[Issue 2351] enum with no members allowed

2012-01-22 Thread d-bugmail 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2351



--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-22 11:50:39 PST ---
Commit pushed to
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/commit/31be563dc0bc4afaaf84c24deb527d60c3ec2e83
fix Issue 2351 - enum with no members allowed

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 2351] enum with no members allowed

2012-01-22 Thread d-bugmail 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2351


Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
 Resolution||FIXED


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 2351] enum with no members allowed

2010-02-26 Thread d-bugmail 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2351



--- Comment #4 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2010-02-26 05:29:58 PST 
---
(In reply to comment #3)
 So the meaning of that code changes from declaring an enum type with no 
 members
 to declaring a manifest constant with value 0.

That seems more reasonable to me.  However, if you specify a type as well, DMD
rejects it:

enum long a;

enum1.d(1): Error: variable enum1.a manifest constants must have initializers

So at the moment it is inconsistent.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 2351] enum with no members allowed

2010-02-22 Thread d-bugmail 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2351


Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||http://digitalmars.com/d/2.
   ||0/enum.html
 CC||jlqu...@optonline.net


--- Comment #2 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2010-02-22 04:58:09 PST 
---
This would be fixed by changing the EnumBody rule to

EnumBody:
  EnumMember ;
  { EnumMembers }

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 2351] enum with no members allowed

2010-02-22 Thread d-bugmail 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2351



--- Comment #3 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2010-02-22 08:07:25 PST ---
So the meaning of that code changes from declaring an enum type with no members
to declaring a manifest constant with value 0.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---