[Issue 1405] Stack overflow when getting type info string of an invariant array
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1405 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.003 |D2 --
[Issue 1405] Stack overflow when getting type info string of an invariant array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405 Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2009-10-21 00:52:16 PDT --- dmd 2.035 outputs immutable(immutable(immutable(char)[])[]) which seems to be correct -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1405] Stack overflow when getting type info string of an invariant array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405 --- Comment #3 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2009-10-21 01:20:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) dmd 2.035 outputs immutable(immutable(immutable(char)[])[]) which seems to be correct Technically yes, though it ought to collapse the redundant immutables. immutable(char[][]) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1405] Stack overflow when getting type info string of an invariant array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1405 --- Comment #4 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2009-10-21 01:43:47 PDT --- Probably, yes. On the other hand, the non-normalized string can be easily parsed as immutable reference to immutable array of immutable strings. Anyway, it is not a bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
