[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #13 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to stable at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/cc8d8123ef0dff1705e729d1faad2b710639771f Merge pull request #925 from s-ludwig/master --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Vladimir Panteleev --- Yes, I confirmed it's fixed in git. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #11 from Walter Bright --- (In reply to github-bugzilla from comment #10) > Commit pushed to master at > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org > > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/ > cc8d8123ef0dff1705e729d1faad2b710639771f > Merge pull request #925 from s-ludwig/master > > Issue 14258 - SIGSEGV in dpldocs Does this mean this can be marked as fixed? --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/cc8d8123ef0dff1705e729d1faad2b710639771f Merge pull request #925 from s-ludwig/master Issue 14258 - SIGSEGV in dpldocs --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #9 from Sönke Ludwig --- Hm, you are right of course, totally forgot about that. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Panteleev --- On Linux, what usually happens upon attempting to commit (write to) a page that has been overcommitted (COW of a zero page), when there are no free pages and no pages to swap or reclaim, the OOM killer is invoked and the most memory-hungry process dies with a SIGSEGV. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #7 from Sönke Ludwig --- My systems all have limited swap space - what would the OS do when all that memory is filled with data (note that the array that is piled up is actually written to)? I've added the termination conditions now and will file a PR as soon as the new DDOX version is up on code.dlang.org. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Panteleev --- Except for address space exhaustion, OutOfMemoryError will never realistically occur in any OS with overcommit. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #5 from Sönke Ludwig --- The crash occurs because the proper termination conditions for recursive macro calls are not implemented. I'll do that. There could be an additional issue in the GC/array implementation, though, as I would have expected an OutOfMemoryError instead of a segmentation fault (except if the segfault is caused by a stack overflow). --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev --- I haven't actually reduced it, just added some debug logging to dpldocs and looked with git blame. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak --- Thanks for reducing this, will try to fix it soon. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright --- (In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #1) > I think it's having trouble with this expansion: > > LIX=$(LI $1)$(LIX $+) That idiom is used regularly. --
[Issue 14258] SIGSEGV in dpldocs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev --- I think it's having trouble with this expansion: LIX=$(LI $1)$(LIX $+) Its usage might have been introduced here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/743303055d74cdd3e482a3af3e99af93755f3af6 --
