822 FeepingCreature changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||industry --
[Issue 23822] New: Deprecated struct alias ignored completely
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23822
Issue ID: 23822
Summary: Deprecated struct alias ignored completely
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nob...@puremagic.com
Reporter: default_357-l...@yahoo.de
Consider this code:
```
alias Alias(alias A) = A;
deprecated alias value = Alias!5;
void main() { auto a = value; }
```
This correctly errors with Deprecation: alias `onlineapp.value` is deprecated
However, this code:
```
alias Alias(alias A) = A;
struct S { deprecated alias value = Alias!5; }
void main() { auto a = S.value; }
```
gives no warning at all and compiles with `-de`.
(enum works)
--
[Issue 23819] defining your own interface IUnknown messes up vtable without any warning
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23819
--- Comment #1 from Felix Hufnagel ---
To add to that, my initial problem was, that when using two mixins, somehow the
order i mix them in is important. but shouldn't the vtable automatically be
correct when i inherit an interface?
in my mixin IMPLEMENT_REFCOUNT; and mixin QUERY_INTERFACE!(FUnknown, IMessage);
will generate the wrong vtable, unless swapped.
extern (C++)
class HostMessage : IMessage
{
public:
// somehow the order of the two mixins matters
mixin IMPLEMENT_REFCOUNT;
mixin QUERY_INTERFACE!(FUnknown, IMessage);
}
mixin template IMPLEMENT_REFCOUNT() {
override uint addRef() { return 1; }
override uint release() { return 1; }
}
mixin template QUERY_INTERFACE(Interfaces...) {
override tresult queryInterface (ref const TUID _iid, void** obj) { return 1;
}
}
interface IMessage : FUnknown
{
public:
nothrow:
// @nogc:
/** Returns the message ID (for example "TextMessage"). */
FIDString getMessageID();
/** Sets a message ID (for example "TextMessage"). */
void setMessageID(FIDString id /*in*/);
/** Returns the attribute list associated to the message. */
IAttributeList getAttributes();
__gshared immutable TUID iid = INLINE_UID(0x936F033B, 0xC6C047DB,
0xBB0882F8, 0x13C1E613);
}
interface FUnknown : IUnknown {
__gshared immutable TUID iid = INLINE_UID(0x, 0x,
0xC000, 0x0046);
}
interface IUnknown {
tresult queryInterface(ref const(TUID) _iid, void** obj);
uint addRef();
uint release();
}
--
[Issue 23444] Can't append non-copyable struct value to an array
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23444 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from RazvanN --- This seems to be done on purpose, see this comment: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7579#c5 . In short, if you concatenate a struct instance with a disabled postblit you subject yourself to the possibility of the runtime doing copies behind your back (for example, when reallocations happen). This seems pretty nasty because the alternative would be to accept this code and then either do copies that do not call the postblit behind the scenes or have some druntime internal failures (provided that the hooks are properly templated). --
[Issue 19545] __traits(compiles, X) false positive, further uses of X succeed but don't link
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19545 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from RazvanN --- This is a duplicate of 15459. Known issue: the template instance is cached even though it had errors. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 15459 *** --
[Issue 15459] [REG2.065.0] stdin.byLine.each!(map!somefunc) compiles, fails to link with ld
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15459 --- Comment #16 from RazvanN --- *** Issue 19545 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --
[Issue 18493] [betterC] Can't use aggregated type with postblit
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18493 --- Comment #10 from Dlang Bot --- @RazvanN7 created dlang/dmd pull request #15076 "Fix Issue 18493 - [betterC] Can't use aggregated type with postblit" fixing this issue: - Fix Issue 18493 - [betterC] Can't use aggregated type with postblit https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/15076 --
[Issue 20076] [2.087.0] structs won't copy when using alias this and being assigned a const instance of said struct
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20076 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from RazvanN --- The error message for the reduced test case is now: test.d(13): Error: constructor `test.S.this(int* t1)` is not callable using argument types `(const(int*))` test.d(13):cannot pass argument `t3.ip` of type `const(int)*` to parameter `int* t1` The alias this is not mentioned because once the compiler uses it it just has `t3.ip`, it does not have any information on how the expressions is obtained. I think this is the best we can do with regards to the error message. So this seems to have been improved. Closing as WORKSFORME. --
[Issue 22559] ImportC: support gnu case ranges
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22559 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dmd pull request #15068 "fix Issue 22559 - ImportC: support gnu case ranges" was merged into master: - 098a82f6ce9693cbe4075be8d0fc179095a2eeab by Walter Bright: fix Issue 22559 - ImportC: support gnu case ranges https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/15068 --
[Issue 23014] importC: static thread-locals do not work
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23014 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dmd pull request #15069 "fix Issue 23014 - importC: static thread-locals do not work" was merged into master: - 58baa9ef23e01943e2df1985f2e8dfbc38aa7f0b by Walter Bright: fix Issue 23014 - importC: static thread-locals do not work https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/15069 --
[Issue 23816] Typing invalid mnemonic in asm{} block segfaults
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23816
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Dlang Bot ---
dlang/dmd pull request #15060 "Fix Issue 23816 - Typing invalid mnemonic in
asm{} block segfaults" was merged into stable:
- 1a3eb0ea5761fdc249ec5e765d1a3160ed49581b by RazvanN7:
Fix Issue 23816 - Typing invalid mnemonic in asm{} block segfaults
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/15060
--
[Issue 20737] TLS variables unusable with -betterC for Windows MSVC targets
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20737 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright --- More info here: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/15069 --
[Issue 23014] importC: static thread-locals do not work
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23014 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=20737 --
[Issue 20737] TLS variables unusable with -betterC for Windows MSVC targets
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20737 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=23014 --
