http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
--- Comment #7 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-02-21 10:56 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
One of the solutions is to introduce non-nullable types (both reference and
value-types). In this case T.init would be useless (and thus may be safely
removed from language*), because user will *have to* initialize it:
So, as much as I like nonnull types, and as much as I like your proposal,
there's this .. kind of icky part too.
auto a = new ClassType[10];
How exactly do you allocate an array of nonnull types?
* I don't mind if T.init will be removed from language specs altogether as I
never found it useful. It may still be left for some time in compiler
internals
(to copy T[] prior to calling T.__ctor), just don't expose it to users.
I've found it useful!
--